Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by kathyb1.. » Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:00:39


Ever since England gained a lead of 129 in 1st innings of this test, I
just love the way
some of Indian RSCer (not all of them) are reacting.......

1) Hit the panic button......Sky is falling...sky is falling...sky is
falling......
2) Shitting in their pants........or is it diapers.......
3) Calling for Dravid's head.
4) ***ing, moaning and whining about fielders dropping "world record"
catches!
5) ***ing, moaning and whining about umpiring - as usual.
6) ***ing, moaning and whining about the faliure of their supposedly
"best" batting line up in the world - as usual.
7) Already counting the head to be chopped for this loss - if India
loses.
8) Prediction by the minutes....

Hey, chill out guys...this is just Cricket....."game by
chance"..........India is not OUT
of this game yet. It can easily draw the game - if not win.
......and even if India loses,freaking big deal. You can't win every
freaking game unless you
are WI from 1975-85 or Aus of 1995-2005.  Does India even closely
resemble those
2 teams.....??  If not then relax and your team (or any team for that
matter), it bound to play
"bad" on a few days....(or quite a few days, if you are Indian "fan").
;-)
Why can't you accept the bitter pill that Indian team does not consist
of supermen...no matter how much you think, they are!  It is an average
and will have an average days/matches,,,no matter what you
think/believe!

Stop complaining and panicing and give England's totally depleted side
"some" credit that they played better than Indian team!

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by Sanja » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:32:00


Quote:
> Ever since England gained a lead of 129 in 1st innings of this test, I
> just love the way
> some of Indian RSCer (not all of them) are reacting.......

> 1) Hit the panic button......Sky is falling...sky is falling...sky is
> falling......
> 2) Shitting in their pants........or is it diapers.......
> 3) Calling for Dravid's head.
> 4) ***ing, moaning and whining about fielders dropping "world record"
> catches!
> 5) ***ing, moaning and whining about umpiring - as usual.
> 6) ***ing, moaning and whining about the faliure of their supposedly
> "best" batting line up in the world - as usual.
> 7) Already counting the head to be chopped for this loss - if India
> loses.
> 8) Prediction by the minutes....

> Hey, chill out guys...this is just Cricket....."game by
> chance"..........India is not OUT
> of this game yet. It can easily draw the game - if not win.
> ......and even if India loses,freaking big deal. You can't win every
> freaking game unless you
> are WI from 1975-85 or Aus of 1995-2005.  Does India even closely
> resemble those
> 2 teams.....??  If not then relax and your team (or any team for that
> matter), it bound to play
> "bad" on a few days....(or quite a few days, if you are Indian "fan").
> ;-)
> Why can't you accept the bitter pill that Indian team does not consist
> of supermen...no matter how much you think, they are!  It is an average
> and will have an average days/matches,,,no matter what you
> think/believe!

> Stop complaining and panicing and give England's totally depleted side
> "some" credit that they played better than Indian team!

*** kathy1240 aka JJ,

Why are you so OBSSESSED and BOTHERED about Indian fans and Indian cricket ?

Does your INDIAN MANAGER treat you like SHIT ?

You are suffering from SEVERE INFERIORITY COMPLEX. Go see a SHRINK.

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by kathyb1.. » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 04:54:12

Quote:
>>>You are suffering from SEVERE INFERIORITY COMPLEX.

me....inferiority complex..?? with a 63-39 ODI records against your
might team and 12-8 record in test.......are you kidding me??

Seem like you'll die stupid!

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by Sanja » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 05:05:45


Quote:
>>>>You are suffering from SEVERE INFERIORITY COMPLEX.

> me....inferiority complex..?? with a 63-39 ODI records against your
> might team and 12-8 record in test.......are you kidding me??

*** kathy1240 aka JJ,

You still didnt answer the question.

Why are you so OBSSESSED and BOTHERED about Indian fans and Indian cricket ?

Does your INDIAN MANAGER treat you like SHIT ?

You are suffering from SEVERE INFERIORITY COMPLEX. Go see a SHRINK.

Quote:
> Seem like you'll die stupid!

