by alve » Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:01:34
--------------------------
LdS: Coming from Qld of course you would be very well versed in how to
act in this despicable manner in your daily life. You are the racist
pits dude.
What a crack up this QLD bigot is!!
AS: Well done Bozo! Now let's have some proof of my bigotry & racism.
Quick smart hey.
-------------------------------------
Provide proof or apologise.
alvey
by Larry de Silv » Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:52:32
> --------------------------
> LdS: Coming from Qld of course you would be very well versed in how to
> act in this despicable manner in your daily life. You are the racist
> pits dude.
> What a crack up this QLD bigot is!!
> AS: Well done Bozo! Now let's have some proof of my bigotry & racism.
> Quick smart hey.
> -------------------------------------
Also, tell us why you never answer Bob Dubery's questions asked of you?
Waiting, waiting....................
Laz
by alve » Thu, 23 Dec 2004 19:41:29
>>I posted the below at 10:34, 22/12/04.
>>--------------------------
>>LdS: Coming from Qld of course you would be very well versed in how to
>>act in this despicable manner in your daily life. You are the racist
>>pits dude.
>>What a crack up this QLD bigot is!!
>>AS: Well done Bozo! Now let's have some proof of my bigotry & racism.
>>Quick smart hey.
>>-------------------------------------
> Only after YOU answer MY question as to why you thought that I was a liar
> for changing my mind about posting to a
> thread I said I was done with, yet YOU did exactly the same thing? You have
> NEVER answered this question that has been asked of you many times. Does
> that mean that YOU are a liar too according to your own definition Alvey?
> Also, tell us why you never answer Bob Dubery's questions asked of you?
> Waiting, waiting....................
Provide proof or apologise.
alvey
by Larry de Silv » Thu, 23 Dec 2004 19:55:08
> >>I posted the below at 10:34, 22/12/04.
> >>--------------------------
> >>LdS: Coming from Qld of course you would be very well versed in how to
> >>act in this despicable manner in your daily life. You are the racist
> >>pits dude.
> >>What a crack up this QLD bigot is!!
> >>AS: Well done Bozo! Now let's have some proof of my bigotry & racism.
> >>Quick smart hey.
> >>-------------------------------------
> > Only after YOU answer MY question as to why you thought that I was a
liar
> > for changing my mind about posting to a
> > thread I said I was done with, yet YOU did exactly the same thing? You
have
> > NEVER answered this question that has been asked of you many times. Does
> > that mean that YOU are a liar too according to your own definition
Alvey?
> > Also, tell us why you never answer Bob Dubery's questions asked of you?
> > Waiting, waiting....................
> You can wait all you like Bozo but it'd be a far better idea if you
> spent your time looking for something to support your libel.
> Provide proof or apologise.
Laz
> alvey
by alve » Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:10:40
>>>>I posted the below at 10:34, 22/12/04.
>>>>--------------------------
>>>>LdS: Coming from Qld of course you would be very well versed in how to
>>>>act in this despicable manner in your daily life. You are the racist
>>>>pits dude.
>>>>What a crack up this QLD bigot is!!
>>>>AS: Well done Bozo! Now let's have some proof of my bigotry & racism.
>>>>Quick smart hey.
>>>>-------------------------------------
>>>Only after YOU answer MY question as to why you thought that I was a
> liar
>>>for changing my mind about posting to a
>>>thread I said I was done with, yet YOU did exactly the same thing? You
> have
>>>NEVER answered this question that has been asked of you many times. Does
>>>that mean that YOU are a liar too according to your own definition
> Alvey?
>>>Also, tell us why you never answer Bob Dubery's questions asked of you?
>>>Waiting, waiting....................
>>You can wait all you like Bozo but it'd be a far better idea if you
>>spent your time looking for something to support your libel.
>>Provide proof or apologise.
> Since this is the season of peace, love and goodwill, I'll
> apologise......................
by Bob Duber » Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:27:48
> >>Provide proof or apologise.
> > Since this is the season of peace, love and goodwill, I'll
> > apologise......................
