by sdavmo » Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:09:13
England currently has 118 pts, RSA 117.
If England loses 1 game to SL how does it effect the ranking? If it
loses 2 does that put RSA into #1 spot?
--
SDM a 21st century schizoid man in SoCal
Systems Theory website www.systemstheory.net
"overfulnoisecascade" CD coming soon
by idjenni.. » Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:15:23
> England currently has 118 pts, RSA 117.
> If England loses 1 game to SL how does it effect the ranking? If it
> loses 2 does that put RSA into #1 spot?
> --
> SDM a 21st century schizoid man in SoCal
> Systems Theory website www.systemstheory.net
> "overfulnoisecascade" CD coming soon
Ian
by Andrew Dunfor » Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:27:56
>> England currently has 118 pts, RSA 117.
>> If England loses 1 game to SL how does it effect the ranking? If it
>> loses 2 does that put RSA into #1 spot?
>> --
>> SDM a 21st century schizoid man in SoCal
>> Systems Theory website www.systemstheory.net
>> "overfulnoisecascade" CD coming soon
> I thought I heard Tony Greig saying, this morning, at the Lanka game, that
> a 0-2 defeat for England would see SA into top spot, but not a 0-1 defeat.
> Was just walking into the kitchen at the time, though, so may have
> misheard.
It's a fairly annoying piece of software but as far as I can tell even a 1-0
defeat would drop England to 114 points, two below South Africa's current
total.
Andrew
by Howzza » Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:19:27
> > England currently has 118 pts, RSA 117.
> > If England loses 1 game to SL how does it effect the ranking? ?If it
> > loses 2 does that put RSA into #1 spot?
> > --
> > SDM a 21st century schizoid man in SoCal
> > Systems Theory websitewww.systemstheory.net
> > "overfulnoisecascade" CD coming soon
> I thought I heard Tony Greig saying, this morning, at the Lanka game, that a 0-2 defeat for England would see SA into top spot, but not a 0-1 defeat. Was just walking into the kitchen at the time, though, so may have misheard.
> Ian
by sdavmo » Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:03:04
>>> <http://SportToday.org/;
>>> England currently has 118 pts, RSA 117.
>>> If England loses 1 game to SL how does it effect the ranking? If it
>>> loses 2 does that put RSA into #1 spot?
>>> --
>>> SDM a 21st century schizoid man in SoCal
>>> Systems Theory website www.systemstheory.net
>>> "overfulnoisecascade" CD coming soon
>> I thought I heard Tony Greig saying, this morning, at the Lanka game,
>> that a 0-2 defeat for England would see SA into top spot, but not a
>> 0-1 defeat. Was just walking into the kitchen at the time, though, so
>> may have misheard.
> http://SportToday.org/
> It's a fairly annoying piece of software but as far as I can tell even a
> 1-0 defeat would drop England to 114 points, two below South Africa's
> current total.
> Andrew
by Andrew Dunfor » Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:19:52
>>>> <http://SportToday.org/;
>>>> England currently has 118 pts, RSA 117.
>>>> If England loses 1 game to SL how does it effect the ranking? If it
>>>> loses 2 does that put RSA into #1 spot?
>>>> --
>>>> SDM a 21st century schizoid man in SoCal
>>>> Systems Theory website www.systemstheory.net
>>>> "overfulnoisecascade" CD coming soon
>>> I thought I heard Tony Greig saying, this morning, at the Lanka game,
>>> that a 0-2 defeat for England would see SA into top spot, but not a
>>> 0-1 defeat. Was just walking into the kitchen at the time, though, so
>>> may have misheard.
>> http://SportToday.org/
>> It's a fairly annoying piece of software but as far as I can tell even a
>> 1-0 defeat would drop England to 114 points, two below South Africa's
>> current total.
>> Andrew
> Okay. I tried the software. It looks like 1-0 SL ties RSA and Eng. But
> England has Windies before saffers at home so if Eng can not *** up
> against SL (holding breath) and deal properly with Windies maybe that 1
> vs 2 series will have something worth fighting about.
South Africa now has 116 at the conclusion of the series with NZ.
For SL-Eng:
0-0 drops Eng to 116
1-0 SL drops Eng to 114
2-0 SL drops Eng to 113
1-1 drops Eng to 116
1-0 Eng raises Eng to 119
2-0 Eng raises Eng to 120
Andrew
by Vijay Sharm » Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:43:45
> >>> <http://SportToday.org/;
> >>> England currently has 118 pts, RSA 117.
> >>> If England loses 1 game to SL how does it effect the ranking? If it
> >>> loses 2 does that put RSA into #1 spot?
> >>> --
> >>> SDM a 21st century schizoid man in SoCal
> >>> Systems Theory website www.systemstheory.net
> >>> "overfulnoisecascade" CD coming soon
> >> I thought I heard Tony Greig saying, this morning, at the Lanka game,
> >> that a 0-2 defeat for England would see SA into top spot, but not a
> >> 0-1 defeat. Was just walking into the kitchen at the time, though, so
> >> may have misheard.
