Mark "the useless" Ramprakash

Mark "the useless" Ramprakash

Post by Stephen A Deva » Fri, 22 Aug 1997 04:00:00



Quote:

>The subject says it all. I never understand why the England cricket
>selectors keep on toying with the idea that Mark "the useless"
>Ramprakash will deliver. He is just not of Test class. All this
>non-sense talk of him being imensely talented should now be confined
>to rubbish bin. You prove your talent by performing at the highest
>level. And he has proved how "talented" he is. He should never play
>for England again. If they had to drop John Crawley, then why could
>not they bring in one young *** instead of giving Mr Failure one
>more chance. I hope he gets a "duck" in the second inings and shuts
>the door on himself for ever.

>Razee

No!  At least a 50!  It's VERY important that he make the tour side for
WI!

Fraternally in cricket,

Steve the Bajan

 
 
 

Mark "the useless" Ramprakash

Post by Lorraine Trewhell » Sat, 23 Aug 1997 04:00:00

On the subject of the same team, why wasn't Tufnell included sooner?
Or is his good start just a fluke?

Lorraine.

--
EAT MORE PRUNES!

 
 
 

Mark "the useless" Ramprakash

Post by Ike » Sun, 24 Aug 1997 04:00:00

I said from day one of this series that the mistake england are making is
leaving out tuffnell. He is a real toughie, with the right roughie
temperament that is need for test level competitive cricket and esp playing
against toughies like the Aussies. There are too many softies in the
England camp. Even the Aussies resp Tufnell.

A test class bowler. A definite must have in any test side.
--

Ike Ugochuku MCPS, MCSE
Consulting Systems Engineer



Quote:

> On the subject of the same team, why wasn't Tufnell included sooner?
> Or is his good start just a fluke?

> Lorraine.

> --
> EAT MORE PRUNES!