>>>>>Why would you look at a newsgroup where the latest football results are
>>>>>likely to be discussed if you don't want to know the result?
>>>>Because it's a rule we adhere to out of consideration? Listen, we all
>>>>have different newsgroups and guidelines. We can only leave it up to
>>>>each person to help us out.
>>>Surely that's virtually impossible to enforce in a non-moderated
>>You see, some people do not need every little curtesy forced upon
>>themselves, they do them out of their own free will. Take a look at rss,
>>we only get spoilers in headers from the Ben Smith cunt, everybody else
>>seems to have some consideration for the other readers.
> so he systematically posts Newcastle's results to rss even though you ask
> him not to?
He systematically posted all scores to RSS, even after being told
numerous times that its not a good idea. Then he promised not to post
scores in headers, and continued posting them anyway. That was when he
was known as Ronald MacDonald. Since then he has posted about 10 posts a
day with a line or two of text. When asked to send it all in a daily
package, he said he would, then promptly continued posting all these
small posts. At one point he posted the daily update _and_ numerous
daily posts. Now he got back to posting scores in headers. He really is
a little ***er, isnt he.