>>>>Not that it would do any good, but if Montoya were at complete fault
>>>>for the shunt, why no protest from Ferrari for consideration of future
>>>>penalties? In their press releases and web scribbling's , they have
>>>>made it clear enough that they were innocent of any blame. Me thinks
>>>>they do protest too much?
>>>>Is it they don't want to explain 50 meters of tyre marks?
>>>The FIA are not going to penalize Montoya/Williams.
>>They did so last year, so why not this year?
> Ferrari continued *** in the face of Formula England.
>>It was a racing incident, therefore no penalty was deemed necessary.
> It was not a racing incident, ***wit; it occurred under safety car
> control: Completely inexcusable and unacceptable, it was, by
> definition and regulation, and avoidable accident completely
> chargeable to Montoya putting his meager brain into neutral.
> ....And yet, no sanction.
length of time will flatspot your tyres, so there's no way MS's argument
of "I was just warming my tyres and brakes" is plausible"), and Montoya
was too close. Montoya and MS were trying to out-intimidate each other,
and they both lost out. End of story. But then, you'll never accept the
obvious, cos it's much more fun to go with the *** theorys, isn't
Just for the record, I've not been a Montoya fan since I saw him take
out his team mate for trying to overtake him, when Montoya had only 3
wheels on his wagon in one of the lower formulae, a number of years
back. And he's made a number of stupid mistake in F1, but this incident
was not entirely his fault.
"A One that is not cold, is barely a One at all."