> Shah Rukh Khan has given a lot of hits in the past few
> years, especially the last 2-3 has been giving many
> blockbusters. But mostly stupid films enjoyed by
> stupid folks like Aditya Basrur (he has enjoyed both
> Kal Ho Na Ho and Chalte Chalte). OTOH Amitabh Bachchan
> after decades of blockbusters tends to give average
> hits. Shah Rukh Khan fans conclude Shah Rukh Khan >>>>
> Amitabh Bachchan
>
> Rahul Dravid has been scoring big time ever since WI
> 2002. He has been scoring big 100s, making merry given
> the easy bowling he faced in Aus (no Mcgrath, Warne),
> in Pak (Shoaib/Sami completely demoralized by Sehwag
> and lesser extent by SRT in T1) and boosting his
> records. OTOH SRT after more than a decade of playing
> many splendid knocks against many awesome attacks has
> been facing a few hiccups. And RD fans conclude Rahul
> Dravid >>>>> Sachin Tendulkar.
You are ignoring one impoortant fact. Rahul Dravid has been scoring
runs, plenty of them. Give it to him. So are the others. Laxman, Sehwag,
Ganuly, Tendulkar, Yuvraj, even Parthiv have been scoring runs. Plenty
of 'em. Give it to them also. But Shah Rukh Khan has been giving
super-duper-bumper hits when no one else in the industry is able to
assure even an average grosser. There is that bit of difference between
RD and SRK fans. The RD fans are gloating over an also ran, the SRK fans
are gloating over a genuine performer. The SRK>=AB scenario is not too
bad given that context, certainly not as bad as you make it sound
(equating it to RD>SRT discussion).
RP Sharma
<snip>