You have posted so MANY comments EXPOSING your IMMATURITY, POOR cricket
knowledge, POOR logic, POOR english comprehension and POOR analytical
ability in the last few days and GOT YOUR ASS KICKED ROYALLY and you
SHAMELESSLY continue to do the same.

Who can be more STUPID than you comparing a SEAMER Asif and batsman Cook to
bowlers Udal and Panesars bowling ability ?

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by kathyb1.. » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 05:26:07

Quote:
>>Who can be more STUPID than you comparing a SEAMER Asif and batsman Cook to
>>bowlers Udal and Panesars bowling ability ?

You your IQ, I don't even EXPECT you to understand my comment!

Quote:
>>Does your INDIAN MANAGER treat you like SHIT ?

No, he was sent to Banglore to manage a call center......aftre he
learned to say ...."may I help you, sir??"
It was difficult, but he managed it somehow!  ;-)

Quote:
>>You have posted so MANY comments EXPOSING your IMMATURITY, POOR cricket
>>knowledge, POOR logic, POOR english comprehension and POOR analytical

At least I don't think all RSCer (beside you) don't know anything -
like you do!
Didn't you just call two poster, liers?
 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by Sanja » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 05:33:10


Quote:
>>>Who can be more STUPID than you comparing a SEAMER Asif and batsman Cook
>>>to
>>>bowlers Udal and Panesars bowling ability ?

> You your IQ, I don't even EXPECT you to understand my comment!

*** kathyb1240 aka JJ,

Please explain to readers the logic in your comparing Seamer Asif and
batsman Cook to Udal and Panesar bowling ability to skittle out India.

Quote:
>>>Does your INDIAN MANAGER treat you like SHIT ?
> No, he was sent to Banglore to manage a call center......aftre he
> learned to say ...."may I help you, sir??"
> It was difficult, but he managed it somehow!  ;-)

Are you JEALOUS, you are NOT MADE a MANAGER ?

Quote:
>>>You have posted so MANY comments EXPOSING your IMMATURITY, POOR cricket
>>>knowledge, POOR logic, POOR english comprehension and POOR analytical

> At least I don't think all RSCer (beside you) don't know anything -
> like you do!
> Didn't you just call two poster, liers?

I DIDN'T call them liars.

I asked them to STOP LYING about (the "INSTANCE") NON-EXISTENT laxman's
dropped catches in mumbai test.

You need to enroll in English comprehension and logic courses in your local
community college.

So which color PANTIES are you wearing today Mr kathy ?

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by kathyb1.. » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 05:44:21

Quote:
>> I DIDN'T call them liars.
>>I asked them to STOP LYING about (the "INSTANCE") NON-EXISTENT laxman's
>>dropped catches in mumbai test.

Here is another example of you ZERO-IQ......let me explain.....

Now, who do you asked to STOP LYING??? The person who is LYING???  So,
what is
the person who is LYING??   Again...it might too hard for to
understand!

About 10,000th time.....please tell me your age and I promise, I'll
keep your age in mind
before saying ANYTHING to you directly!

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by Sanja » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:29:38


Quote:
>>> I DIDN'T call them liars.
>>>I asked them to STOP LYING about (the "INSTANCE") NON-EXISTENT laxman's
>>>dropped catches in mumbai test.

> Here is another example of you ZERO-IQ......let me explain.....

> Now, who do you asked to STOP LYING??? The person who is LYING???  So,
> what is
> the person who is LYING??   Again...it might too hard for to
> understand!

*** kathyb1240 aka JJ,

Only IMMATURE LOW IQ ***S like you will LABEL a human being a LIAR
for such SIMPLE THINGS as lying about somebodys DROPPED CATCH.

Gafools lying about this PARTICULAR dropped catch will NOT AFFECT, DESTROY
or CHANGE anybodys LIFE financially, emotionally or otherwise. So there is
NO NEED to CALL a person a LIAR for such SILLY REASONS.