> Just checking. You are apologising for calling me a racist because
you
> were mistaken. This is correct?
It rather looks like Larry can't come up with (a) so he's given you
(b). You didn't originally ask him to state that you are not a racist,
only to apologise or to prove the accusation. So "I apologise for
saying that you're a racist as I can't find any utterings by you on
usenet that support that accusation" should meet your criteria.
by alve » Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:53:56
>>>>Provide proof or apologise.
>>>Since this is the season of peace, love and goodwill, I'll
>>>apologise......................
>>Just checking. You are apologising for calling me a racist because
> you
>>were mistaken. This is correct?
> The choices you gave Larry were
> a) Provide proof
> b) Apologise
> It rather looks like Larry can't come up with (a) so he's given you
> (b). You didn't originally ask him to state that you are not a racist,
> only to apologise or to prove the accusation. So "I apologise for
> saying that you're a racist as I can't find any utterings by you on
> usenet that support that accusation" should meet your criteria.
by Bob Duber » Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:14:38
I also don't for one minute believe that you want an apology. I believe
that you want Larry to grovel - which is not the same thing. But then I
also believe that you're too obsessed with the flamewar that you're
caught up in to take the opportunity to look gracious and generous when
it's presented to you. Which, in my book, makes you the bozo.
And don't bother asking for apologies for anything here that's got your
pee in a froth. You don't want apologies. When I gave you the chance
you spat it right back in my face. You'll deny that on usenet, but you
know and I know the truth of the matter and that's plenty good enough
for me.
by alve » Fri, 24 Dec 2004 04:34:35
>>There's apologies and then there's apologies and this one smells like
>>something from a politician.
> I'm sure you know all about speaking with a forked tongue.
>>I may not have been lawyer-like specific by using rsc shorthand, but
> I
>>want an apology stating that he's apologising because he's wrong and
> not
>>because of some "Since this is the season of peace, love and
>>goodwill..." shit.
> Well what Larry says is up to him. For myself I know that you expect
> everybody you differ with to be absolutely pin-point perfect in every
> regard and you take them absolutely literally when it suits you. So I
> would expect you to either start cutting people some slack or to match
> the standard of perfection that you think you have the right to demand
> from others. I doubt that you'll do either.
> I also don't for one minute believe that you want an apology. I believe
> that you want Larry to grovel - which is not the same thing. But then I
> also believe that you're too obsessed with the flamewar that you're
> caught up in to take the opportunity to look gracious and generous when
> it's presented to you. Which, in my book, makes you the bozo.
> And don't bother asking for apologies for anything here that's got your
> pee in a froth. You don't want apologies. When I gave you the chance
> you spat it right back in my face. You'll deny that on usenet, but you
> know and I know the truth of the matter and that's plenty good enough
> for me.
And a tremendous lecture Dubery. Right down there with your very best.
It's perfectly simple O Queen of the Personal Pronoun.
Bozo libelled me.
I asked for an apology or proof.
The "apology" he made was unsatisfactory as he clearly inferred that it
was being made for a reason other than his error.
Now why don't you trundle off to a nice quite room, put on your best
innocent & puzzled frown, and ask yourself why you keep defending this
overgrown gutter-snipe.
by kenhig.. » Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:20:32
> > There's apologies and then there's apologies and this one smells
like
> > something from a politician.
> I'm sure you know all about speaking with a forked tongue.
> > I may not have been lawyer-like specific by using rsc shorthand,
but
> I
> > want an apology stating that he's apologising because he's wrong
and
> not
> > because of some "Since this is the season of peace, love and
> > goodwill..." shit.
> Well what Larry says is up to him. For myself I know that you expect
> everybody you differ with to be absolutely pin-point perfect in every
> regard and you take them absolutely literally when it suits you. So I
> would expect you to either start cutting people some slack or to
match
> the standard of perfection that you think you have the right to
demand
> from others. I doubt that you'll do either.
