Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Post by ME » Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:12:24


Shows how corrupt F1 is and what an utterly cold character Mad Max is that
he wants to stay as FIA boss. The man has no shame. Equally BE has none
since he sees nothing wrong with it. Maybe they enjoy the same stuff. Is
this the link to Ferrari?

Everywhere he goes from now on (and some places he will not be able to go)
people will simply see an S&M Nazi fantasist and not a representative of F1
etc. If he were PM, he would have resigned immediately and shamed his party
to boot. Odd how Nazis seem to find a home in the Conservative party...

Surely S&MM's behaviour pre and post S&M Nazi epsiode indicates the sort of
person he is and as such should not be head of anything. There are lines in
life across which decent people do not go. Like being a Nazi and a ***.
Seems he does not see the lines. How can he ***ly fanatsise about an
episode in human history which was utterly sick in its carnage of all things
decent and then proceed to say he is fairminded enough to run F1? Would you
trust him?

 
 
 

Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Post by Mike » Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:36:42


Quote:
> Shows how corrupt F1 is and what an utterly cold character Mad Max is that
> he wants to stay as FIA boss. The man has no shame. Equally BE has none
> since he sees nothing wrong with it. Maybe they enjoy the same stuff. Is
> this the link to Ferrari?

> Everywhere he goes from now on (and some places he will not be able to go)
> people will simply see an S&M Nazi fantasist and not a representative of
> F1 etc. If he were PM, he would have resigned immediately and shamed his
> party to boot. Odd how Nazis seem to find a home in the Conservative
> party...

> Surely S&MM's behaviour pre and post S&M Nazi epsiode indicates the sort
> of person he is and as such should not be head of anything. There are
> lines in life across which decent people do not go. Like being a Nazi and
> a ***. Seems he does not see the lines. How can he ***ly fanatsise
> about an episode in human history which was utterly sick in its carnage of
> all things decent and then proceed to say he is fairminded enough to run
> F1? Would you trust him?

Whether he's a depraved *** or not, it has no effect on his ability to
do his job IMO.  However, the fact that everyone who meets him now will have
*those* images in their head and will be unable to take him at all
seriously! How I wish I could have seen Ron Dennis' face on Sunday when he
saw it!

Mike P

 
 
 

Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Post by Alle » Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:54:12

Quote:

> Whether he's a depraved *** or not, it has no effect on his ability to
> do his job IMO.  

Actually, it has - or rather *had*.
The real problem is not what he got up to in his own time behind closed
doors, but the fact that these activities left him wide open to the risk of
blackmail - extortion of monies or services by threat of exposure of those
activities.

Now, I wonder if de Montezemolo was aware of Max's preferences say
mid-August 2007..?

 
 
 

Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Post by Dave Bake » Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:04:00


Quote:



>> Shows how corrupt F1 is and what an utterly cold character Mad Max is
>> that he wants to stay as FIA boss. The man has no shame. Equally BE has
>> none since he sees nothing wrong with it. Maybe they enjoy the same
>> stuff. Is this the link to Ferrari?

>> Everywhere he goes from now on (and some places he will not be able to
>> go) people will simply see an S&M Nazi fantasist and not a representative
>> of F1 etc. If he were PM, he would have resigned immediately and shamed
>> his party to boot. Odd how Nazis seem to find a home in the Conservative
>> party...

>> Surely S&MM's behaviour pre and post S&M Nazi epsiode indicates the sort
>> of person he is and as such should not be head of anything. There are
>> lines in life across which decent people do not go. Like being a Nazi and
>> a ***. Seems he does not see the lines. How can he ***ly fanatsise
>> about an episode in human history which was utterly sick in its carnage
>> of all things decent and then proceed to say he is fairminded enough to
>> run F1? Would you trust him?

> Whether he's a depraved *** or not, it has no effect on his ability to
> do his job IMO.  However, the fact that everyone who meets him now will
> have *those* images in their head and will be unable to take him at all
> seriously! How I wish I could have seen Ron Dennis' face on Sunday when he
> saw it!

And Jackie Stewart's. Max called Stewart a certified halfwit but Stewart can
now call Max a proven sex ***. Must be a nice feeling.
--
Dave Baker
Puma Race Engines
 
 
 

Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Post by gs » Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:09:43

Quote:
> And Jackie Stewart's. Max called Stewart a certified halfwit but Stewart
> can now call Max a proven sex ***. Must be a nice feeling.

What would you rather be, a halfwit or a perv? It's too late for me, I
already opted for halfwit.
 
 
 

Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Post by Alessandro D. Petacci » Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:23:26

Quote:

>Now, I wonder if de Montezemolo was aware of Max's preferences say
>mid-August 2007..?

