Murali 'best bowler ever'

Murali 'best bowler ever'

Post by kalu » Sun, 15 Dec 2002 01:19:13


http://SportToday.org/

Friday, 13 December, 2002, 09:11 GMT Murali 'best bowler ever'
Muttiah Muralitharan has been revealed as the top Test bowler in
history, ranking alongside top batsman Don Bradman, according to
cricket bible Wisden.

Wisden's statistical analysis of every single Test match put the Sri
Lankan three places ahead of his Australian spin rival Shane Warne.

Between them are New Zealand's Richard Hadlee, and Sydney Barnes,
whose 189 for England between 1901/02 - 1913/14 brought an average of
16.43 - the lowest of 20th century Test cricketers.

In 78 Tests, Muralitharan has 437 wickets - third behind Courtney
Walsh and Warne - at an average of 23.52.

His ranking, "emphasises the lone-wolf role he has played in Sri
Lankan cricket for so long," according to Wisden.com editor Steven
***.

Muralitharan, currently in Brisbane with the Sri Lanka side, was
surprised by the news.

"No.1 is a great honour and I don't rank myself so high," he said.

The spinner has been dogged by accusations of throwing, but his
bowling action has been cleared due to a con***ly deformed arm.

"What I have gone through shouldn't happen to any other bowler,
whether it be Brett Lee or Shoaib Akhtar," he said.

"It is very hard to keep going when everyone is looking at you all the
time but everything is past and gone."

Bradman without equal

Bradman is followed by Sachin Tendulkar of India and West Indian pair
Viv Richards and Garfield Sobers. Australia's Allan Border, with the
most Test career runs with 11,174, is fifth.

The list's compilers took such factors as the strength of opposition
and the importance of each performance. Players were also rewarded for
consistency over long careers.

"The expected score for a top performer was around 1000 points - and
The Don managed 1349," said ***.

"Just like his fabulous Test batting average of 99.94, this deservedly
left him way clear of the field."

Wisden caused controversy two years ago when its statistical ranking
of the top 100 Test innings did not include a single appearance by
Indian legend Tendulkar.

Richards was reckoned the best batsman in one-day international
cricket, while Pakistan's Wasim Akram is the best limited-overs
bowler.

Test batting
1 DG Bradman (Aus) 1349.0 pts
2 SR Tendulkar (Ind) 921.5
3 IVA Richards (WI) 913.9
4 GA Sobers (WI) 912.0
5 AR Border (Aus) 911.2

Test bowling
1 M Muralitharan (SL) 1320.4
2 RJ Hadlee (NZ) 1232.9
3 SF Barnes (Eng) 1209.3
4 SK Warne (Aus) 1195.8
5 CV Grimmett (Aus) 1184.8

ODI batting
1 IVA Richards (WI) 1132.5
2 SR Tendulkar (Ind) 1119.3
3 BC Lara (WI) 1036.8
4 DM Jones (Aus) 1022.1
5 MG Bevan (Aus) 1016.7

ODI bowling
1 Wasim Akram (Pak) 1223.5
2 AA Donald (SA) 1180.1
3 Waqar Younis (Pak) 1167.1
4 GD McGrath (Aus) 1165.9
5 J Garner (WI) 1160.7

 
 
 

Murali 'best bowler ever'

Post by Karuval Sunth » Sun, 15 Dec 2002 04:20:41


Quote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/2572069.stm
> Best Bowling Chunker
> 1 M Muralitharan (SL) 1320.4

Thankx Kalu for your understanding

 
 
 

Murali 'best bowler ever'

Post by kalu » Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:34:04

Quote:



>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/2572069.stm

>> Best Bowling Chunker
>> 1 M Muralitharan (SL) 1320.4

> Thankx Kalu for your understanding

Understanding that you can't spell? No probs.

Isn't modifying other people's post considered deceitful? I know that
is how "Mr James" operates, but I thought you might have a little bit
more integrity.

Here's what the BBC article actually had! :-)

"Test bowling
1 M Muralitharan (SL) 1320.4"

kalu

 
 
 

Murali 'best bowler ever'

Post by Raghu Jetle » Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:32:27

Quote:

> Isn't modifying other people's post considered deceitful?

What about altering one's own post ?
This is how it's done.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 22:13:19 +1000


Quote:



> <snip>

> > Lords in May IS typical of English conditions.

> Which Stand are you sitting in?

The BEST seat in the house. In my lounge room watching foxtel!!

