by Paji » Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:00:54
Look at this bizzare situation folks- Flintoff is bowling to Warne.
It should be the other way- and in fact, Warne to Flintoff to
Sightscreen.
why can't we get some good batsmen to the crease...when will cricket
understand the need to be in step and toe with today and not 100 years
in the past.
by Andrew Dunfor » Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:11:35
> Look at this bizzare situation folks- Flintoff is bowling to Warne.
> It should be the other way- and in fact, Warne to Flintoff to
> Sightscreen.
> why can't we get some good batsmen to the crease...when will cricket
> understand the need to be in step and toe with today and not 100 years
> in the past.
Andrew
by alvey_nastystains_yahoo,com.a » Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:24:59
>> Look at this bizzare situation folks- Flintoff is bowling to Warne.
>> It should be the other way- and in fact, Warne to Flintoff to
>> Sightscreen.
>> why can't we get some good batsmen to the crease...when will cricket
>> understand the need to be in step and toe with today and not 100 years
>> in the past.
> It might be time to consider that your opinion on this matter isn't
> necessarily shared by the majority of cricket fans.
alvey
by Mike Holman » Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:33:32
>>> Look at this bizzare situation folks- Flintoff is bowling to Warne.
>>> It should be the other way- and in fact, Warne to Flintoff to
>>> Sightscreen.
>>> why can't we get some good batsmen to the crease...when will cricket
>>> understand the need to be in step and toe with today and not 100 years
>>> in the past.
>> It might be time to consider that your opinion on this matter isn't
>> necessarily shared by the majority of cricket fans.
>Could you share what the OP's opinion is?
Cheers,
Mike
--
by Andrew Dunfor » Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:45:21
>>> Look at this bizzare situation folks- Flintoff is bowling to Warne.
>>> It should be the other way- and in fact, Warne to Flintoff to
>>> Sightscreen.
>>> why can't we get some good batsmen to the crease...when will cricket
>>> understand the need to be in step and toe with today and not 100 years
>>> in the past.
>> It might be time to consider that your opinion on this matter isn't
>> necessarily shared by the majority of cricket fans.
> Could you share what the OP's opinion is?
Andrew
by alvey_nastystains_yahoo,com.a » Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:09:01
>>>> Look at this bizzare situation folks- Flintoff is bowling to Warne.
>>>> It should be the other way- and in fact, Warne to Flintoff to
>>>> Sightscreen.
>>>> why can't we get some good batsmen to the crease...when will cricket
>>>> understand the need to be in step and toe with today and not 100 years
>>>> in the past.
>>> It might be time to consider that your opinion on this matter isn't
>>> necessarily shared by the majority of cricket fans.
>> Could you share what the OP's opinion is?
> The gist is that should be about real bowlers bowling to real batsmen, and
> that anything else is a waste of time. This would be achieved by having
> enlarged squads in order that each team could play eleven specialist batsmen
> and a whole battery of quick bowlers who would be given a new ball every
> couple of overs, or something.
by Wog?Georg » Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:32:47
> Look at this bizzare situation folks- Flintoff is bowling to Warne.
> It should be the other way- and in fact, Warne to Flintoff to
> Sightscreen.
> why can't we get some good batsmen to the crease...when will cricket
> understand the need to be in step and toe with today and not 100 years
> in the past.
--
George
"If I was a towel, why would I be wearing this hat and this fake
moustache" - Steven McTowelie - 19 April 2006
by Mad Hamis » Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:08:44
>> Look at this bizzare situation folks- Flintoff is bowling to Warne.
>> It should be the other way- and in fact, Warne to Flintoff to
>> Sightscreen.
>> why can't we get some good batsmen to the crease...when will cricket
>> understand the need to be in step and toe with today and not 100 years
>> in the past.
>It might be time to consider that your opinion on this matter isn't
>necessarily shared by the majority of cricket fans.
Mad Hamish
Hamish Laws
1. On Warne's bowling...I think he was bowling as good as he was bowling
2. England without Jones and Flintoff and Australia without McGrath and Warne
4. What about Flintoff's bowling action?
5. Flintoff's bowling action reported
6. Flintoff bowled all through post tea session
7. Flintoff scared of bowling to Basher
10. Does Warne bowl better with May or McGrath?
11. Warne bowling badly-- not injured
12. Did anyone see Warne bowl??
13. MacGill Vs Warne [was: MacGill bowled into side] (fwd)
14. Sachin, Navjot hardest to bowl to: Warne