spurs off to good start

spurs off to good start

Post by Depeche » Mon, 22 Aug 1994 02:58:03


sheffield wednesday 3 spurs 4

spurs - sherringham,klinsmann,barmby,anderton
wednesday  2 own goals and  hurst

spurs are now minus 3 points

 
 
 

spurs off to good start

Post by PM Wo » Mon, 22 Aug 1994 15:57:52

: sheffield wednesday 3 spurs 4

: spurs - sherringham,klinsmann,barmby,anderton
: wednesday  2 own goals and  hurst
What a great start, with 7 goals in one match (and the goals are so evenly
divided, unlike Liverpool who put 6 past Crystal Palace who can only replied
with 1 goal)
: spurs are now minus 3 points
But is your arithmetic a bit different from the norm ? How come they are
deducted 3 points by winning away from home. Is it a new rule laid down by
FIFA (just as silly as the red card business for a tackle from behind)
--

                    \\\//
                    (o o)
[----------------ooO-(_)-Ooo---------------] PM Wong (Computer Officer)
[User User User User User User User User Us] CTSC Hong Kong Baptist College
[ser User User User User User User User Use] 224 Waterloo Road, Kln. HONGKONG
[er User User User User User User User User] Voice: (852)3397425  Fax: 3397888


 
 
 

spurs off to good start

Post by David Littlewo » Tue, 23 Aug 1994 17:18:44


: : sheffield wednesday 3 spurs 4

: : spurs - sherringham,klinsmann,barmby,anderton
: : wednesday  2 own goals and  hurst
: What a great start, with 7 goals in one match (and the goals are so evenly
: divided, unlike Liverpool who put 6 past Crystal Palace who can only replied
: with 1 goal)
: : spurs are now minus 3 points
: But is your arithmetic a bit different from the norm ? How come they are
: deducted 3 points by winning away from home. Is it a new rule laid down by
: FIFA (just as silly as the red card business for a tackle from behind)
: --

Jesus! Do you people in Hong Kong have a special medical condition wherby you
can only hear news about Man U? Do you not know that Spurs will have 6 points
deducted at the end of the season for financial irregularities?
Thus Spurs are effectively -3 points now.

DaveL

 
 
 

spurs off to good start

Post by Kelvin » Tue, 23 Aug 1994 16:01:25

Spurs has minus six points at the start of the league because of the
'poor management' of last season. It is a punishment of FA.
 
 
 

spurs off to good start

Post by Dave du Vergi » Tue, 23 Aug 1994 23:44:14

|> Spurs has minus six points at the start of the league because of the
|> 'poor management' of last season. It is a punishment of FA.

Wrong. The points punishment was for financial irregularities in seasons
preceding but not including the last. If you don't know the facts, don't
waste bandwidth. The deduction is being deferred to the end of the season,
as if that makes any difference - still, it's the thought that counts.

DdV

 
 
 

spurs off to good start

Post by Bruce Mun » Wed, 24 Aug 1994 00:11:40

Quote:

>Spurs has minus six points at the start of the league because of the
>'poor management' of last season. It is a punishment of FA.

This is a new development! We narrowly avoid relegation due to Ossie's
poor management last season, and then we are deducted six points for the
next season. I must say that this is awfully unfair.

Actually, Kelvin, the financial irregularites took place between 1985 and
1991. Not last season.

--

"The game is about glory. It is about doing things in style, with a
flourish, about going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for
them to die of boredom." - Danny Blanchflower

 
 
 

spurs off to good start

Post by Roger Haworth sr.. » Wed, 24 Aug 1994 01:32:59


Quote:


>>Spurs has minus six points at the start of the league because of the
>>'poor management' of last season. It is a punishment of FA.

>This is a new development! We narrowly avoid relegation due to Ossie's
>poor management last season, and then we are deducted six points for the
>next season. I must say that this is awfully unfair.

>Actually, Kelvin, the financial irregularites took place between 1985 and
>1991. Not last season.

>--


Kinda funny how it is always clubs that Ossie Ardiles is involved with that get
done for 'financial irregularities'...like Swindon and now Spurs. Are there any
more notables? I'm sure the Ardiles connection is just coincidence - was he
even at Spurs when the dodgy deals were going on?

Rodge

 
 
 

spurs off to good start

Post by Bruce Mun » Wed, 24 Aug 1994 02:38:35



Quote:

>Kinda funny how it is always clubs that Ossie Ardiles is involved with that get
>done for 'financial irregularities'...like Swindon and now Spurs. Are there any
>more notables? I'm sure the Ardiles connection is just coincidence - was he
>even at Spurs when the dodgy deals were going on?

Not sure about Swindon, but Ardiles was definitely not at Spurs during the
time the loans were being dished out. Well, in a managerial capacity that
is. I seem to recall that he may have been an early recipient of one of
the loans!

--

"The game is about glory. It is about doing things in style, with a
flourish, about going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for
them to die of boredom." - Danny Blanchflower

 
 
 

spurs off to good start

Post by Choy Pui Yin Irw » Wed, 24 Aug 1994 03:56:24

Quote:
>Spurs has minus six points at the start of the league because of the
>'poor management' of last season. It is a punishment of FA.

  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Anyone having a more clear explanation for this?

Irwin Choy

 
 
 

spurs off to good start

Post by Techno Mani » Wed, 24 Aug 1994 07:16:30

Quote:

> : spurs are now minus 3 points
> But is your arithmetic a bit different from the norm ? How come they are
> deducted 3 points by winning away from home. Is it a new rule laid down by
> FIFA (just as silly as the red card business for a tackle from behind)

Spurs were fined, kicked out of this years FA Cup, and deducted 6 points from
the start of the season for making 'irregular' payments to players during the
time that Terry Venables was manager.

Oh, dear what a pity !!

Ian the Happy Hammer

--
 ___________________________________________________________________________

|____"""\_""\___""\__""\_""\_""\_""\_""\_""\_Techno Accoustic *** Squad |
|___"""\_""\___""\__""""\____""""\__""""\____          --------------       |
|__"""\_""\___""\_""\_""\____""\__""\_""\____If you're not paranoid, you're |
|_"""\___"""""\____"""\_____""\____"""\______  not paying enough attention  |
|___________________________________________________________________________|

 
 
 

spurs off to good start

Post by Dave du Vergi » Thu, 25 Aug 1994 18:14:01


|> >Spurs has minus six points at the start of the league because of the
|> >'poor management' of last season. It is a punishment of FA.
|>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|> Anyone having a more clear explanation for this?
|>
As has already been pointed out 'poor management' had nothing to do with it. And
for the benefit of the person who mentioned 'tax fraud' I'd reiterate that there
was NO problem with the inland revenue either. I've got a newsletter explaining
the ins and outs of the ruling (and subsequent appeal) which I'll post tomorrow
if I get time.

DdV