Clarke confirmed as a non-starter.
GM
by alve » Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:17:04
alvey
by willsutto » Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:45:22
> Which means that Watson becomes the first product of Qld grade cricket to get the asterix. Does this explain why he's so attacked by the NSV media?
> alvey
has nothing to do with the fact that he is unable to bowl and has a
batting average worse then Phil Hughes
by alve » Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:59:19
> >> Clarke confirmed as a non-starter.
> > Which means that Watson becomes the first product of Qld grade cricket to get the asterix. Does this explain why he's so attacked by the NSV media?
> > alvey
> \absolutely/
> has nothing to do with the fact that he is unable to bowl and has a
> batting average worse then Phil Hughes
Well played.
alvey
by willsutto » Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:59:37
> GM
will they sit together for tea ?
by willsutto » Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:02:57
>>>> Clarke confirmed as a non-starter.
>>> Which means that Watson becomes the first product of Qld grade cricket to get the asterix. Does this explain why he's so attacked by the NSV media?
>>> alvey
>> \absolutely/
>> has nothing to do with the fact that he is unable to bowl and has a
>> batting average worse then Phil Hughes
> Watson: 36.0
> Hughes: 33.4
> Well played.
he has failed with the bat....................
consistently failed
and with no bowling ...
have we ever had a worse Captain ?
btw: I am pissing myself laughing how Watto is now back to being a
Queenslander
by alve » Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:11:00
> >>>> Clarke confirmed as a non-starter.
> >>> Which means that Watson becomes the first product of Qld grade cricket to get the asterix. Does this explain why he's so attacked by the NSV media?
> >>> alvey
> >> \absolutely/
> >> has nothing to do with the fact that he is unable to bowl and has a
> >> batting average worse then Phil Hughes
> > Watson: 36.0
> > Hughes: 33.4
> > Well played.
> before the tour Hughes had a better average but lets be real
pre Ind tour:
Watson 37.0
Hughes 36.3
alvey
by jzfredrick » Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:15:57
by willsutto » Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:11:54
>>>>>> Clarke confirmed as a non-starter.
>>>>> Which means that Watson becomes the first product of Qld grade cricket to get the asterix. Does this explain why he's so attacked by the NSV media?
>>>>> alvey
>>>> \absolutely/
>>>> has nothing to do with the fact that he is unable to bowl and has a
>>>> batting average worse then Phil Hughes
>>> Watson: 36.0
>>> Hughes: 33.4
>>> Well played.
>> before the tour Hughes had a better average but lets be real
> Could you? It'd make a ***en change.
> pre Ind tour:
> Watson 37.0
> Hughes 36.3
> alvey
Have we had a Captain with a worse record
A queenslander roflmao
1. VVS was 44 behind SRT at the start of the day; now he has overtaken him
3. Scoring 44 and still winning, is this a record?
4. 44 LBWs in 2012 so far (7 Tests)
6. Preview: Game 44: India v Kenya
9. TERRORIST STATE OF PAKISTAN 218 FOR 5 AFTER 44 OVERS
10. Eng 44/3
11. Oh oh -- change of balls does the trick 44/2
13. Ted Dexter : Played 44 Won 9 Retired hurt
14. India vs. Pakistan (after 44/45 overs)