Inzamam Ul Haq???

Inzamam Ul Haq???

Post by Bean » Thu, 27 Feb 2003 06:33:55


He used to be one of the greatest batsmen to watch but he is having a
terrible World Cup, in the last 4 matches he has only scored 10 runs,
what do you think is wrong with him? he lost a lot of weight which
could possibly be a reason, maybe he's just having a bad patch or
maybe he's washed up.  What do ya think?
 
 
 

Inzamam Ul Haq???

Post by Terence McCarth » Thu, 27 Feb 2003 06:55:57

I think you should sort out your own problems before worrying about Inzamam.


Quote:
> He used to be one of the greatest batsmen to watch but he is having a
> terrible World Cup, in the last 4 matches he has only scored 10 runs,
> what do you think is wrong with him? he lost a lot of weight which
> could possibly be a reason, maybe he's just having a bad patch or
> maybe he's washed up.  What do ya think?


 
 
 

Inzamam Ul Haq???

Post by The Wo » Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:14:11


Quote:
> He used to be one of the greatest batsmen to watch but he is having a
> terrible World Cup, in the last 4 matches he has only scored 10 runs,
> what do you think is wrong with him? he lost a lot of weight which
> could possibly be a reason, maybe he's just having a bad patch or
> maybe he's washed up.  What do ya think?

Well, if I just scored a triple century the last thing I'd be thinking is
"let's make radical changes." He can't bat since losing the weight, and
really ought to gain the weight back ASAP. (One of my friends had great
success with steroids but I can't be recommending them in this case.)

 
 
 

Inzamam Ul Haq???

Post by SuperCal » Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:03:42

he needs to get that weight back,
as a skinny guy he just does not have the same potato like qualities as a
batsman


Quote:
> He used to be one of the greatest batsmen to watch but he is having a
> terrible World Cup, in the last 4 matches he has only scored 10 runs,
> what do you think is wrong with him? he lost a lot of weight which
> could possibly be a reason, maybe he's just having a bad patch or
> maybe he's washed up.  What do ya think?

 
 
 

Inzamam Ul Haq???

Post by Gambel » Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:54:38

I wonder sometimes, howcome Warney got caught but Inzy escaped?? just my
personal opinion. No flames Paki guys.
 
 
 

Inzamam Ul Haq???

Post by The Wo » Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:45:21


Quote:
> I wonder sometimes, howcome Warney got caught but Inzy escaped?? just my
> personal opinion. No flames Paki guys.

At least we KNOW Inzi's not using performance enhancing ***!
 
 
 

Inzamam Ul Haq???

Post by Boon » Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:44:54

Quote:

> He used to be one of the greatest batsmen to watch but he is having a
> terrible World Cup, in the last 4 matches he has only scored 10 runs,
> what do you think is wrong with him? he lost a lot of weight which
> could possibly be a reason, maybe he's just having a bad patch or
> maybe he's washed up.  What do ya think?

He is great to watch when on-song.

I think the problem is that when he is playing well he sees the ball very
well. Gilchrist is similar in some ways. Except Gilchrist can play his way
out of a bad spell better than Ul Haq.

He is lacking confidence at the moment and is very hesitant and probably
worried about getting out. He is not playing his normal game.

Hopefully he gets his confidence back soon. He is great to watch.

Boony

 
 
 

Inzamam Ul Haq???

Post by Graem » Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:27:48

A course of pies should do it...


Quote:


> > He used to be one of the greatest batsmen to watch but he is having a
> > terrible World Cup, in the last 4 matches he has only scored 10 runs,
> > what do you think is wrong with him? he lost a lot of weight which
> > could possibly be a reason, maybe he's just having a bad patch or
> > maybe he's washed up.  What do ya think?

> Well, if I just scored a triple century the last thing I'd be thinking is
> "let's make radical changes." He can't bat since losing the weight, and
> really ought to gain the weight back ASAP. (One of my friends had great
> success with steroids but I can't be recommending them in this case.)