by T » Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:23:24
Just thought I'd get that in before Muralicheat starts chucking out
the Black Craps (TM).
by higg » Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:15:06
> Just thought I'd get that in before Muralicheat starts chucking out
> the Black Craps (TM).
The rational, well thought out, well argued and irrefutable PoV of the
anti-Murali brigade
Higgs
by Jellor » Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:18:07
> Just thought I'd get that in before Muralicheat starts chucking out
> the Black Craps (TM).
by CDK » Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:31:19
>> Just thought I'd get that in before Muralicheat starts chucking out
>> the Black Craps (TM).
> Ah.
> The rational, well thought out, well argued and irrefutable PoV of the
> anti-Murali brigade
CDK
by higg » Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:29:30
> >> Just thought I'd get that in before Muralicheat starts chucking out
> >> the Black Craps (TM).
> > Ah.
> > The rational, well thought out, well argued and irrefutable PoV of the
> > anti-Murali brigade
> Makes more sense than most of the shite the Murali arselicking brigade
> come up with.
> CDK
Higgs
by dechuck » Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:03:40
> Just thought I'd get that in before Muralicheat starts chucking out
> the Black Craps (TM).
The rational, well thought out, well argued and irrefutable PoV of the
anti-Murali brigade
====================================================
Ah another blatant lying comment from Huggies
by dechuck » Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:04:32
> Just thought I'd get that in before Muralicheat starts chucking out
> the Black Craps (TM).
=====================================
Jayewardene's chucks his bat? interesting
by Andrew Dunfor » Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:21:23
>> >> Just thought I'd get that in before Muralicheat starts chucking out
>> >> the Black Craps (TM).
>> > Ah.
>> > The rational, well thought out, well argued and irrefutable PoV of the
>> > anti-Murali brigade
>> Makes more sense than most of the shite the Murali arselicking brigade
>> come up with.
>> CDK
> To me it comes across as as nothing more than a childish taunt from a
> bigot and a fool, devoid of any intellectual value.
> Perhaps that's what similar-minded people appreciate in it
Andrew
by dechuck » Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:42:42
>>> >> MURALITHARAN MURALITHARAN CHUCKING CHEAT MURALITHARAN!
>>> >> MURALITHARAN MURALITHARAN CHUCKING CHEAT MURALITHARAN!
>>> >> MURALITHARAN MURALITHARAN CHUCKING CHEAT MURALITHARAN!
>>> >> MURALITHARAN MURALITHARAN CHUCKING CHEAT MURALITHARAN!
>>> >> Just thought I'd get that in before Muralicheat starts chucking out
>>> >> the Black Craps (TM).
>>> > Ah.
>>> > The rational, well thought out, well argued and irrefutable PoV of the
>>> > anti-Murali brigade
>>> Makes more sense than most of the shite the Murali arselicking brigade
>>> come up with.
>>> CDK
>> To me it comes across as as nothing more than a childish taunt from a
>> bigot and a fool, devoid of any intellectual value.
>> Perhaps that's what similar-minded people appreciate in it
> To me it wouldn't come across at all, if only people could just ignore and
> not feel compelled to respond.
by T » Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:32:58
by CDK » Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:20:43
>> CDK
> To me it comes across as as nothing more than a childish taunt from a
> bigot and a fool, devoid of any intellectual value.
> Perhaps that's what similar-minded people appreciate in it
CDK
by alve » Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:35:55
> Just thought I'd get that in before Muralicheat starts chucking out
> the Black Craps (TM).
Murali chucks,
you bore.
Post this once more
and you'll be shown the door.
alvey
by higg » Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:59:57
> >> CDK
> > To me it comes across as as nothing more than a childish taunt from a
> > bigot and a fool, devoid of any intellectual value.
> > Perhaps that's what similar-minded people appreciate in it
> Tell me paul, didn't the last test that Murali took at the UWA show his
> action to be illegal?
I know Bruce Elliott (of UWA) raised concerns about the doosra in
2004, but when Murali was tested again in 2006 (at UWA), he was found
to be within legal limits.
To quote Elliott (from Cricinfo):
'There's nothing more he could do," said Bruce Elliot, a UWA
scientist. "The latest testing shows, irrespective of whether he's
bowling a doosra or an off-break, all his deliveries were under 15
degrees, so none were illegal." He said Muralitharan was bowling
faster because of a shoulder surgery he underwent in 2004.'
Note the comment "so none were illegal".
Has he been tested since 2006?
I'm sure you'd know, because you keep a close eye on this sort of
thing, but certainly in 2006, he was fine.
Higgs
by CDK » Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:59:14
> Not to my knowledge.
> I know Bruce Elliott (of UWA) raised concerns about the doosra in
> 2004, but when Murali was tested again in 2006 (at UWA), he was found
> to be within legal limits.
> To quote Elliott (from Cricinfo):
> 'There's nothing more he could do," said Bruce Elliot, a UWA
> scientist. "The latest testing shows, irrespective of whether he's
> bowling a doosra or an off-break, all his deliveries were under 15
> degrees, so none were illegal." He said Muralitharan was bowling
> faster because of a shoulder surgery he underwent in 2004.'
> Note the comment "so none were illegal".
> Has he been tested since 2006?
> I'm sure you'd know, because you keep a close eye on this sort of
> thing, but certainly in 2006, he was fine.
And he barely scraped under the 15 degrees with straightening in the
high 14 degrees for his chuckra
CDK
by Yuk Tan » Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:26:17
> To me it wouldn't come across at all, if only people could just
> ignore and not feel compelled to respond.
--
Cheers, ymt.
1. Muralitharan Muralitharan Chucking Cheat Muralitharan!
2. Muralitharan, Muralitharan chucking cheat Muralitharan
3. Muralitharan Muralitharan chucking cheat Muralitharan!
4. Muralitharan Muralitharan Chucking Cheat Muralitharan!
5. Muralitharan Muralitharan Chucking Cheat Muralitharan
6. Muralitharan Muralitharan chucking cheat Muralitharan
7. Muralitharan Muralitharan Chucking Cheat Muralitharan!