Well, you should remember that Sweden really faced an Italian B-
side (8 new players) with little or no interest in the game
while Sweden had to win to have any chance to get through. So it
would've been very strange if Sweden didn't dominate the game.
I think the main reason why Sweden didn't qualify for the
quarters was the lack of a quality goal-scorer. At least a
quality goal-scorer 100% fir for fight. Henke Larsson is an
exceptional player at his best, but to me he showed obvious
signs of not having played competetive games in a while which
was only to be expected. Ljungberg didn't seem to be able to
score no matter what. He had great chances in all 3 games, and
should have been able to score on at least on of them. In my
opinion it was Kennet Andersson who was Sweden's main danger-
man, so I don't think it's strange to play to his strenghts. It
was certainly a boost for Sweden in today's game when he entered
the game.
So after coming into the tournament with many injuries and a bit
unsure of themself Sweden starts off with unconvincingly against
Belgium. I personnaly didn't think they stunk so bad as the
swedish press said. This creates a bit of unrest/turmoil in the
group, the players are given more of a say in the choice of a
strategy and gameplan against Turkey. From the game it didn't
appear that they all agreed on the same strategy, as they played
downright awful. This is where Sweden lost it's place in the
quarters, unfortunatly.
I'm sure you'll bounce back quickly though.
Got questions? Get answers over the phone at Keen.com.
Up to 100 minutes free!
http://www.keen.com