Sport Today

> Jacques Kallis - Rated #9

> "I don't see anything in Kallis's bowling which leads me to
> think he's anything but a harmless trundler."
> Mike Holmans (2003-08-05)

> Andrew Flintoff - Rated #56  (close to Aggy at #59)
> "From what I've seen of late, Kallis isn't as good a bowler
> as Flintoff, especially in hittability terms."
> Mike Holmans(2003-07-16)

> Pollock current PWC Rating 870
> Gough All time high PWC Rating 789
> Shaun Pollock - Rated #1
> "I don't see any particular reason to think that Pollock/Ntini isn't
> comparable to Gough/Anderson as an opening combo - Pollock is less
> threatening than he used to be, but Gough is still uncertain of
> fitness, Ntini may well be inconsistent but so is Anderson."
> Mike Holmans (2003-08-25)

> "Pollock nowadays bowls maiden overs and leaves it to Ntini to
> take the wickets"
> Mike Holmans (2003-08-05)

> Who cares, PWC is ***- I saw all of them bowl.

> Jacques Kallis - Rated #9

> "I don't see anything in Kallis's bowling which leads me to
> think he's anything but a harmless trundler."
> Mike Holmans (2003-08-05)

> Andrew Flintoff - Rated #56  (close to Aggy at #59)
> "From what I've seen of late, Kallis isn't as good a bowler
> as Flintoff, especially in hittability terms."
> Mike Holmans(2003-07-16)

> Pollock current PWC Rating 870
> Gough All time high PWC Rating 789
> Shaun Pollock - Rated #1
> "I don't see any particular reason to think that Pollock/Ntini isn't
> comparable to Gough/Anderson as an opening combo - Pollock is less
> threatening than he used to be, but Gough is still uncertain of
> fitness, Ntini may well be inconsistent but so is Anderson."
> Mike Holmans (2003-08-25)

> "Pollock nowadays bowls maiden overs and leaves it to Ntini to
> take the wickets"
> Mike Holmans (2003-08-05)

> Who cares, PWC is ***- I saw all of them bowl.

> > Test Match Bowler Ratings

> > Jacques Kallis - Rated #9

> > "I don't see anything in Kallis's bowling which leads me to
> > think he's anything but a harmless trundler."
> > Mike Holmans (2003-08-05)

> > Andrew Flintoff - Rated #56  (close to Aggy at #59)
> > "From what I've seen of late, Kallis isn't as good a bowler
> > as Flintoff, especially in hittability terms."
> > Mike Holmans(2003-07-16)

> > Pollock current PWC Rating 870
> > Gough All time high PWC Rating 789
> > Shaun Pollock - Rated #1
> > "I don't see any particular reason to think that Pollock/Ntini isn't
> > comparable to Gough/Anderson as an opening combo - Pollock is less
> > threatening than he used to be, but Gough is still uncertain of
> > fitness, Ntini may well be inconsistent but so is Anderson."
> > Mike Holmans (2003-08-25)

> > "Pollock nowadays bowls maiden overs and leaves it to Ntini to
> > take the wickets"
> > Mike Holmans (2003-08-05)

> > Who cares, PWC is ***- I saw all of them bowl.

> So from now on PWC ratings = PWC, Who Cares? ratings.

> Rajagopal