by drif.. » Sun, 01 Aug 2004 10:41:58
by Loony Tune » Sun, 01 Aug 2004 10:48:00
cheers
loony
by Take it eas » Sun, 01 Aug 2004 11:08:54
Takeiteasy.
> cheers
> loony
by Ram Jaa » Sun, 01 Aug 2004 22:48:45
His records also say that he is a bowler who can bat a bit.
Now, as far as bowling is concerned, Aj-Ag beats Flintoff by
a mile! Look at their bowling records in onedayers. No comparisons
at all. As far as test bowling is concerned, Aj-Ag has a match-winning
spell against the best team in the world in its own soil. Flintoff
could muster 5-58 against a 3rd rate team at best!!
Also, Flintoff looked great last summer when he made that 142 against
SA and got MOS. Aggy was nowhere then having missed playing in the
World
Cup. But come Dec, he shook India atleast with his performance in Aus
and shut his critics well. Now, for all of Flintoff's escapades with
the
bat this summer, lets see how Aggy responds later this year in the
season
ahead!!!
But once and for all, lets put this arguement to rest. Agarkar is a
2nd seamer
who can bat a bit in the tail whereas Flintoff is a 4th seamer
all-rounder.
This shouldn't stop us from enjoying their escapades, be it with the
ball or bat. Personally, i think both are coming of age gradually
after having a roller coaster ride at the beginning of their careers
for a few years.
RJ [who likes watching Flintoff bat]
by Dominic Shield » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 02:46:40
by Dominic Shield » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 02:58:30
>>But once and for all, lets put this arguement to rest. Agarkar is a
>>2nd seamer
>>who can bat a bit in the tail whereas Flintoff is a 4th seamer
>>all-rounder.
>Try telling that to Brian Lara
Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w Ct St
Flintoff 37 1689 142 29.63 3 10 77 5/58 38.72 1 23 0
Agarkar 21 420 109* 14.00 1 0 52 6/41 44.34 1 4 0
by Loony Tune » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 03:10:39
<applying standard RSC switch>
Why dont you check Flintoff and Aggy's ODI bowling performances?
After you are done with that, check Flintoff and Aggy's first 15 matches.
They are a true indicator of the potential one has. The rest depends on
whether the selectors let you in, how fit you are, where you play etc etc.
You will spend the next few years of your life doing that to no avail.
cheers
loony
by Kool B » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 10:03:55
> Let Flintoff come up with a performance better than 6-41 AGAINST AUS IN AUS
> and then we will talk.
> Who cares about a useless 167 against a depleted, demoralized, defunct bunch
> of tomato throwers.
> cheers
> loony
by Dominic Shield » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:59:56
><applying standard RSC switch>
>Why dont you check Flintoff and Aggy's ODI bowling performances?
>After you are done with that, check Flintoff and Aggy's first 15 matches.
>They are a true indicator of the potential one has. The rest depends on
>whether the selectors let you in, how fit you are, where you play etc etc.
>You will spend the next few years of your life doing that to no avail.
There is very little point continuing this as before I checked
Statsguru I was convinced from the build-up he was getting that I was
going to find Agarkar had 150 test wickets at 25, the reality is far
more comical.
Does anyone actually watch One Day Internationals any more ? They
killed any interest I once had with these interminable triangular
jokes. If I can be bothered to watch one I genuinely don't care who
wins, they are like fast food, you don't remember one by the next day.
1. CRICKET >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Stanley Cup Finals
3. Kartik >>>>>>> 'Blood sucker'
4. <<<<<<<<<<<< INDIA WINS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
5. <<<<<<<<<<< INDIA WINS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
7. England bowlers >>>>>>> gutterchaap bonda bowlers
8. Ten Doeschate >>>>>>> Ten Dulkar
9. Sachin one step away from becoming >>>>>>> Bradman
10. Yuvraj, Sehwag etc >>>>>>> Dravid
11. <><><> CRICKET MPEG <><><>
12. <><><> Cricket MPEG <><><>
13. <><><><><> CRICKET MPEG <><><><><>
14. <<<<<<<<<<PAK BEATS WI>>>>>>>>>>