> > http://SportToday.org/
> > It's a fairly annoying piece of software but as far as I can tell even a
> > 1-0 defeat would drop England to 114 points, two below South Africa's
> > current total.
> > Andrew
> Okay. I tried the software. It looks like 1-0 SL ties RSA and Eng. But
> England has Windies before saffers at home so if Eng can not *** up
> against SL (holding breath) and deal properly with Windies maybe that 1
> vs 2 series will have something worth fighting about.
Looks like SL have this Test wrapped up...they have already earned a 125 run lead.
It'd be interesting to see how many teams have had less than 120 points and yet have been ranked number 1. When was the last time it happened?
by sdavmo » Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:39:22
>>>>> <http://SportToday.org/;
>>>>> England currently has 118 pts, RSA 117.
>>>>> If England loses 1 game to SL how does it effect the ranking? If it
>>>>> loses 2 does that put RSA into #1 spot?
>>>>> --
>>>>> SDM a 21st century schizoid man in SoCal
>>>>> Systems Theory website www.systemstheory.net
>>>>> "overfulnoisecascade" CD coming soon
>>>> I thought I heard Tony Greig saying, this morning, at the Lanka game,
>>>> that a 0-2 defeat for England would see SA into top spot, but not a
>>>> 0-1 defeat. Was just walking into the kitchen at the time, though, so
>>>> may have misheard.
>>> http://SportToday.org/
>>> It's a fairly annoying piece of software but as far as I can tell even a
>>> 1-0 defeat would drop England to 114 points, two below South Africa's
>>> current total.
>>> Andrew
>> Okay. I tried the software. It looks like 1-0 SL ties RSA and Eng. But
>> England has Windies before saffers at home so if Eng can not *** up
>> against SL (holding breath) and deal properly with Windies maybe that 1
>> vs 2 series will have something worth fighting about.
> That's not what I got.
> South Africa now has 116 at the conclusion of the series with NZ.
> For SL-Eng:
> 0-0 drops Eng to 116
> 1-0 SL drops Eng to 114
> 2-0 SL drops Eng to 113
> 1-1 drops Eng to 116
> 1-0 Eng raises Eng to 119
> 2-0 Eng raises Eng to 120
> Andrew
by arahi » Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:21:00
> >>>>> <http://SportToday.org/;
> >>>>> England currently has 118 pts, RSA 117.
> >>>>> If England loses 1 game to SL how does it effect the ranking? If it
> >>>>> loses 2 does that put RSA into #1 spot?
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> SDM a 21st century schizoid man in SoCal
> >>>>> Systems Theory websitewww.systemstheory.net
> >>>>> "overfulnoisecascade" CD coming soon
> >>>> I thought I heard Tony Greig saying, this morning, at the Lanka game,
> >>>> that a 0-2 defeat for England would see SA into top spot, but not a
> >>>> 0-1 defeat. Was just walking into the kitchen at the time, though, so
> >>>> may have misheard.
> >>>http://SportToday.org/
> >>> It's a fairly annoying piece of software but as far as I can tell even a
> >>> 1-0 defeat would drop England to 114 points, two below South Africa's
> >>> current total.
> >>> Andrew
> >> Okay. I tried the software. It looks like 1-0 SL ties RSA and Eng. But
> >> England has Windies before saffers at home so if Eng can not *** up
> >> against SL (holding breath) and deal properly with Windies maybe that 1
> >> vs 2 series will have something worth fighting about.
> > That's not what I got.
> > South Africa now has 116 at the conclusion of the series with NZ.
> > For SL-Eng:
> > 0-0 drops Eng to 116
> > 1-0 SL drops Eng to 114
> > 2-0 SL drops Eng to 113
> > 1-1 drops Eng to 116
> > 1-0 Eng raises Eng to 119
> > 2-0 Eng raises Eng to 120
> > Andrew
> Thanks, Andrew.
> --
> - Show quoted text -
by noma » Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:07:29
>>> South Africa now has 116 at the conclusion of the series with NZ.
>>> For SL-Eng:
>>> 0-0 drops Eng to 116
>>> 1-0 SL drops Eng to 114
>>> 2-0 SL drops Eng to 113
>>> 1-1 drops Eng to 116
>>> 1-0 Eng raises Eng to 119
>>> 2-0 Eng raises Eng to 120
>>> Andrew
>> Thanks, Andrew.
>> --
> And in August or there abouts the rankings will get a bit scrambled as
> a year's worth of results get dropped and another year's are halved.
By the way, a 1-1 Eng-SL result will have both England and RSA at 116
points. However, England will still keep the top spot due to a half
point lead. South Africa is currently at 115.9, whereas England will end
up with 116.4.
--
Noman
2. Serious question regarding Muralitharan's testing
3. India move up the ICC test rankings
4. ICC Test Cricket Player rankings...Brian Lara
6. ICC test rankings are BRIILIANT!
8. Three Indian bowlers in the top ten in the official ICC test rankings
10. India is now second in the ICC Test rankings, replacing England
11. ICC Media release regarding Murali report
12. Question regarding Indian cricket team
13. Some Questions regarding Pak cricket
14. Two "rules of cricket" questions regarding helmets