Rahul Dravid and Shah Rukh Khan

Rahul Dravid and Shah Rukh Khan

Post by Ram Prasad Sharm » Sun, 09 May 2004 00:16:40



 > Shah Rukh Khan has given a lot of hits in the past few
 > years, especially the last 2-3 has been giving many
 > blockbusters. But mostly stupid films enjoyed by
 > stupid folks like Aditya Basrur (he has enjoyed both
 > Kal Ho Na Ho and Chalte Chalte). OTOH Amitabh Bachchan
 > after decades of blockbusters tends to give average
 > hits. Shah Rukh Khan fans conclude Shah Rukh Khan >>>>
 > Amitabh Bachchan
 >
 > Rahul Dravid has been scoring big time ever since WI
 > 2002. He has been scoring big 100s, making merry given
 > the easy bowling he faced in Aus (no Mcgrath, Warne),
 > in Pak (Shoaib/Sami completely demoralized by Sehwag
 > and lesser extent by SRT in T1) and boosting his
 > records. OTOH SRT after more than a decade of playing
 > many splendid knocks against many awesome attacks has
 > been facing a few hiccups. And RD fans conclude Rahul
 > Dravid >>>>> Sachin Tendulkar.

You are ignoring one impoortant fact. Rahul Dravid has been scoring
runs, plenty of them. Give it to him. So are the others. Laxman, Sehwag,
Ganuly, Tendulkar, Yuvraj, even Parthiv have been scoring runs. Plenty
of 'em. Give it to them also. But Shah Rukh Khan has been giving
super-duper-bumper hits when no one else in the industry is able to
assure even an average grosser. There is that bit of difference between
RD and SRK fans. The RD fans are gloating over an also ran, the SRK fans
are gloating over a genuine performer. The SRK>=AB scenario is not too
bad given that context, certainly not as bad as you make it sound
(equating it to RD>SRT discussion).

RP Sharma

<snip>

 
 
 

Rahul Dravid and Shah Rukh Khan

Post by Shekhar Prasad Sharm » Mon, 10 May 2004 14:26:19

OT BS



Quote:
> You are ignoring one impoortant fact. Rahul Dravid has been scoring
> runs, plenty of them. Give it to him. So are the others. Laxman, Sehwag,
> Ganuly, Tendulkar, Yuvraj, even Parthiv have been scoring runs. Plenty
> of 'em. Give it to them also. But Shah Rukh Khan has been giving
> super-duper-bumper hits when no one else in the industry is able to
> assure even an average grosser. There is that bit of difference between
> RD and SRK fans. The RD fans are gloating over an also ran, the SRK fans
> are gloating over a genuine performer. The SRK>=AB scenario is not too
> bad given that context, certainly not as bad as you make it sound
> (equating it to RD>SRT discussion).

> RP Sharma

Hai Ram,

Thanks for your thoughts. I enjoyed your performance in Darjeeling earlier this
afternoon. For obvious reasons, I couldn't see you crying at the beginning of
the show - but it was really unrealistic. I mean, did you have a *** in
your lower lip? Can't you at least show some emotion when your father is unwell?

Anyway, I think you're best sticking to singing songs for Sushmita Sen. Your
Cricket knowledge is as good as your taste in films. (Did you know Tendulkar
hasn't yet scored 1000 runs in wins away from home?)

And good job you didn't try going for Amrita Rao in the film - she's waaay out
of your league. What a smile ... what moves ... she reminds me of a slimmer Rani
when she dances. You're better off sticking to a washed up slapper like Miss
Chandni, with her big nostrils, hirsute face and male eyes. She's a nice girl,
though - fills her tops very well.

Shankar Prasad [Tera Baap] Sharma

P.S. It should be obvious who's posting this - I don't need to anonymise fully
by going onto servers where you can't see my IP address. It wasn't a bad film,
but hardly particularly good..