Sport Today

by **Kames** » Sun, 25 Aug 2002 00:24:55

OK...this is a little bit too premature, but who do you think will be the
one to take most wickets for India in T3I1.

My vote in order of preference
1) Sachin Tendulkar (provided Ganguly gives him a bowl)
2) Bangar
3) Zaheer
4) Harbhajan
5) Kumble
6) Agarkar

cheers
-Kamesh
[Sachin is the only one who would exploit the conditions. Deserves a good
bowl here]

by **Nikhil De** » Sat, 24 Aug 2002 23:11:31

Quote:

> OK...this is a little bit too premature, but who do you think will be the
> one to take most wickets for India in T3I1.

> My vote in order of preference
> 1) Sachin Tendulkar (provided Ganguly gives him a bowl)
> 2) Bangar
> 3) Zaheer
> 4) Harbhajan
> 5) Kumble
> 6) Agarkar

> cheers
> -Kamesh
> [Sachin is the only one who would exploit the conditions. Deserves a good
> bowl here]

Kamesh,

1. Ganguly will not bowl
2. Ganguly will not have to bowl
3. Even if he bowls, he cannot be the leading wicket taker

I find it difficult to imagine that he will not bowl himself if it comes to
part-timers.

About your question, the wickets should have a mostly uniform distribution
amongst the bowlers with
Harbhajan and Agarkar(he will get the 5/6, 7/8 or 8/9 batsmen ) leading with
2/3 wickets each.

by **Kames** » Sat, 24 Aug 2002 23:54:13

Quote:

> Kamesh,

> 1. Ganguly will not bowl
> 2. Ganguly will not have to bowl
> 3. Even if he bowls, he cannot be the leading wicket taker

> I find it difficult to imagine that he will not bowl himself if it comes
to
> part-timers.

My ranking was in terms of how effective each could be, given the
conditions.

I think Sachin would be more effective as opposed to Ganguly.

Quote:

> About your question, the wickets should have a mostly uniform distribution
> amongst the bowlers with
> Harbhajan and Agarkar(he will get the 5/6, 7/8 or 8/9 batsmen ) leading
with
> 2/3 wickets each.

* If Agarkar does not bowl short, he would get wickets.
* Kumble should try to bowl with the seam up (just throw in a couple of
those) and more of the top spinners than anything else.
* In all likelihood, Bangar might not get a lot of overs either. Ganguly
would rather bowl Zaheer, Agarkar, Kumble and Bhajji and bring on himself at
a "partnership breaker" then Bangar.

How's the pitch behaving by the way.

Kamesh

by **Nikhil De** » Sun, 25 Aug 2002 00:23:43

Quote:

> My ranking was in terms of how effective each could be, given the
> conditions.

Ranking was ok. Just the fact that Ganguly would let 6 others bowl and not
bowl himself is little hard to imagine.

Quote:

> > About your question, the wickets should have a mostly uniform
distribution
> > amongst the bowlers with
> > Harbhajan and Agarkar(he will get the 5/6, 7/8 or 8/9 batsmen ) leading
> with
> > 2/3 wickets each.

> * If Agarkar does not bowl short, he would get wickets.

His line and length is a function of NASDAQ, British weather and current
form of Goran Ivanisevic.
He better gets his act straight in this game.

by **Kames** » Sun, 25 Aug 2002 00:40:14

Quote:

> > * If Agarkar does not bowl short, he would get wickets.

> His line and length is a function of NASDAQ, British weather and current
> form of Goran Ivanisevic.
> He better gets his act straight in this game.

:-)

kamesh

Sport Today

Who will be the highest wicket taker?

Who will be the highest wicket taker?

Who will be the highest wicket taker?

Who will be the highest wicket taker?

Who will be the highest wicket taker?

Who will be the highest wicket taker?