Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by dave » Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:19:53


Hehe what a joke!

Still within the rules

 
 
 

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by Falcon Frea » Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:25:43


Quote:
> Hehe what a joke!

> Still within the rules

What is your problem? You are the only person who openly ridicules Mark. Is
there something about Mark you know that you are willing to share with this
newsgroup?

FF

 
 
 

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by Falcon Frea » Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:42:55


Quote:



> > Hehe what a joke!

> > Still within the rules

> Schumacher's was worse, he made himself look an even big *** than he
> already is.

And so have you made yourself look like a *** with that comment. So if a
driver spins that then makes them a *** does it? I thought motorsport was
about finding the limit. According to your logic they should drive around at
shopping car park speeds if they do not want to look like ***s.

Dickhead.

FF

 
 
 

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by Falcon Frea » Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:10:49


Quote:





> > > Hehe what a joke!

> > > Still within the rules

> > Schumacher's was worse, he made himself look an even big *** than he
> > already is.

> And so have you made yourself look like a *** with that comment. So if a
> driver spins that then makes them a *** does it? I thought motorsport was
> about finding the limit. According to your logic they should drive around
at
> shopping car park speeds if they do not want to look like ***s.

>***head.

> FF

And he has just outqualified his team mate again. Which in F1 is the first
person you must beat if you wish to be successful.

FF

 
 
 

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by dave » Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:44:40


Quote:



> > Hehe what a joke!

> > Still within the rules

> What is your problem? You are the only person who openly ridicules Mark.
Is
> there something about Mark you know that you are willing to share with
this
> newsgroup?

WHAT! Could you or anyone else please pin point where I have quoted negative
comments on Mark's performance?

I actually rate Mark as one of the best drives (he is also one of the most
friendly chaps I've spoken too), so I'm looking forward to 2005 when he
drives the Williams. Sadly he's not being doing so well recently but that
might be due to poor Jaguar power and the option of leaving the team with
reference to Jaguars status on the championship.

Anyway once again could you please find a quote by myself with negative
reference to Marks performance as you believe I'm the only person who openly
ridicules Mark

 
 
 

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by Alein_ » Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:45:08


Quote:







> > > > Hehe what a joke!

> > > > Still within the rules

> > > Schumacher's was worse, he made himself look an even big *** than he
> > > already is.

> > And so have you made yourself look like a *** with that comment. So if
a
> > driver spins that then makes them a *** does it? I thought motorsport
was
> > about finding the limit. According to your logic they should drive
around
> at
> > shopping car park speeds if they do not want to look like ***s.

> >***head.

Don't get to upset, after all your nothing more than an
autralian-sheep-shagger.

Quote:

> And he has just outqualified his team mate again. Which in F1 is the first
> person you must beat if you wish to be successful.

.....Are you a retard, Rubens-Chump who is ***has outqualified
'gay-schumacher' who couldn't cheat too well today, hence his true average
speed is shown.
 
 
 

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by Falcon Frea » Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:51:15


Quote:









> > > > > Hehe what a joke!

> > > > > Still within the rules

> > > > Schumacher's was worse, he made himself look an even big *** than
he
> > > > already is.

> > > And so have you made yourself look like a *** with that comment. So
if
> a
> > > driver spins that then makes them a *** does it? I thought motorsport
> was
> > > about finding the limit. According to your logic they should drive
> around
> > at
> > > shopping car park speeds if they do not want to look like ***s.

> > >***head.

> Don't get to upset, after all your nothing more than an
> autralian-sheep-shagger.

> > And he has just outqualified his team mate again. Which in F1 is the
first
> > person you must beat if you wish to be successful.

> .....Are you a retard, Rubens-Chump who is ***has outqualified
> 'gay-schumacher' who couldn't cheat too well today, hence his true average
> speed is shown.

"Don't get to upset, after all your nothing more than an
autralian-sheep-shagger"

Great comeback.

Ff

 
 
 

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by Falcon Frea » Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:54:21

Quote:





> > > Hehe what a joke!

> > > Still within the rules

> > What is your problem? You are the only person who openly ridicules Mark.
> Is
> > there something about Mark you know that you are willing to share with
> this
> > newsgroup?

> WHAT! Could you or anyone else please pin point where I have quoted negative
> comments on Mark's performance?

> I actually rate Mark as one of the best drives (he is also one of the most
> friendly chaps I've spoken too), so I'm looking forward to 2005 when he
> drives the Williams. Sadly he's not being doing so well recently but that
> might be due to poor Jaguar power and the option of leaving the team with
> reference to Jaguars status on the championship.

> Anyway once again could you please find a quote by myself with negative
> reference to Marks performance as you believe I'm the only person who openly
> ridicules Mark

Your first post was titled "Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run" and in the body of the post you wrote "Hehe what a joke!" How else were going to read that?

FF

 
 
 

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by F2004: 9 of 10 » Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:29:25



Quote:

>> .....Are you a retard, Rubens-Chump who is ***has outqualified
>> 'gay-schumacher' who couldn't cheat too well today, hence his true average
>> speed is shown.

>"Don't get to upset, after all your nothing more than an
>autralian-sheep-shagger"

>Great comeback.

If you wouldn't quote/respond to this epsilon minus retard wannabe,
many of the rest of us would be spared his infantile excreta.
 
 
 

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by dave » Mon, 12 Jul 2004 02:23:48



Quote:





> > > Hehe what a joke!

> > > Still within the rules

> > What is your problem? You are the only person who openly ridicules Mark.
> Is
> > there something about Mark you know that you are willing to share with
> this
> > newsgroup?

> WHAT! Could you or anyone else please pin point where I have quoted
negative
> comments on Mark's performance?

> I actually rate Mark as one of the best drives (he is also one of the most
> friendly chaps I've spoken too), so I'm looking forward to 2005 when he
> drives the Williams. Sadly he's not being doing so well recently but that
> might be due to poor Jaguar power and the option of leaving the team with
> reference to Jaguars status on the championship.

> Anyway once again could you please find a quote by myself with negative
> reference to Marks performance as you believe I'm the only person who
openly
> ridicules Mark

>Your first post was titled "Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run" and in the

body of the post you wrote "Hehe what a joke!" How else were going to read
that?

I was referring to how the qualifying system currently works. At the time
ITV were showing live footage of Mark doing his quick lap then slowing down.
At that point I decided to post "What a joke" (FIA making the sport look
like a joke) then "Still within the rules" (Mark maximising his
opportunities).

Apart from within this group I've only heard good things about Mark and when
he jumps into that Williams he'll be the biggest threat in the field.

 
 
 

Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run

Post by J.R. » Mon, 12 Jul 2004 03:36:27

Quote:

> >Your first post was titled "Mark Webber: 1st Qualifying run" and in the
> body of the post you wrote "Hehe what a joke!" How else were going to read
> that?

> I was referring to how the qualifying system currently works.

Not that it's your fault, but to save annoying explanation time you may want
to explain that next time :-)

J.R.