Quote:
>A friend of mine and I were talking, and we've already forgotten the
>10 official ways of getting out. So how about those other, back yard,
>ways, then?
My brother and I used to play French Cricket in our (reasonably sizeable)
back garden, and we had several interesting ways of getting out. There was
only the two of us, so we needed a few extra ways to keep the batting
rotating pretty quickly between us!
"Moving your feet without hitting the ball" (MYFWHTB) was one way of
getting out. It was considered to be cheating if, once you'd missed the
ball, you moved your feet to prevent yourself from being bowled (in French
Cricket, your legs are the stumps). You were allowed to move your feet if
you hit the ball though.
This rule had interesting implications. If the bowler was at the other end
of the garden, it was traditional to adopt a normal cricket stance (as
opposed to a French one, facing the bowler with the bat guarding the legs).
Straight-driving back to the bowler was acceptable, but obviously this
meant moving your legs. So you had to be pretty sure you were going to hit
the ball before moving!
"Two swipes" was another unconventional dismissal. You weren't allowed to
even *attempt* the hit the ball twice -- otherwise if you'd missed the ball
and moved your feet to prevent yourself being bowled, you could just chase
after the ball and hit it again to avoid being out MYFWHTB.
But the best way was "OQ" -- "Opposite Quarters". The garden was
subdivided into four zones, like a Cartesian grid with the batsman standing
at the origin (spot the Maths teacher!). If the bowler bowled from one
quarter, and the batsman hit the ball (via a sweep, say) to the opposite
quarter, that was out.
The main reason why this rule was introduced was to save the bowler chasing
all the way round the garden! But it had three useful consequences:
(a) Most edged strokes were out under this rule
(b) If you wanted to sweep, you had to guide the ball through at least 180
degrees -- which encouraged good control; and
(c) The bowler had an incentive to bowl accurately. If you, as a batsman,
saw the ball was going fast and wide of you, you had the option of leaving
it well alone -- which would mean a long chase for the bowler. So the
bowler had to be accurate if they were going to bowl fast!
Ah, happy days. Thanks for asking the question and giving me the excuse to
indulge in some nostalgia!
Stephen.