Larrikin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Which was then doctored to read
"The BEST seat in the house. In a lounge room watching foxtel!!"

 
 
 

Murali 'best bowler ever'

Post by kalu » Sun, 15 Dec 2002 17:59:43

Quote:


>> Isn't modifying other people's post considered deceitful?

> What about altering one's own post ? This is how it's done.

Does that alter the meaning significantly? ie. He was not seated in
a stand at Lords, but watched it in AUS on foxtel? Furthermore,
without seeing the actual evidence of this on google, I'm not going to
entertain further speculation.

Compare that to K.S. changing:

"Test bowling"

to:

"Best Bowling Chunker"

What's your agenda, Raghu, BTW? hehehehhee

kalu

Quote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> rec.sport.cricket
> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 22:13:19 +1000





>> <snip>

>> > Lords in May IS typical of English conditions.

>> Which Stand are you sitting in?

> The BEST seat in the house. In my lounge room watching foxtel!!

> Larrikin
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Which was then doctored to read
> "The BEST seat in the house. In a lounge room watching foxtel!!"

 
 
 

Murali 'best bowler ever'

Post by Larry de Silv » Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:14:59


Quote:


> >> Isn't modifying other people's post considered deceitful?

> > What about altering one's own post ? This is how it's done.

> Does that alter the meaning significantly? ie. He was not seated in
> a stand at Lords, but watched it in AUS on foxtel? Furthermore,
> without seeing the actual evidence of this on google, I'm not going to
> entertain further speculation.

> Compare that to K.S. changing:

> "Test bowling"

> to:

> "Best Bowling Chunker"

> What's your agenda, Raghu, BTW? hehehehhee

> kalu

Kalu, I have stated MANY TIMES that it was a honest typing error but it
seems that I'm the ONLY one not allowed to make a ***y typo here. Just
their plain stubbornness to accept my reasons. Like I ***y care
anyway..................

Larrikin

- Show quoted text -

Quote:

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

> > rec.sport.cricket
> > Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 22:13:19 +1000





> >> <snip>

> >> > Lords in May IS typical of English conditions.

> >> Which Stand are you sitting in?

> > The BEST seat in the house. In my lounge room watching foxtel!!

> > Larrikin

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

> > Which was then doctored to read
> > "The BEST seat in the house. In a lounge room watching foxtel!!"

 
 
 

Murali 'best bowler ever'

Post by Karuval Sunth » Mon, 16 Dec 2002 03:16:55


Quote:

> >> Best Bowling Chunker
> >> 1 M Muralitharan (SL) 1320.4

> > Thankx Kalu for your understanding

> Understanding that you can't spell? No probs.

> Isn't modifying other people's post considered deceitful? I know that
> is how "Mr James" operates, but I thought you might have a little bit
> more integrity.

Hey Kalu,

I have told u many times that I don't know Inglish. So, I will make spelling
and grammatical mistake not Larryarse who went to Uni on the expense of
Tamils.

Quote:
> Here's what the BBC article actually had! :-)

> "Test bowling
> 1 M Muralitharan (SL) 1320.4"

Thankx to pointing out my integrity like censers by SL????
 
 
 

Murali 'best bowler ever'

Post by Paul Baile » Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:16:35

What a load of SHIT!!!

He is an illegal player in a VERY poor side.


Quote:



> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/2572069.stm

> > Best Bowling Chunker
> > 1 M Muralitharan (SL) 1320.4

> Thankx Kalu for your understanding

 
 
 

Murali 'best bowler ever'

Post by Za » Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:58:23

On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:16:35 +1100, "Paul Bailey"

Quote:

>What a load of SHIT!!!

>He is an illegal player in a VERY poor side.

and it seems you are a bitter knob
Quote:





>> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/2572069.stm

>> > Best Bowling Chunker
>> > 1 M Muralitharan (SL) 1320.4

>> Thankx Kalu for your understanding

 
 
 

Murali 'best bowler ever'

Post by Womba » Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:52:00



<snip>

Quote:
> Kalu, I have stated MANY TIMES that it was a honest typing error but it
> seems that I'm the ONLY one not allowed to make a ***y typo here. Just
> their plain stubbornness to accept my reasons. Like I ***y care
> anyway..................

> Larrikin

And as has been pointed out many times, if you made honestly made a typo, as
you claim, then why did you doctor the subsequent posts and why do you
refuse to admit that you did?

And why won't you answer this question?

Wombat

--