As at 18Mar13: 11 occasions, 41/7/0/143.
Pity that this is beyond Aslam Lawrence.
Pity that this is beyond Aslam Lawrence.
> Pity that this is beyond Aslam Lawrence.
Starc will be just about the most valuable player Australia will have in
the next decade and you just cant handle that
I honestly feel sorry for you
> I've a feeling he's gunna make the Duke sing.
But I cant see our batting mastering their bowling and I think we will
have more batting scorecards like in India then good ones
>> Pity that this is beyond Aslam Lawrence.
> and how many times did the partner take a wicket ?
> Starc will be just about the most valuable player Australia will have in
> the next decade
alvey
>>> As at 18Mar13: 11 occasions, 41/7/0/143.
>>> Pity that this is beyond Aslam Lawrence.
>> and how many times did the partner take a wicket ?
> So the reason why he opens the bowling is *not* to take wickets, it's to
> provide (expensive) support to the bloke at the other end. Gold!
>> Starc will be just about the most valuable player Australia will have in
>> the next decade
> This is based on exactly what? That he's been a total waste of the new ball
> and not much better with old. Have you borrowed the Aust selectors crystal
> ball?
>> and you just cant handle that
> Wrong again William. It's you who can't handle a very small amount of the
> reverse of what the rest of Australia has to put up with.
Starc will succeed and in England he will take quite a few wickets.
Hopefully he will learn some valuable lessons from this tour.
If Starc came from any other State we wouldnt have to read your biased
***and just about everyone knows that.................
>>>> As at 18Mar13: 11 occasions, 41/7/0/143.
>>>> Pity that this is beyond Aslam Lawrence.
>>> and how many times did the partner take a wicket ?
>> So the reason why he opens the bowling is *not* to take wickets, it's to
>> provide (expensive) support to the bloke at the other end. Gold!
> Did I say that. Just would like to know how many times the other opener
> succeeded.
>>> Starc will be just about the most valuable player Australia will have in
>>> the next decade
>> This is based on exactly what? That he's been a total waste of the new ball
>> and not much better with old. Have you borrowed the Aust selectors crystal
>> ball?
> Well it better then your meth.....
>>> and you just cant handle that
>> Wrong again William. It's you who can't handle a very small amount of the
>> reverse of what the rest of Australia has to put up with.
> No. You have a chip the size of Queensland on your shoulder. They could
> drop Starc tomorrow and put Cutting in and I wouldnt lose a minutes sleep.
> Starc will succeed and in England he will take quite a few wickets.
> Hopefully he will learn some valuable lessons from this tour.
> If Starc came from any other State we wouldnt have to read your biased
> ***and just about everyone knows that.................
And for the very last time...Don't assume that everyone has your pitiful
zomboid set of responses. If that's going to remain as your ultimate bleat
then you may as well not post. Unless you're content to look a complete
Phil that is.
alvey
> If Starc came from any other State we wouldnt have to read your biased
> ***and just about everyone knows that.................
>> If Starc came from any other State we wouldnt have to read your biased
>> ***and just about everyone knows that.................
> Very true, because he wouldn't be in the team.
Here's Starc's Shield seasons stats;
Looks like yet another young player "picked on potential" to me.
And yet more "biased" Starc stats. The last ball of the last Ind v Aust
Test was hit for four. This bought Starc's series bowling average to
exactly 100. Strangely, this hasn't been mentioned anywhere in the media.
alvey
>> If Starc came from any other State we wouldnt have to read your biased
>> ***and just about everyone knows that.................
>Very true, because he wouldn't be in the team.
"Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong."
Oscar Wilde
>> Pity that this is beyond Aslam Lawrence.
> and how many times did the partner take a wicket ?
Hilfenhaus 1
Hilfenhaus 1
Hastings 0
Watson 0
Hilfenhaus 0
Siddle 0
Bird 1
Bird 0
Pattinson 2
Siddle 0
Siddle 0
I'd offer slightly different numbers for Starc though - based on my
reading of the Cricinfo cards - 43/7/0/150
His average opening spell in those 11 innings was only 23.45 balls,
but his partners averaged 20 balls collectively - they did bag 5 wkts
though.
> I honestly feel sorry for you
Brian W Lawrence
Wantage
Oxfordshire
>>>>> As at 18Mar13: 11 occasions, 41/7/0/143.
>>>>> Pity that this is beyond Aslam Lawrence.
>>>> and how many times did the partner take a wicket ?
>>> So the reason why he opens the bowling is *not* to take wickets, it's to
>>> provide (expensive) support to the bloke at the other end. Gold!
>> Did I say that. Just would like to know how many times the other opener
>> succeeded.
>>>> Starc will be just about the most valuable player Australia will have in
>>>> the next decade
>>> This is based on exactly what? That he's been a total waste of the new ball
>>> and not much better with old. Have you borrowed the Aust selectors crystal
>>> ball?
>> Well it better then your meth.....
>>>> and you just cant handle that
>>> Wrong again William. It's you who can't handle a very small amount of the
>>> reverse of what the rest of Australia has to put up with.
>> No. You have a chip the size of Queensland on your shoulder. They could
>> drop Starc tomorrow and put Cutting in and I wouldnt lose a minutes sleep.
> Well neither would I William. I would however post yet again about how I
> don't think that Cutting is Test class. That's "traditional" Test class.
> Obviously he's manifoldly a better player than SPIT & Muckswill.
>> Starc will succeed and in England he will take quite a few wickets.
>> Hopefully he will learn some valuable lessons from this tour.
> Indeed, but I can't see how; 'Make myself unavailable for future Indian
> tours." will help Australia.
>> If Starc came from any other State we wouldnt have to read your biased
>> ***and just about everyone knows that.................
> lol. I'm posting bald, un***erated stats on Starc's performance, or
> non-performance as the case is, how can this be biased? If anyone is
> posting bias here that'd be the person who's gushing how Starc "...will be
> just about the most valuable player Australia will have in the next
> decade.". What's that based on then William?
> And for the very last time...Don't assume that everyone has your pitiful
> zomboid set of responses. If that's going to remain as your ultimate bleat
> then you may as well not post. Unless you're content to look a complete
> Phil that is.
>> If Starc came from any other State we wouldnt have to read your biased
>> ***and just about everyone knows that.................
> Very true, because he wouldn't be in the team.
Now Marsh and Bichel would know more about fast bowling on a bad day
then either you or Al on your best ever day
>> <snip>
>>> If Starc came from any other State we wouldnt have to read your biased
>>> ***and just about everyone knows that.................
>> Very true, because he wouldn't be in the team.
>Yessss welllll.
>Here's Starc's Shield seasons stats;
>Looks like yet another young player "picked on potential" to me.
I wouldn't be all that surprised if he turns out quite a good bowler
in the end. Doesn't really look up to the big time yet, though.
Cheers,
Mike
--
5. Mitchell Johnson & Dan Cullen
6. NSV parachutes in Mitchell Johnson
7. Mitchell Johnson - Saviour of Aussies
8. Mitchell Johnson bowled a beaut of an over
9. Video - Mitchell Johnson's record-breaking 26 off the Poor Harris over
10. Mitchell Johnson - I just don't get him
11. Mitchell Johnson the sledger
12. Mitchell Johnson does a Zidane on Styris
13. How rubbish is Mitchell Johnson?
14. How good is Mitchell Marsh.