South Africa has the number one in all four ICC Test Ranking
categories- Amla batting, Steyn bowling and Kallis allroundering, as
well as obviously being the top ranked team.
Has this ever happened before?
Has this ever happened before?
> Has this ever happened before?
> > Has this ever happened before?
> Yes. SG Law held all the individual rankings simultaneously and carried the
> team to #1 as well.
> > > South Africa has the number one in all four ICC Test Ranking
> > > categories- Amla batting, Steyn bowling and Kallis allroundering, as
> > > well as obviously being the top ranked team.
> > > Has this ever happened before?
> > Yes. SG Law held all the individual rankings simultaneously and carried the
> > team to #1 as well.
> I'll take that as a No then.
> Has this ever happened before?
> > Has this ever happened before?
> Might depend on how far back you're prepared to go. After the 1948 Ashes, Bradman was the top batsman, Lindwall the top bowler and (I suspect) Miller the top all-rounder.
>Has this ever happened before?
Cheers,
Mike
--
> >South Africa has the number one in all four ICC Test Ranking
> >categories- Amla batting, Steyn bowling and Kallis allroundering, as
> >well as obviously being the top ranked team.
> >Has this ever happened before?
> No. South Africa have never before been top in all those categories at
> once.
>> Has this ever happened before?
>Might depend on how far back you're prepared to go. After the 1948 Ashes, Bradman was the top batsman, Lindwall the top bowler and (I suspect) Miller the top all-rounder.
it's possible you'd have a time when Rhodes or Woolley was the top
allrounder, Hobbs the top batsman and Barnes the top bowler
--
"Hope is replaced by fear and dreams by survival, most of us get by."
Stuart Adamson 1958-2001
Mad Hamish
Hamish Laws
> Has this ever happened before?
> >South Africa has the number one in all four ICC Test Ranking
> >categories- Amla batting, Steyn bowling and Kallis allroundering, as
> >well as obviously being the top ranked team.
> >Has this ever happened before?
> No. South Africa have never before been top in all those categories at
> once.
> > South Africa has the number one in all four ICC Test Ranking
> > categories- Amla batting, Steyn bowling and Kallis allroundering, as
> > well as obviously being the top ranked team.
> > Has this ever happened before?
> Don't know. I do know that for most of the time international cricket
> has been played there were no rankings, so, to use the obvious
> example, Clive Lloyd's West Indies teams never held all the top spots
> in the rankings because there were no rankings.
> > South Africa has the number one in all four ICC Test Ranking
> > categories- Amla batting, Steyn bowling and Kallis allroundering, as
> > well as obviously being the top ranked team.
> > Has this ever happened before?
> Don't know. I do know that for most of the time international cricket
> has been played there were no rankings, so, to use the obvious
> example, Clive Lloyd's West Indies teams never held all the top spots
> in the rankings because there were no rankings.
Check it out:
http://www.relianceiccrankings.com/datespecific/test/
> >> South Africa has the number one in all four ICC Test Ranking
> >> categories- Amla batting, Steyn bowling and Kallis allroundering, as
> >> well as obviously being the top ranked team.
> >> Has this ever happened before?
> >Might depend on how far back you're prepared to go. After the 1948 Ashes, Bradman was the top batsman, Lindwall the top bowler and (I suspect) Miller the top all-rounder.
> Could be interesting around WWI as well.
> it's possible you'd have a time when Rhodes or Woolley was the top
> allrounder, Hobbs the top batsman and Barnes the top bowler
>> > South Africa has the number one in all four ICC Test Ranking
>> > categories- Amla batting, Steyn bowling and Kallis allroundering, as
>> > well as obviously being the top ranked team.
>> > Has this ever happened before?
>> Don't know. I do know that for most of the time international cricket
>> has been played there were no rankings, so, to use the obvious
>> example, Clive Lloyd's West Indies teams never held all the top spots
>> in the rankings because there were no rankings.
>They never held all the top spots in the retrospective rankings
>because at the time the best all-rounders were Botham, Hadlee,
>Imran and Kapil while the WI just had great bowlers who could
>bat a bit.
"Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong."
Oscar Wilde
1. Question regarding the ICC test rankings
2. India move up the ICC test rankings
3. ICC Test Cricket Player rankings...Brian Lara
5. ICC test rankings are BRIILIANT!
7. Three Indian bowlers in the top ten in the official ICC test rankings
9. India is now second in the ICC Test rankings, replacing England
11. ICC ODI Team Rankings after the Champions Trophy
12. was PWC(is LG ICC) rankings
13. Now .. is IND no. 2 in ICC rankings??