Why Ponting is the MoM?

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by yeska » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 04:07:13


Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright violations) WI bowling
Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee, Gillespie and Bichel
 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Net_hea » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 04:15:20

Quote:
> Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright
> violations) WI bowling
> Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee,
> Gillespie and Bichel

Another copyright violation should answer this (I think it was RK who
came up with this originally on rsc):

"Jo Jeeta woh Sikander, Jo hara woh...."

Translation: The one who wins is the King, The one who loses...

Cheers,
Net_head

--
Direct access to this group with http://web2news.com
http://web2news.com/?rec.sport.cricket

 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Raghu Jetle » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 04:18:01

Quote:

>> Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright
>> violations) WI bowling
>> Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee,
>> Gillespie and Bichel

> Another copyright violation should answer this (I think it was RK who
> came up with this originally on rsc):

> "Jo Jeeta woh Sikander, Jo hara woh...."

Both the quotes rhyme rather well

1) Jo Jeeta woh *Sikandar*, Jo hara woh *Tendulkar*
2) Jo Jeeta woh Sikander, Jo *Hara* woh *Lara*

Quote:

> Translation: The one who wins is the King, The one who loses...

> Cheers,
> Net_head


 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Nikhil De » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 06:11:06


Quote:

> >> Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright
> >> violations) WI bowling
> >> Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee,
> >> Gillespie and Bichel

> > Another copyright violation should answer this (I think it was RK who
> > came up with this originally on rsc):

> > "Jo Jeeta woh Sikander, Jo hara woh...."

> Both the quotes rhyme rather well

> 1) Jo Jeeta woh *Sikandar*, Jo hara woh *Tendulkar*
> 2) Jo Jeeta woh Sikander, Jo *Hara* woh *Lara*

Good ones! :)
 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Shekhar Kal » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 07:37:14


Quote:
> > Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright
> > violations) WI bowling
> > Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee,
> > Gillespie and Bichel

> Another copyright violation should answer this (I think it was RK who
> came up with this originally on rsc):

> "Jo Jeeta woh Sikander, Jo hara woh...."

> Translation: The one who wins is the King, The one who loses...

Bandar (Monkey)
 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Wayn » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 08:56:38


Quote:
> Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright violations) WI bowling
> Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee, Gillespie and

Bichel

1) You assume that the Aussie attack is better.  Maybe the bowling strengths
were similar and the Aussie batting is superior.
2) If Lara had made 206 in the second dig, it is likely the WI would have
won.  Ponting's 206 was a superior innings.
3) As pointed out by others, Australia won.  This is usually a factor when
deciding MOTM.

Gilly
(Still wondering how Lee dropped Lara on 6)

 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Will Sutto » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:02:38

Quote:

> Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright violations) WI bowling
> Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee, Gillespie and Bichel

how many centuries have been scored in Tests ?

how many double centuries have been scored in Tests ?

 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Narendra Karambelka » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 10:57:22


Quote:
> Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright violations) WI bowling
> Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee, Gillespie and

Bichel

As per r.s.c guidelines "useless" innings dont fetch MOM .... :-))

 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by dechuck » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:39:57

MOTM.

Quote:

> Gilly
> (Still wondering how Lee dropped Lara on 6)

It was a hard return catch they stick or they don't
 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Aditya Basru » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:37:52


Quote:




Quote:
> > Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright violations) WI bowling
> > Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee, Gillespie and
Bichel

> how many centuries have been scored in Tests ?

Tons.

Quote:
> how many double centuries have been scored in Tests ?

http://www-nz.cricket.org/link_to_database/STATS/TESTS/BATTING/TEST_B...
INNS_200S.html

HTH,

Aditya

 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by kenhigg » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:45:07

Quote:


> > Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright violations) WI bowling
> > Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee, Gillespie and Bichel

> how many centuries have been scored in Tests ?

> how many double centuries have been scored in Tests ?

"I agree, but how many real quality test attacks has Sachin tore
apart?  I
saw his 200 against Zim, it was ordinary, Gilly's 200 was awesome
power
hitting.

Gavin"

So there are double centuries and double centuries.

I suspect this one was a double century

(and I heard on the news that when he (Ponting) was out, it was
*nearly* another mistake by Ashocka. Larry does have a point, you
know)

Higgsy

 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Will Sutto » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:03:30

Quote:



> > > Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright violations) WI bowling
> > > Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee, Gillespie and Bichel

> > how many centuries have been scored in Tests ?

> > how many double centuries have been scored in Tests ?

> "I agree, but how many real quality test attacks has Sachin tore
> apart?  I
> saw his 200 against Zim, it was ordinary, Gilly's 200 was awesome
> power
> hitting.

> Gavin"

> So there are double centuries and double centuries.

> I suspect this one was a double century

> (and I heard on the news that when he (Ponting) was out, it was
> *nearly* another mistake by Ashocka. Larry does have a point, you
> know)

> Higgsy

Larry doesn't have a point. Rudi gave 3 shockers in the 2 Tests but Asoka
outdid him easily. If it had been Vengat or even old Shep we would have been calling for
their heads. The umpiring from Asoka was like the Windies bowling, just not
up to Test standard.

I hope Asoka goes back, looks at the tapes and works on his skills and comes
back better and tougher.

 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by dechuck » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:38:22




Quote:
> > > Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright violations) WI
bowling
> > > Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee, Gillespie
and Bichel

> > how many centuries have been scored in Tests ?

> > how many double centuries have been scored in Tests ?

> "I agree, but how many real quality test attacks has Sachin tore
> apart?  I
> saw his 200 against Zim, it was ordinary, Gilly's 200 was awesome
> power
> hitting.

> Gavin"

> So there are double centuries and double centuries.

> I suspect this one was a double century

well done got something correct

Quote:

> (and I heard on the news that when he (Ponting) was out, it was
> *nearly* another mistake by Ashocka. Larry does have a point, you
> know)

didn't see it, don't know what you are talking about***off than the
***s want to talk cricket
 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Andrew Dunfor » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 21:52:15


Quote:





> > > Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright violations) WI
bowling
> > > Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee, Gillespie
and
> Bichel

> > how many centuries have been scored in Tests ?

> Tons.

You're allowed to call them 'tons' if you like, but I really don't think you
have any right to criticise Will Sutton for using the more-traditional
'centuries'.  Will is a formal kind of guy and likes to have his terminology
correct.

On which subject, I note an inclination in some quarters to go metric.  From
an article I read yesterday at Stuff:

"He [Mark Richardson] was within reach of his third century in a row after
ending the State Championship season with a tonne for Auckland."

Andrew

 
 
 

Why Ponting is the MoM?

Post by Devd » Fri, 25 Apr 2003 22:21:34

Quote:

> Ponting: 206+45 batting against raddi (copyright violations) WI bowling
> Lara: 122+91, lone fighter against a better attack of Lee, Gillespie and Bichel

How about Lehmann's 160+66? The quick 66 allowed an early declaration
and the 160 was as good as the 206.

Devdas