Brilliant. "Hey Max, I'll tell the press about your weird ***
habits, unless you make one of our eployees give stuff he shouldn't
even have to one of McLaren's employees - and don't forget to forge
all those e-mails between Pedro and the team...What..? What do you
mean "and how the hell am I supposed to do that"?! Do it I say! Or
I'll whip you - er, no, wait..."

ADP.

 
 
 

Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Post by Alle » Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:32:07

Quote:


>>Now, I wonder if de Montezemolo was aware of Max's preferences say
>>mid-August 2007..?

> Brilliant. "Hey Max, I'll tell the press about your weird ***
> habits, unless you make one of our eployees give stuff he shouldn't
> even have to one of McLaren's employees - and don't forget to forge
> all those e-mails between Pedro and the team...What..? What do you
> mean "and how the hell am I supposed to do that"?! Do it I say! Or
> I'll whip you - er, no, wait..."

> ADP.

And your point was?
It's the punishment I'm talking about, not the crime.
Max himself has admitted it was in his power to let McLaren off with a
"clarification", but he chose not to.
 
 
 

Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Post by Alessandro D. Petacci » Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:06:59

Quote:



>>>Now, I wonder if de Montezemolo was aware of Max's preferences say
>>>mid-August 2007..?

>> Brilliant. "Hey Max, I'll tell the press about your weird ***
>> habits, unless you make one of our eployees give stuff he shouldn't
>> even have to one of McLaren's employees - and don't forget to forge
>> all those e-mails between Pedro and the team...What..? What do you
>> mean "and how the hell am I supposed to do that"?! Do it I say! Or
>> I'll whip you - er, no, wait..."

>And your point was?

My point..? Hmm...That you replied to an incredibly stupid post with
something nearly as stupid? Yeah, that was indeed my point.

Quote:
>It's the punishment I'm talking about, not the crime.

Nope. You're talking about your own little universe, which has very
little to do with the real thing. Luckily so, I may add.

ADP.

 
 
 

Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Post by Alle » Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:02:04

Quote:




>>>>Now, I wonder if de Montezemolo was aware of Max's preferences say
>>>>mid-August 2007..?

>>> Brilliant. "Hey Max, I'll tell the press about your weird ***
>>> habits, unless you make one of our eployees give stuff he shouldn't
>>> even have to one of McLaren's employees - and don't forget to forge
>>> all those e-mails between Pedro and the team...What..? What do you
>>> mean "and how the hell am I supposed to do that"?! Do it I say! Or
>>> I'll whip you - er, no, wait..."

>>And your point was?

> My point..? Hmm...That you replied to an incredibly stupid post with
> something nearly as stupid? Yeah, that was indeed my point.

>>It's the punishment I'm talking about, not the crime.

> Nope. You're talking about your own little universe, which has very
> little to do with the real thing. Luckily so, I may add.

> ADP.

I'll ignore your lame flame thanks.

You are showing breathtaking naivety if you actually believe that, in light
of what has been discovered, the possibility has never existed that Max
exposed himself to the potential of blackmail either from within motorsport
or merely standard criminal extortion of the financial kind.

Now, I'm not actually claiming that Ferrari pressurised Max into doling out
the $100M fine with inside knowledge as it were, but that possibility now
exists where it didn't before.

Max has shown an unbelievable error of judgement with his indulgence - does
he have anything else to declare?

 
 
 

Go Mad Max Go Go Go...

Post by Bigbir » Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:23:05

Quote:





> > > > > Now, I wonder if de Montezemolo was aware of Max's
> > > > > preferences say mid-August 2007..?

> >>> Brilliant. "Hey Max, I'll tell the press about your weird ***
> >>> habits, unless you make one of our eployees give stuff he
> shouldn't >>> even have to one of McLaren's employees - and don't
> forget to forge >>> all those e-mails between Pedro and the
> team...What..? What do you >>> mean "and how the hell am I supposed
> to do that"?! Do it I say! Or >>> I'll whip you - er, no, wait..."

> > > And your point was?

> > My point..? Hmm...That you replied to an incredibly stupid post with
> > something nearly as stupid? Yeah, that was indeed my point.

> > > It's the punishment I'm talking about, not the crime.

> > Nope. You're talking about your own little universe, which has very
> > little to do with the real thing. Luckily so, I may add.

> > ADP.

> I'll ignore your lame flame thanks.

> You are showing breathtaking naivety if you actually believe that, in
> light of what has been discovered, the possibility has never existed
> that Max exposed himself to the potential of blackmail either from
> within motorsport or merely standard criminal extortion of the
> financial kind.

> Now, I'm not actually claiming that Ferrari pressurised Max into
> doling out the $100M fine with inside knowledge as it were, but that
> possibility now exists where it didn't before.

> Max has shown an unbelievable error of judgement with his indulgence
> - does he have anything else to declare?

...and if he doesn't is he willing to look Ron Dennis in the eye and
say as much.

--
This space has deliberately not been left blank.
If you would like to advertise here f*ck off!