> I also don't for one minute believe that you want an apology. I
believe
> that you want Larry to grovel - which is not the same thing. But then
I
> also believe that you're too obsessed with the flamewar that you're
> caught up in to take the opportunity to look gracious and generous
when
> it's presented to you. Which, in my book, makes you the bozo.
> And don't bother asking for apologies for anything here that's got
your
> pee in a froth. You don't want apologies. When I gave you the chance
> you spat it right back in my face. You'll deny that on usenet, but
you
> know and I know the truth of the matter and that's plenty good enough
> for me.
I nominate Alvey for All-Time *** of RSC.
Oh, and a further Xmas request, let's all try to tone down the flames
on rsc, and the easiest way for EVERYONE to do that would be to
killfile this snivelling arsehole once and for all.
Given his propensity to use a killfile to avoid ever having to answer
for his lies and misrepresentations, it seems to me to be the most
appropriate reward available.
Oh, and whilst I've never used a killfile, if someone wants to start
the ball rolling, I'll be happy to break the rule of a lifetime.
H
by kenhig.. » Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:04:47
> > There's apologies and then there's apologies and this one smells
like
> > something from a politician.
> I'm sure you know all about speaking with a forked tongue.
> > I may not have been lawyer-like specific by using rsc shorthand,
but
> I
> > want an apology stating that he's apologising because he's wrong
and
> not
> > because of some "Since this is the season of peace, love and
> > goodwill..." shit.
> Well what Larry says is up to him. For myself I know that you expect
> everybody you differ with to be absolutely pin-point perfect in every
> regard and you take them absolutely literally when it suits you. So I
> would expect you to either start cutting people some slack or to
match
> the standard of perfection that you think you have the right to
demand
> from others. I doubt that you'll do either.
> I also don't for one minute believe that you want an apology. I
believe
> that you want Larry to grovel - which is not the same thing. But then
I
> also believe that you're too obsessed with the flamewar that you're
> caught up in to take the opportunity to look gracious and generous
when
> it's presented to you. Which, in my book, makes you the bozo.
> And don't bother asking for apologies for anything here that's got
your
> pee in a froth. You don't want apologies. When I gave you the chance
> you spat it right back in my face. You'll deny that on usenet, but
you
> know and I know the truth of the matter and that's plenty good enough
> for me.
I nominate Alvey for All-Time *** of RSC.
Oh, and a further Xmas request, let's all try to tone down the flames
on rsc, and the easiest way for EVERYONE to do that would be to
killfile this snivelling arsehole once and for all.
Given his propensity to use a killfile to avoid ever having to answer
for his lies and misrepresentations, it seems to me to be the most
appropriate reward available.
Oh, and whilst I've never used a killfile, if someone wants to start
the ball rolling, I'll be happy to break the rule of a lifetime.
H
by Bob Duber » Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:44:54
> >>There's apologies and then there's apologies and this one smells
like
> >>something from a politician.
> > I'm sure you know all about speaking with a forked tongue.
> >>I may not have been lawyer-like specific by using rsc shorthand,
but
> > I
> >>want an apology stating that he's apologising because he's wrong
and
> > not
> >>because of some "Since this is the season of peace, love and
> >>goodwill..." shit.
> > Well what Larry says is up to him. For myself I know that you
expect
> > everybody you differ with to be absolutely pin-point perfect in
every
> > regard and you take them absolutely literally when it suits you. So
I
> > would expect you to either start cutting people some slack or to
match
> > the standard of perfection that you think you have the right to
demand
> > from others. I doubt that you'll do either.
> > I also don't for one minute believe that you want an apology. I
believe
> > that you want Larry to grovel - which is not the same thing. But
then I
> > also believe that you're too obsessed with the flamewar that you're
> > caught up in to take the opportunity to look gracious and generous
when
> > it's presented to you. Which, in my book, makes you the bozo.
> > And don't bother asking for apologies for anything here that's got
your
> > pee in a froth. You don't want apologies. When I gave you the
chance
> > you spat it right back in my face. You'll deny that on usenet, but
you
> > know and I know the truth of the matter and that's plenty good
enough
> > for me.
