Big 4 vs Big 4

Big 4 vs Big 4

Post by Chan Fonse » Wed, 08 May 2002 04:34:43


SRT vs Lara
Ganguly vs Hooper
Dravid vs Chanderpaul
Laxman vs Sarwan

pretty evenly matched, no?

Chan

 
 
 

Big 4 vs Big 4

Post by Madhusudan Sing » Wed, 08 May 2002 00:41:02

On Monday 06 May 2002 19:34, Chan Fonseka, purporting to be

Quote:
> SRT vs Lara

Pretty even so far, even though neither of them is inspiring as much
confidence as they usually do.

Quote:
> Ganguly vs Hooper

Definite improvement by Ganguly, but due to reprieves and more runs, Hooper
is ahead.

Quote:
> Dravid vs Chanderpaul

At the end of T2, it was even. Now in favour of Chanderpaul.

Quote:
> Laxman vs Sarwan

Quite even. Though I would pick Sarwan any day when you could not afford to
fail.

 
 
 

Big 4 vs Big 4

Post by yeska » Wed, 08 May 2002 05:45:00

Quote:

> SRT vs Lara

SRT: 79, 117 & 0, 0 & 8
Lara: 0,  52 & 47, 55

Pretty even with Lara > SRT in matches under pressure as in
T2 Lara >> T3 SRT

Quote:
> Ganguly vs Hooper

Ganguly: 5, 25 & 75*, 48 & 60*
Hooper: 233, 50 & 22, 115

I should say pretty even with SCG > Hooper in crucial matches because
SCG T3 > Hooper T2

Quote:
> Dravid vs Chanderpaul

RD: 144, 67 & 36, 17 & 14
Chanderpaul: 149, 1 & 67*, 101

Chanderpaul >>> RD!

Quote:
> Laxman vs Sarwan

Laxman: 69, 69 & 74, 1 and 43
Sarwan: 53, 35 & 41, 60

Almost even, I should say. But Sarwan looks more consistent.

 
 
 

Big 4 vs Big 4

Post by Madhusudan Sing » Wed, 08 May 2002 04:06:03


thought it fit to write:

Quote:



>> On Monday 06 May 2002 19:34, Chan Fonseka, purporting to be

>> > SRT vs Lara

>> Pretty even so far, even though neither of them is inspiring as much
>> confidence as they usually do.

>> > Ganguly vs Hooper

>> Definite improvement by Ganguly, but due to reprieves and more runs,
> Hooper
>> is ahead.

>> > Dravid vs Chanderpaul

>> At the end of T2, it was even. Now in favour of Chanderpaul.

>> > Laxman vs Sarwan

>> Quite even. Though I would pick Sarwan any day when you could not afford
> to
>> fail.
>> Sarwin is only 22

Which could be taken as a measure of how much Laxman underperforms.