I used the word STOP LYING to indicate to the poster ONLY in this particular
instance. But then you wont understand the logic with your IMMATURE, JUMPING
TO CONCLUSIONS , LOW IQ RANSVESTITE brain.

Besides you are HIJACKING this thread as usual to peddle your drivel.

Laxman did NOT drop any catch. Case closed.

Quote:
> About 10,000th time.....please tell me your age and I promise, I'll
> keep your age in mind
> before saying ANYTHING to you directly!

You have PROVED and CONFIRMED a MILLION TIMES you are a LOW IQ, IMMATURE,
IDIOTIC, STUPID, ILLOGICAL, CONFUSED, INFANTILE, INDIA HATING ***.

So which color PANTIES are you wearing today Mr kathy ?

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by Mithrandi » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:21:40


Quote:
> Stop complaining and panicing and give England's totally depleted side
> "some" credit that they played better than Indian team!

More depleted than the current Indian side with an injured Sehwag and now an
injured Sachin?
 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by Andrew Dunfor » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:40:19


Quote:



> > Stop complaining and panicing and give England's totally depleted side
> > "some" credit that they played better than Indian team!

> More depleted than the current Indian side with an injured Sehwag and now
an
> injured Sachin?

Yes.

Andrew

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by Sanja » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:46:11


Quote:





>> > Stop complaining and panicing and give England's totally depleted side
>> > "some" credit that they played better than Indian team!

>> More depleted than the current Indian side with an injured Sehwag and now
> an
>> injured Sachin?

> Yes.

> Andrew

Vaughan and Trescos replacements Cook and Collingwood scored two centuries.

I dont think V and T would have done any better.

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by Simon Pleasant » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:58:18

Quote:

>Vaughan and Trescos replacements Cook and Collingwood scored two centuries.

>I dont think V and T would have done any better.

Relative to the first choice lineup:

- The captain is missing.
- The stand in captain is missing.
- The opening partnership is broken.
- The opening partnership is then broken again.
- A middle order batsman, struggling to keep his place is now opening.
- The highest ranked batsman is missing, who also was in the top 2 in the
averages for the previous 4 series is missing.
- The opening bowling partnership is broken.
- One of the key bowlers to England's success in recent years is missing.
- The top bowler from the Ashes series is missing.

Hard to see how the above could not be a little disruptive for England.

Bowling lineup (preferred / actual):

Hoggard, Harmison, Flintoff, Jones, Giles.
Hoggard, Anderson, Flintoff, Udal, Panesar

Batting lineup (preferred / actual):

Tresco, Strauss, Vaughan, Bell, Pietersen, Flintoff
Strauss, Bell, Shah, Pietersen, Collingwood, Flintoff

As I said, it's bad enough that the captain is missing, but to have so many
key players missing too, and others playing out of order does not help.
Continuity and experience count for a lot, you know.  That some of the
replacements have done well merely goes to show how different this England
outfit is than the one of the 1990s.

Simon.

NEW! Australia & New Zealand Travel Forums - just opened
http://forum.plesbit.net

--
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by shariq_ta.. » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:08:51

Quote:

> Vaughan and Trescos replacements Cook and Collingwood scored two centuries.

> I dont think V and T would have done any better.

Although Cook was Vaughn's replacement, Owais Shah was Trescothick's.
Collingwood was quite good in the series against Pakistan and a hard
player to disodge

Shariq

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by shariq_ta.. » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:08:57

Quote:

> Vaughan and Trescos replacements Cook and Collingwood scored two centuries.

> I dont think V and T would have done any better.

Although Cook was Vaughn's replacement, Owais Shah was Trescothick's.
Collingwood was quite good in the series against Pakistan and a hard
player to disodge

Shariq

 
 
 

Sky is falling....sky is falling...sky is falling....

Post by Jim L » Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:48:21

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:58:18 +0000, Simon Pleasants

Quote:

>Batting lineup (preferred / actual):

>Tresco, Strauss, Vaughan, Bell, Pietersen, Flintoff
>Strauss, Bell, Shah, Pietersen, Collingwood, Flintoff

It maybe your preferred, but I don't think Bell would be in many.

Jim.