> lol. Thank Clang you're not an historian.
> And a tremendous lecture Dubery. Right down there with your very
best.
> It's perfectly simple O Queen of the Personal Pronoun.
Even more to the point - are you bigot enough to think that
***ity is actually a brush that people can be tarred with,
something that people should be ashamed of, something that is
undesirable or inferior?
So two options. Read them carefully.
1) Say sorry to the gay folk of the world for suggesting that they need
to be ashamed or are inferior or otherwise undesirable on the basis of
their *** orientation.
2) Give me a big, wet kiss with lots of tongue in it. After all, it's
Christmas and we can put our differences aside and be nice and chummy.
The real problem is not that anybody libelled you. The problems here
are
1) You've talked yourself into a position from which you cannot climb
down without losing face (Larry's done the same, and in both cases it's
your own problem and I wish you both luck in solving it)
2) You're just a snivelling little wuss who can't take his own
medicine.
> Now why don't you trundle off to a nice quite room, put on your best
> innocent & puzzled frown, and ask yourself why you keep defending
this
> overgrown gutter-snipe.
Here's the URL for the place that you've made where there's no Larry,
no Ken and you control what gets said.
http://SportToday.org/
Why don't you***of there? The moderator's a bit cranky and prone to
making up the rules as he goes along, but look on the bright side:
Nobody you don't like is allowed.
by alve » Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:03:26
>>It's perfectly simple O Queen of the Personal Pronoun.
> "Queen"? Are you tarring me with the brush of ***ity?
> Even more to the point - are you bigot enough to think that
> ***ity is actually a brush that people can be tarred with,
> something that people should be ashamed of, something that is
> undesirable or inferior?
> So two options. Read them carefully.
> 2) Give me a big, wet kiss with lots of tongue in it. After all, it's
> Christmas and we can put our differences aside and be nice and chummy.
>>Bozo libelled me.
> Oh grow up! You've called people liars, ***ups, plagiarists ...
> there's an endless list of libel and slander from you.
Yes, I have called people liars, ***ups & plagiarists. Now two of those
three are provable and one isn't and the difference between me & Bozo is
that when I call someone a liar or a plagiarist it's proveable. I can't
understand why this is so difficult for you to comprehend.
> The real problem is not that anybody libelled you. The problems here
> are
> 1) You've talked yourself into a position from which you cannot climb
> down without losing face
(Larry's done the same, and in both cases it's
>>I asked for an apology or proof.
>>The "apology" he made was unsatisfactory as he clearly inferred that
>> it was being made for a reason other than his error.
> Crap. You asked him to show proof or apologise. He couldn't do one so
> he did the other. The validity of his accusation was not actually made
> an issue.
>>Now why don't you trundle off to a nice quite room, put on your best
>>innocent & puzzled frown, and ask yourself why you keep defending
>> this overgrown gutter-snipe.
> Ooooh.... correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that libel? You should
> know. You're the expert on the matter.
> Here's the URL for the place that you've made where there's no Larry,
> no Ken and you control what gets said.
> http://SportToday.org/
> Why don't you***of there?
Oh btw Chuckles, you've expended quite alot of methane here wildly
firing blanks and knocking up shanties, but I didn't actually see
anything on why you persist on defending Indefensible of Bendigo.
C'monnn. Don't be shy.
I'm keen to hear a reprise of your last performance. Especially
the "Larry's not the worst on this ng" aria. That was spine-tingling.
1. For tonight at last ( THE ASHES) are coming home, are coming home!
2. The convicts are coming ! The convicts are coming !
4. BOZO BHOGLE ADMITS TO SPOT FIXING BUT NOT MATCH FIXING
6. Has this bozo finally been sectioned?
8. Comes to play a decisive role again ... Rain
11. RSC.poetry [the second coming]
12. Is the Indian team coming to Sydney ??????
13. Aamir Sohail hits century: India Comes a Cropper Again (old)
14. some goodies from rathore, azhar comes and goes