by ...Is calling someone a monkey worse than calling someone a bastar$,
his mother a biatch, and invoking ***ious connotations?
Aren't aussies ashamed and acting like eunuchs with bangles in their
hands, a she-male type of a deal...sir pandyan?
Aussies have been sledging over the years and now all of a sudden they
feel all oh so touchy touchy about what is spoken on the field between
two people?
come on she-males settles this on the field...someone calls u a bastar
$,...someone else calls someone else a monkey....***y hell call him
back with a chimp or a bafoon...grow up...shame on symonds and the
whole aussie team to have acted like she-male type bangle breaking
eunuchs and taking this out of the field when they have been doing the
eunuch dance on the field so far...rattled arent we?
ps: in bigger prospective...can a black man racially abuse white man
in the same manner a white man can racially abuse a black man? can a
BROWN man racially abuse another brown(non white) man the same way as
a white man can abuse a brown(non white) man?
ps2: shouldnt we get confused with the difference of impact between
the two keeping history as a backdrop because racial abuse is always
measured with a hostorical backdrop between the two races involved :)
Dont we all hail from the monkey race?
You monkeys!
;)