Sport Today

>>>Why would you look at a newsgroup where the latest football results are
>>>likely to be discussed if you don't want to know the result?

>>Because it's a rule we adhere to out of consideration? Listen, we all
>>have different newsgroups and guidelines. We can only leave it up to
>>each person to help us out.

> Surely that's virtually impossible to enforce in a non-moderated newsgroup?

> >>>Why would you look at a newsgroup where the latest football results are
> >>>likely to be discussed if you don't want to know the result?

> >>Because it's a rule we adhere to out of consideration? Listen, we all
> >>have different newsgroups and guidelines. We can only leave it up to
> >>each person to help us out.

> > Surely that's virtually impossible to enforce in a non-moderated
newsgroup?

> You see, some people do not need every little curtesy forced upon
> themselves, they do them out of their own free will. Take a look at rss,
> we only get spoilers in headers from the Ben Smith cunt, everybody else
> seems to have some consideration for the other readers.

> /jussi

> >>Because it's a rule we adhere to out of consideration? Listen, we all
> >>have different newsgroups and guidelines. We can only leave it up to
> >>each person to help us out.

> > Surely that's virtually impossible to enforce in a non-moderated
newsgroup?

> You see, some people do not need every little curtesy forced upon
> themselves, they do them out of their own free will. Take a look at rss,
> we only get spoilers in headers from the Ben Smith cunt, everybody else
> seems to have some consideration for the other readers.

>>>>Because it's a rule we adhere to out of consideration? Listen, we all
>>>>have different newsgroups and guidelines. We can only leave it up to
>>>>each person to help us out.

>>>Surely that's virtually impossible to enforce in a non-moderated

> newsgroup?

>>You see, some people do not need every little curtesy forced upon
>>themselves, they do them out of their own free will. Take a look at rss,
>>we only get spoilers in headers from the Ben Smith cunt, everybody else
>>seems to have some consideration for the other readers.

> so he systematically posts Newcastle's results to rss even though you ask
> him not to?

>>Amoebi, apart from scoring, he's simply***poor. He looks clumpsy and
>>clueless on all front.

> Don't be absurd.  ameobi has looked a real class act since coming back into
> the team.  his upper body strength is superb and he appears to be finally
> learning from Shearer how to hold off a man.  His goal was a brilliant
> example of this.
> Lets hope Mr Erriksson was taking note and considers these facts when he
> next goes to put Emile Heskey's name on a teamsheet.

>>Amoebi, apart from scoring, he's simply***poor. He looks clumpsy and
>>clueless on all front.

> Don't be absurd.  ameobi has looked a real class act since coming back into
> the team.  his upper body strength is superb and he appears to be finally
> learning from Shearer how to hold off a man.  His goal was a brilliant
> example of this.
> Lets hope Mr Erriksson was taking note and considers these facts when he
> next goes to put Emile Heskey's name on a teamsheet.

> Anyway, I think this deserves a wider audience now. Ben is the one on the
> right!!

> http://www0.bbc.co.uk/fivelive/fungames/mugshot_44.shtml

> Anyway, I think this deserves a wider audience now. Ben is the one on the
> right!!

> http://www0.bbc.co.uk/fivelive/fungames/mugshot_44.shtml

>>>>>>Why would you look at a newsgroup where the latest football results are
>>>>>>likely to be discussed if you don't want to know the result?

>>>>>Because it's a rule we adhere to out of consideration? Listen, we all
>>>>>have different newsgroups and guidelines. We can only leave it up to
>>>>>each person to help us out.

>>>>Surely that's virtually impossible to enforce in a non-moderated

>> newsgroup?

>>>You see, some people do not need every little curtesy forced upon
>>>themselves, they do them out of their own free will. Take a look at rss,
>>>we only get spoilers in headers from the Ben Smith cunt, everybody else
>>>seems to have some consideration for the other readers.

>> so he systematically posts Newcastle's results to rss even though you ask
>> him not to?

>He systematically posted all scores to RSS, even after being told
>numerous times that its not a good idea. Then he promised not to post
>scores in headers, and continued posting them anyway. That was when he
>was known as Ronald MacDonald. Since then he has posted about 10 posts a
>day with a line or two of text. When asked to send it all in a daily
>package, he said he would, then promptly continued posting all these
>small posts. At one point he posted the daily update _and_ numerous
>daily posts. Now he got back to posting scores in headers. He really is
>a little ***er, isnt he.

>/jussi

> >>>>>>Why would you look at a newsgroup where the latest football results
are
> >>>>>>likely to be discussed if you don't want to know the result?

> >>>>>Because it's a rule we adhere to out of consideration? Listen, we all
> >>>>>have different newsgroups and guidelines. We can only leave it up to
> >>>>>each person to help us out.

> >>>>Surely that's virtually impossible to enforce in a non-moderated

> >> newsgroup?

> >>>You see, some people do not need every little curtesy forced upon
> >>>themselves, they do them out of their own free will. Take a look at
rss,
> >>>we only get spoilers in headers from the Ben Smith cunt, everybody else
> >>>seems to have some consideration for the other readers.

> >> so he systematically posts Newcastle's results to rss even though you
ask
> >> him not to?

> >He systematically posted all scores to RSS, even after being told
> >numerous times that its not a good idea. Then he promised not to post
> >scores in headers, and continued posting them anyway. That was when he
> >was known as Ronald MacDonald. Since then he has posted about 10 posts a
> >day with a line or two of text. When asked to send it all in a daily
> >package, he said he would, then promptly continued posting all these
> >small posts. At one point he posted the daily update _and_ numerous
> >daily posts. Now he got back to posting scores in headers. He really is
> >a little ***er, isnt he.

> >/jussi

> thats what kill files are for.

> > >>>>>>Why would you look at a newsgroup where the latest football
results
> are
> > >>>>>>likely to be discussed if you don't want to know the result?

> > >>>>>Because it's a rule we adhere to out of consideration? Listen, we
all
> > >>>>>have different newsgroups and guidelines. We can only leave it up
to
> > >>>>>each person to help us out.

> > >>>>Surely that's virtually impossible to enforce in a non-moderated

> > >> newsgroup?

> > >>>You see, some people do not need every little curtesy forced upon
> > >>>themselves, they do them out of their own free will. Take a look at
> rss,
> > >>>we only get spoilers in headers from the Ben Smith cunt, everybody
else
> > >>>seems to have some consideration for the other readers.

> > >> so he systematically posts Newcastle's results to rss even though you
> ask
> > >> him not to?

> > >He systematically posted all scores to RSS, even after being told
> > >numerous times that its not a good idea. Then he promised not to post
> > >scores in headers, and continued posting them anyway. That was when he
> > >was known as Ronald MacDonald. Since then he has posted about 10 posts
a
> > >day with a line or two of text. When asked to send it all in a daily
> > >package, he said he would, then promptly continued posting all these
> > >small posts. At one point he posted the daily update _and_ numerous
> > >daily posts. Now he got back to posting scores in headers. He really is
> > >a little ***er, isnt he.

> > >/jussi

> > thats what kill files are for.

> I assume she has kill filed him, the problem was that the reply to the
post
> still had the score in it