Pak vs NZ 3rd ODI, plus Aus vs WI 5th day

Pak vs NZ 3rd ODI, plus Aus vs WI 5th day

Post by Aamir Husa » Thu, 31 Dec 1992 11:05:38


i am catching both radio australia(not that good reception on 21740)
and RNZ at 17750

Pakistan made 139(?) all out (see post by A. Qadir)

NZ are 23/1 in(8), 33/1 in(9), 34/2 in(10), 34/2 in(11), 34/2 in(12),
       35/2 in(13), 36/2 in(14).
figures in brackets are over number
latham - 0 out
greatbach - 14 no(8), 24 no(9), 24 out ct Musthaq b akram at 34/2
jones - 5 no(8), 5 no(9), 6 no(10), 7
m. crowe

akram 4-0-0-16, 5-0-1-17, 6-1-1-17, 7-1-1-18
waqar 4-2-1-7,
anjum 1-0-0-10, 2-1-0-10, 3-1-0-10

trivia kapil 232 ODI wkts
       akram 185 wkts oops 186 as i was typing this, S/R about 3.5

at the MCG WI vs Aus 5th day 1st session

Windies are 135/1 target 359
richardson out 52 2nd wkt to fall
simmons 80 not out
windies now 144/2

Aamir

 
 
 

Pak vs NZ 3rd ODI, plus Aus vs WI 5th day

Post by Aamir Husa » Thu, 31 Dec 1992 11:26:18

Quote:

> NZ are 23/1 in(8), 33/1 in(9), 34/2 in(10), 34/2 in(11), 34/2 in(12),
>        35/2 in(13), 36/2 in(14).
> figures in brackets are over number
> latham - 0 out
> greatbach - 14 no(8), 24 no(9), 24 out ct Musthaq b akram at 34/2
> jones - 5 no(8), 5 no(9), 6 no(10), 7
> m. crowe

> akram 4-0-0-16, 5-0-1-17, 6-1-1-17, 7-1-1-18
> waqar 4-2-1-7,
> anjum 1-0-0-10, 2-1-0-10, 3-1-0-11

update
NZ 40/2 in (16) 100 more required, 41/2 in (17), 45/2 in(19)
latham - out
greatbach - 24 out
jones-8 no in (17), 9 out lbw anjum, wkt fell at 45
crowe-2 no in (17), 5 no in (19)
rutherford - o no in (19)

musthaq and anjum bowling
anjum 5-1-0-13, 6-1-1-16
mushtaq 2 overs

9 runs off the last 9 overs

lunch still at the MCG

Aamir

 
 
 

Pak vs NZ 3rd ODI, plus Aus vs WI 5th day

Post by Aamir Husa » Thu, 31 Dec 1992 11:53:18

update

NZ 58/3 in (24), 63/3 in (25), 67/3 in (26), 70/3 in (27)
crowe - 22 not
rutherford - 7 not
extras - 7
anjum 8-1-1-21, 9-1-1-26, 10-1-1-29
mushtaq 6-?-0-14

at the MCG
WI are 148/3
lara -4 out c boon b whitley at 148

Aamir

 
 
 

Pak vs NZ 3rd ODI, plus Aus vs WI 5th day

Post by Aamir Husa » Thu, 31 Dec 1992 12:18:24

update
NZ 77/3 in (29), 83/3 in (30), 89/3 in (31), 90/3 in (32)
crowe - 25 no, 26, 28,
rutherford - 11, 16, 20, 21,

musthaq 7-1-0-16
waqar 5-1-1-12, 6-1-1-13
sohail 1-0-0-6
malik 1 over
waqar bowling over number 30. he's back on

at the MCG
WI 169/4, 178/5
arthurton out at score 169/4
hooper-  out c whitney b warne 177/5
adams new bat in

Aamir

 
 
 

Pak vs NZ 3rd ODI, plus Aus vs WI 5th day

Post by Aamir Husa » Thu, 31 Dec 1992 12:54:08

update

NZ are  105/4 in (36), 110/4 in (37), 122/4 in 39 i guess

crowe - 34, 39, 45 no
rutherford - 28 out b musthaq 105/4
harris - 6 no

waqar 7-2-1-15, 8-2-1-20,

RNZ has gone off the air, so this is probably my
last posting. anyway New Zealand are nearly home
well they are home anyway but they are close to winning

at the MCG 1 hr before tea WI are 189/5

Aamir

 
 
 

Pak vs NZ 3rd ODI, plus Aus vs WI 5th day

Post by Aamir Husa » Thu, 31 Dec 1992 13:09:31

getting RNZ now at 15120 KHZ, this seems like a new freq to me
very faint signal now
NZ are 124/4 in (41) 133/4 in (42)
crowe - 34, 39, 45, 52  no
rutherford - 28 out b musthaq 105/4
harris - 6 no

waqar 7-2-1-15, 8-2-1-20, 10-2-1-27
akram on 9-2-1-28

New Zealand win by 6wkts
take the series 2-1

Aamir

 
 
 

Pak vs NZ 3rd ODI, plus Aus vs WI 5th day

Post by Paul Engli » Thu, 31 Dec 1992 14:03:17

Australia has won the Second test by 139 runs, just before tea on the final
day.

        395 (M. Waugh 112, Border 110.
             Walsh 4/91, Ambrose 3/71, Bishop 3/82)

    and 196 (Martyn 67*, Taylor 42.
             Bishop 3/45, Simmons 2/34, Walsh 2/42, Ambrose 2/57)

West Indies:

        233 (Arthurton 71, Lara 52, Adams 47.
             McDermott 4/66, Hughes 3/51)

    and 219 (Simmons 110, Richardson 52.
             Warne 7/52)

Man of the Match: Shane Warne (Aus).

Series: Australia leads 1-0 after two tests of a five test series.

Australia has named an unchanged 12 for the 3rd test starting in Sydney on
the 2nd of January.

--
    Paul English    |Email:                        |You can tell how far