Sport Today

by **Jay** » Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:00:00

ICC is pushing for all players/administrators found guilty of match
fixing after July 1, 1993. Why are not they considering all games and
not after a certain time frame?? Do we see personal agendas against
certain players/teams?

by **Alvey Sidecas** » Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:00:00

Quote:

>ICC is pushing for all players/administrators found guilty of
match
>fixing after July 1, 1993. Why are not they considering all
games and
>not after a certain time frame?? Do we see personal agendas
against
>certain players/teams?

Isn't 7 years a commonly adopted statutory period?

Alvey

Got questions? Get answers over the phone at Keen.com.
Up to 100 minutes free!
http://www.keen.com

by **Raza Rahma** » Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:00:00

Alvery:

I don't know, is it? Let us know when you find out.

Quote:

> >ICC is pushing for all players/administrators found guilty of
> match
> >fixing after July 1, 1993. Why are not they considering all
> games and
> >not after a certain time frame?? Do we see personal agendas
> against
> >certain players/teams?

> Isn't 7 years a commonly adopted statutory period?

> Alvey

> Got questions? Get answers over the phone at Keen.com.
> Up to 100 minutes free!
> http://www.keen.com

by **Shehzad H** » Mon, 26 Jun 2000 04:00:00

On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:41:26 -0700, Alvey Sidecast

Quote:

>>ICC is pushing for all players/administrators found guilty of
>match
>>fixing after July 1, 1993. Why are not they considering all
>games and
>>not after a certain time frame?? Do we see personal agendas
>against
>>certain players/teams?

>Isn't 7 years a commonly adopted statutory period?

But ICC does not have to adopt that statutory period. Since it
controls the sport it can adopt any period it chooses to.

Question: If the above date was chosen, would Warne and Waugh be home
free ??

by **Colin Gor** » Mon, 26 Jun 2000 04:00:00

Quote:

> Question: If the above date was chosen, would Warne and Waugh be home
> free ??

Warne and Waugh didn't fix matches, and when Malik approached them, they
needed no team consensus to tell the bastard where to stick it.

On the evidence available, I think Mark and Shane will emerge with (rightly)
tainted reps, and that's all.

Col

by **Mad Hami** » Mon, 26 Jun 2000 04:00:00

Quote:

>On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:41:26 -0700, Alvey Sidecast

>>>ICC is pushing for all players/administrators found guilty of
>>match
>>>fixing after July 1, 1993. Why are not they considering all
>>games and
>>>not after a certain time frame?? Do we see personal agendas
>>against
>>>certain players/teams?

>>Isn't 7 years a commonly adopted statutory period?

>But ICC does not have to adopt that statutory period. Since it
>controls the sport it can adopt any period it chooses to.

Dunno, there might be legal challenges opened if other numbers were
chosen.
It's also true to say that anyone who is still playing and was
involved in match fixing before 93 was probably fixing matches after
that.

Quote:

>Question: If the above date was chosen, would Warne and Waugh be home
>free ??

Warne made his ODI debut in March 93 vs NZ he played his next ODI in
Dec 1993.
As I recall the series that Warne and Waugh provided information was
just before the test series against Pakistan which was in 94...

So it would appear that their actions come under the commision's
timespan.

Sport Today

why push ban for July 1 1993 after match-fixers only?

why push ban for July 1 1993 after match-fixers only?

why push ban for July 1 1993 after match-fixers only?

why push ban for July 1 1993 after match-fixers only?

why push ban for July 1 1993 after match-fixers only?

why push ban for July 1 1993 after match-fixers only?

why push ban for July 1 1993 after match-fixers only?