3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by Ashe » Thu, 01 Apr 1999 04:00:00


3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tie.
One of the scorers incorrectly forgot to add a no ball
early in the first session.

So scores are now level.
It's now been called a tied test.

There has been outrage in the WI today as the announcement
was made. Some are calling for a extra day's play to finish the
game.

 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by vijaykum.. » Thu, 01 Apr 1999 04:00:00



Quote:

> 3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tie.
> One of the scorers incorrectly forgot to add a no ball
> early in the first session.

> So scores are now level.
> It's now been called a tied test.

> There has been outrage in the WI today as the announcement
> was made. Some are calling for a extra day's play to finish the
> game.

Quite a few no-balls, it would seem. Since Windies finished 4 runs ahead.
And your message is posted one day ahead of schedule.

This brings me to an interesting feature which I saw in Barbados (that's
right, I live in Barbados. And no, sob!, I didn't see the match, being tied
down to my chair in the office). One day when we were playing a cricket match
here, the scorer had two score books and one transistor radio in front of
him. One score book was for the match we were currently engaged in, and the
second was for the WI-Sri Lanka match then being played in the Windies. After
that I have seen it more frequently with fans & followers keeping score by
themselves as well, while following the match on radio.

I also think that there is no longer one scorer for matches, there usually are
multiple - one for the TV crew, one for the radio crew, one 'official' scorer,
one perhaps for each of the teams playing. Did all of them get it wrong?

Happy all fools day yourself.

Vijay

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by Eitan Princ » Thu, 01 Apr 1999 04:00:00

: 3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tie.
: One of the scorers incorrectly forgot to add a no ball
: early in the first session.

: So scores are now level.
: It's now been called a tied test.

: There has been outrage in the WI today as the announcement
: was made. Some are calling for a extra day's play to finish the
: game.

April fool's? :)

Eitan
--
                   Eitan Prince
                   *    *    *
                Rhodes University
====================================================
"How can I put it?  Life is like video footage
 Hard to edit, directors, that never understood it"
                                - Robert Diggs -
====================================================

 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by Prashant Murt » Thu, 01 Apr 1999 04:00:00

Quote:

> 3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tie. One of the
> scorers incorrectly forgot to add a no ball early in the first
> session.

> So scores are now level. It's now been called a tied test.

> There has been outrage in the WI today as the announcement was made.
> Some are calling for a extra day's play to finish the game.

Hey! It may be April 1st already in Australia but here its still plain old
March 31st... Nice try anyway.

Prashant

 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by Ashe » Thu, 01 Apr 1999 04:00:00

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tie.
One of the scorers incorrectly forgot to add a no ball
early in the first session.

So scores are now level.
It's now been called a tied test.

There has been outrage in the WI today as the announcement
was made. Some are calling for a extra day's play to finish the
game.

yaD slooF lirpA

 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by John Hal » Thu, 01 Apr 1999 04:00:00


Quote:

>I also think that there is no longer one scorer for matches, there usually are
>multiple - one for the TV crew, one for the radio crew, one 'official' scorer,
>one perhaps for each of the teams playing. Did all of them get it wrong?

There are two official scorers in any match (or should be), one from
each side. It is their responsibility to ensure that their scores tally
with each other.
--
John Hall  "He crams with cans of poisoned meat
            The subjects of the King,
            And when they die by thousands     G.K.Chesterton:
            Why, he laughs like anything."     from "Song Against Grocers"
 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by Sanjeev Kuma » Thu, 01 Apr 1999 04:00:00

It's already April 1st in Oz, but not yet out here in US.
So, Dream On! Kid.

Sanjeev

Quote:

> 3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tie.
> One of the scorers incorrectly forgot to add a no ball
> early in the first session.

> So scores are now level.
> It's now been called a tied test.

> There has been outrage in the WI today as the announcement
> was made. Some are calling for a extra day's play to finish the
> game.

 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by Arawa » Fri, 02 Apr 1999 04:00:00



Quote:

> 3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tie.
> One of the scorers incorrectly forgot to add a no ball
> early in the first session.

> So scores are now level.
> It's now been called a tied test.

> There has been outrage in the WI today as the announcement
> was made. Some are calling for a extra day's play to finish the
> game.

Good thing Our Man hit a four to win it when only a single was needed. Still
room for a couple more missed no balls......

Arawak

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by Wedge Antille » Fri, 02 Apr 1999 04:00:00

no, it wasn't tied. Even if there HAD been an extra no ball for the Aussies,
the Windies won by more than 1 run (3 in fact) so they'd still have won.

later,
Wedge

Quote:

>3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tie.
>One of the scorers incorrectly forgot to add a no ball
>early in the first session.

>So scores are now level.
>It's now been called a tied test.

>There has been outrage in the WI today as the announcement
>was made. Some are calling for a extra day's play to finish the
>game.

 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by Ashe » Fri, 02 Apr 1999 04:00:00

On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 19:53:58 +0100, John Hall

Quote:



>>I also think that there is no longer one scorer for matches, there usually are
>>multiple - one for the TV crew, one for the radio crew, one 'official' scorer,
>>one perhaps for each of the teams playing. Did all of them get it wrong?

>There are two official scorers in any match (or should be), one from
>each side. It is their responsibility to ensure that their scores tally
>with each other.

At the end of the post I had "yaD slooF lirpA"
What does this read backwards.
And what is today's special date?
 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by Timmy the Mediocr » Fri, 02 Apr 1999 04:00:00

eno ecin. (:



Quote:

> 3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tie.
> One of the scorers incorrectly forgot to add a no ball
> early in the first session.

> So scores are now level.
> It's now been called a tied test.

> There has been outrage in the WI today as the announcement
> was made. Some are calling for a extra day's play to finish the
> game.

> yaD slooF lirpA

 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by John Hal » Fri, 02 Apr 1999 04:00:00


Quote:

>On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 19:53:58 +0100, John Hall



>>>I also think that there is no longer one scorer for matches, there usually are
>>>multiple - one for the TV crew, one for the radio crew, one 'official' scorer,
>>>one perhaps for each of the teams playing. Did all of them get it wrong?

>>There are two official scorers in any match (or should be), one from
>>each side. It is their responsibility to ensure that their scores tally
>>with each other.

>At the end of the post I had "yaD slooF lirpA"
>What does this read backwards.
>And what is today's special date?

I'm well aware that your original post was an April Fool (quite a good
one too), but that doesn't prevent me addressing something of interest
that arises out of subsequent discussion.
--
John Hall  Weep not for little Leonie
           Abducted by a French Marquis!
           Though loss of honour was a wrench
           Just think how it's improved her French.   Harry Graham (1874-1936)
 
 
 

3rd test WI Vs Aus - error in scores - match now a tied test

Post by S Jagadis » Fri, 02 Apr 1999 04:00:00

Quote:
> Hey! It may be April 1st already in Australia but here its still plain old
> March 31st... Nice try anyway.

so ? who asked u to see this post on mar 31 ;)

jagadish
--
"We're going to bounce back. We've got them in two years' time and, I
promise you, we'll not be losing."
                                Brian Charles Lara, Perth, February 1997

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own