the story in the smh seems to suggest that ponting's antics had
something to do with benson abandoning the match:
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/video-review-claims-its-first-sca...
note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
by subi.. » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:56:40
note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
by dechuck » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:28:32
> note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
Not sure that Ponting can be blamed for this one when Benson has a history
of illness during Test matches and every man and his dog seems unhappy with
how the UDRS is working or maybe not working is the better comment.
by subi.. » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:48:36
> > the story in the smh seems to suggest that ponting's antics had
> > something to do with benson abandoning the match:
> >http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/video-review-claims-its-first-sca...
> > note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
> Seems more that he has problems with the UDRS and was much more unhappy with
> the Chanderpaul incident when he was given out.
> Not sure that Ponting can be blamed for this one when Benson has a history
> of illness during Test matches and every man and his dog seems unhappy with
> how the UDRS is working or maybe not working is the better comment.
so i am not holding ponting wholly responsible. my question is, at
what point does "strenously queried" becomes dissent?
by dechuck » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:59:48
> > the story in the smh seems to suggest that ponting's antics had
> > something to do with benson abandoning the match:
> >http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/video-review-claims-its-first-sca...
> > note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
> Seems more that he has problems with the UDRS and was much more unhappy
> with
> the Chanderpaul incident when he was given out.
> Not sure that Ponting can be blamed for this one when Benson has a history
> of illness during Test matches and every man and his dog seems unhappy
> with
> how the UDRS is working or maybe not working is the better comment.
so i am not holding ponting wholly responsible. my question is, at
what point does "strenously queried" becomes dissent?
=================================================
When the match referee calls it dissent I assume.
by subi.. » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:12:20
> > > the story in the smh seems to suggest that ponting's antics had
> > > something to do with benson abandoning the match:
> > >http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/video-review-claims-its-first-sca...
> > > note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
> > Seems more that he has problems with the UDRS and was much more unhappy
> > with
> > the Chanderpaul incident when he was given out.
> > Not sure that Ponting can be blamed for this one when Benson has a history
> > of illness during Test matches and every man and his dog seems unhappy
> > with
> > how the UDRS is working or maybe not working is the better comment.
> yes, benson has not been well, but ?he decided the fly out in the
> middle of a match, as the article has it, "following a stressful first
> day in the Adelaide Test, during which one of his decisions was
> overruled by the TV umpire and another was strenuously queried by
> Australian captain Ricky Ponting."
> so i am not holding ponting wholly responsible. my question is, at
> what point does "strenously queried" becomes dissent?
> =================================================
> When the match referee calls it dissent I assume.
by subi.. » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:46:05
> > > > the story in the smh seems to suggest that ponting's antics had
> > > > something to do with benson abandoning the match:
> > > >http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/video-review-claims-its-first-sca...
> > > > note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
> > > Seems more that he has problems with the UDRS and was much more unhappy
> > > with
> > > the Chanderpaul incident when he was given out.
> > > Not sure that Ponting can be blamed for this one when Benson has a history
> > > of illness during Test matches and every man and his dog seems unhappy
> > > with
> > > how the UDRS is working or maybe not working is the better comment.
> > yes, benson has not been well, but ?he decided the fly out in the
> > middle of a match, as the article has it, "following a stressful first
> > day in the Adelaide Test, during which one of his decisions was
> > overruled by the TV umpire and another was strenuously queried by
> > Australian captain Ricky Ponting."
> > so i am not holding ponting wholly responsible. my question is, at
> > what point does "strenously queried" becomes dissent?
> > =================================================
> > When the match referee calls it dissent I assume.
> good to watch ponting mouthing off after wasting his first referral.
> but nice guys don't dissent. or nice guys don't pull up other nice
> guys for dissent.
by dechuck » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:56:34
> > > the story in the smh seems to suggest that ponting's antics had
> > > something to do with benson abandoning the match:
> > >http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/video-review-claims-its-first-sca...
> > > note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
> > Seems more that he has problems with the UDRS and was much more unhappy
> > with
> > the Chanderpaul incident when he was given out.
> > Not sure that Ponting can be blamed for this one when Benson has a
> > history
> > of illness during Test matches and every man and his dog seems unhappy
> > with
> > how the UDRS is working or maybe not working is the better comment.
