What would the cricket world (and the media) do without this guy?
Does anyone want to guess his 'post-cricket' career?
Vicky:
[Who was guilty in the Lancs match?]
by vignes1.. » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:01:02
Does anyone want to guess his 'post-cricket' career?
Vicky:
[Who was guilty in the Lancs match?]
by Will_ » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:15:21
> Does anyone want to guess his 'post-cricket' career?
> Vicky:
> [Who was guilty in the Lancs match?]
by vignes1.. » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:38:26
Now, I don't think you can speak for other people. I guess, most of
the people here would want to stay away from it (and you).
Vicky:
{getting ready for the Finals]
> > Does anyone want to guess his 'post-cricket' career?
> > Vicky:
> > [Who was guilty in the Lancs match?]
by prakme » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:31:52
> Sorry Will, I didn't know a *** will give you (singular) some
> peace. Hats off to you for coming out of the closet. But, can't you
> buy one yourself? I don't know much about your requirements in a
> ***.
> Now, I don't think you can speak for other people. I guess, most of
> the people here would want to stay away from it (and you).
> Vicky:
> {getting ready for the Finals]
BTW, do you think that Ponting will get suspended today when he argues
with the umpire again :-)
So do I.
Prakash
> > > What would the cricket world (and the media) do without this guy?
> > > Does anyone want to guess his 'post-cricket' career?
> > > Vicky:
> > > [Who was guilty in the Lancs match?]
by Will_ » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:02:14
> Sorry Will, I didn't know a *** will give you (singular) some
> peace. Hats off to you for coming out of the closet. But, can't you
> buy one yourself? I don't know much about your requirements in a
> ***.
> Now, I don't think you can speak for other people. I guess, most of
> the people here would want to stay away from it (and you).
by vignes1.. » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:42:03
My grammar is not good enough to understand Will_S .
Will: Are you talking about you here? Now, which 'you' is really you?
You are certainly not among the 'people like me'. But, thanks for
keeping the RSC entertained.
This is my last posting on this topic.
Vicky:
[Warne's behaviour in the last match?]
> > Sorry Will, I didn't know a *** will give you (singular) some
> > peace. Hats off to you for coming out of the closet. But, can't you
> > buy one yourself? I don't know much about your requirements in a
> > ***.
> look I dont know if they make them big enough for you but keep trying
> > Now, I don't think you can speak for other people. I guess, most of
> > the people here would want to stay away from it (and you).
> Thats the idea of the net Vicky, you can stay away from people like you but
> at the same time get a good laugh at the ***they write
by maie » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:46:00
> My grammar is not good enough to understand Will_S .
> Will: Are you talking about you here? Now, which 'you' is really you?
> You are certainly not among the 'people like me'. But, thanks for
> keeping the RSC entertained.
> This is my last posting on this topic.
by vignes1.. » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:47:08
I don't make decisions before the incident.
A low scoring game would have kept the teams under emotional stress. I
I were to guess, I would say, 240 is a decent score for Australians to
defend.
We have another 4 hours to, right?
Vicky:
> So do I.
> Prakash
by Mike Holman » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:28:02
>> What would the cricket world (and the media) do without this guy?
>> Does anyone want to guess his 'post-cricket' career?
>> Vicky:
>> [Who was guilty in the Lancs match?]
>if we all put in a couple of cents will yoo buy a *** and give us some
>peace
In the ideal world there would be a "cricket" ng which would attract
Robert Henderson, Vicky, Jon Jonsen, