Sport Today

>Check this out though: 9 shots on goal for Liverpool, 7 saves from the
>Middlesborough GK.

>> 0-0.

>> Check this out though: 9 shots on goal for Liverpool, 7 saves from the
>> Middlesborough GK.

> 9-7=0?

>Check this out though: 9 shots on goal for Liverpool, 7 saves from the
>Middlesborough GK. 'Boro have ZERO shots at goal.

>*sigh*

>>> 0-0.

>>> Check this out though: 9 shots on goal for Liverpool, 7 saves from the
>>> Middlesborough GK.

>> 9-7=0?

>Could the other two shot of been blocked by outfield players?

>>> On 18 Nov 2006 10:19:03 -0800, "Google Beta User"

>>>> 0-0.

>>>> Check this out though: 9 shots on goal for Liverpool, 7 saves from the
>>>> Middlesborough GK.
>>> 9-7=0?
>> Could the other two shot of been blocked by outfield players?

> They could have (not "of", please) been, but those aren't generally
> counted as shots on target.

>>>> On 18 Nov 2006 10:19:03 -0800, "Google Beta User"

>>>>> 0-0.

>>>>> Check this out though: 9 shots on goal for Liverpool, 7 saves from the
>>>>> Middlesborough GK.
>>>> 9-7=0?
>>> Could the other two shot of been blocked by outfield players?

>> They could have (not "of", please) been, but those aren't generally
>> counted as shots on target.

>Even say for instance they were cleared off the line?

>>>>> On 18 Nov 2006 10:19:03 -0800, "Google Beta User"

>>>>>> 0-0.

>>>>>> Check this out though: 9 shots on goal for Liverpool, 7 saves from the
>>>>>> Middlesborough GK.
>>>>> 9-7=0?
>>>> Could the other two shot of been blocked by outfield players?
>>> They could have (not "of", please) been, but those aren't generally
>>> counted as shots on target.
>> Even say for instance they were cleared off the line?

> Even so. I've seen a game end 3-1 with 3 shots on target, not counting
> two cleared off the line. Happened last month in a game I was at.

>> I accept my grammatical mistake now accept that you trying to make the
>> original poster look stupid backfired on you.

> bungle, meet sense of humour. Sense of humour, this is bungle. Now go
> get acquainted.

>>>>>> On 18 Nov 2006 10:19:03 -0800, "Google Beta User"

>>>>>>> 0-0.

>>>>>>> Check this out though: 9 shots on goal for Liverpool, 7 saves from the
>>>>>>> Middlesborough GK.
>>>>>> 9-7=0?
>>>>> Could the other two shot of been blocked by outfield players?
>>>> They could have (not "of", please) been, but those aren't generally
>>>> counted as shots on target.
>>> Even say for instance they were cleared off the line?

>> Even so. I've seen a game end 3-1 with 3 shots on target, not counting
>> two cleared off the line. Happened last month in a game I was at.

>You will have to forgive my ignorance here but is a shot cleared of the
>line considered off target then or treated like it didn't happen?

>>>>>>> On 18 Nov 2006 10:19:03 -0800, "Google Beta User"

>>>>>>>> 0-0.

>>>>>>>> Check this out though: 9 shots on goal for Liverpool, 7 saves from the
>>>>>>>> Middlesborough GK.
>>>>>>> 9-7=0?
>>>>>> Could the other two shot of been blocked by outfield players?
>>>>> They could have (not "of", please) been, but those aren't generally
>>>>> counted as shots on target.
>>>> Even say for instance they were cleared off the line?
>>> Even so. I've seen a game end 3-1 with 3 shots on target, not counting
>>> two cleared off the line. Happened last month in a game I was at.
>> You will have to forgive my ignorance here but is a shot cleared of the
>> line considered off target then or treated like it didn't happen?

> IIRC "shots blocked" was a seperate line on the stats.

>Tre...

>> It's the yellow.  That's it.  The Yellow Uniform has GOT to go.