> yes, benson has not been well, but he decided the fly out in the
> middle of a match, as the article has it, "following a stressful first
> day in the Adelaide Test, during which one of his decisions was
> overruled by the TV umpire and another was strenuously queried by
> Australian captain Ricky Ponting."
> so i am not holding ponting wholly responsible. my question is, at
> what point does "strenously queried" becomes dissent?
> =================================================
> When the match referee calls it dissent I assume.
==================================================
That is true you just have to look at Pontings history with CoC to see he
has never been charged with dissent
http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/breaches-and-penalties.php
smo :-)
by jzfredrick » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:57:32
by CDK » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:17:39
> note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
CDK
by dechuck » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:23:17
>> note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
> Dissent has been legalised by the ICC.
by CDK » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:28:03
>>> the story in the smh seems to suggest that ponting's antics had
>>> something to do with benson abandoning the match:
>>> http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/video-review-claims-its-first-sca...
>>> note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
>> Dissent has been legalised by the ICC.
> no that's chucking, dissent has only been legalised for non
> sub-continent members of the ICC :-)
CDK
by dechuck » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:37:23
>>>> the story in the smh seems to suggest that ponting's antics had
>>>> something to do with benson abandoning the match:
>>>> http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/video-review-claims-its-first-sca...
>>>> note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
>>> Dissent has been legalised by the ICC.
>> no that's chucking, dissent has only been legalised for non sub-continent
>> members of the ICC :-)
> Yet the Test inlcuding the sub contintal teams didn't include the
> legalised dissent.
by subi.. » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:32:03
> > note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
> Dissent has been legalised by the ICC.
> CDK
by subi.. » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:38:09
> > > > the story in the smh seems to suggest that ponting's antics had
> > > > something to do with benson abandoning the match:
> > > >http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/video-review-claims-its-first-sca...
> > > > note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
> > > Seems more that he has problems with the UDRS and was much more unhappy
> > > with
> > > the Chanderpaul incident when he was given out.
> > > Not sure that Ponting can be blamed for this one when Benson has a
> > > history
> > > of illness during Test matches and every man and his dog seems unhappy
> > > with
> > > how the UDRS is working or maybe not working is the better comment.
> > yes, benson has not been well, but he decided the fly out in the
> > middle of a match, as the article has it, "following a stressful first
> > day in the Adelaide Test, during which one of his decisions was
> > overruled by the TV umpire and another was strenuously queried by
> > Australian captain Ricky Ponting."
> > so i am not holding ponting wholly responsible. my question is, at
> > what point does "strenously queried" becomes dissent?
> > =================================================
> > When the match referee calls it dissent I assume.
> good to watch ponting mouthing off after wasting his first referral.
> but nice guys don't dissent. or nice guys don't pull up other nice
> guys for dissent.
> ==================================================
> That is true you just have to look at Pontings history with CoC to see he
> has never been charged with dissent
> http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/breaches-and-penalties.php
> smo :-)
by subi.. » Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:43:30
> >>> the story in the smh seems to suggest that ponting's antics had
> >>> something to do with benson abandoning the match:
> >>>http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/video-review-claims-its-first-sca...
> >>> note chris broad's bizarre ambivalence.
> >> Dissent has been legalised by the ICC.
> > no that's chucking, dissent has only been legalised for non
> > sub-continent members of the ICC ?:-)
> Yet the Test inlcuding the sub contintal teams didn't include the
> legalised dissent.
> CDK
"The left-arm quick was later responsible for a melodramatic moment
when an emphatic lbw shout against Nash was refused. Nash didn't offer
a shot to an in-dipper which appeared destined for the stumps but was
given not out, prompting Bollinger to theatrically kick the turf in
anger."
1. Martyn/Ponting: old or grown ups?
2. Cricket-Ponting apologises for dissent against umpire
3. What CoC level was Ponting dissent
5. why oh why tendulkar...why oh why
6. London newspaper solves mystery of India's reluctance to use DRS
7. Despite reluctance, Muralitharan may tour Australia
8. Dravid's reluctance on getting out on 0
9. Why's Ponting not bowling Gillespie at tail?
10. Why Tendulkar is better than Ponting
11. Ponting and his Kookaburra bat why was it illegal
12. Why wasn't Dhoni fined when Ponting was tampering the ball?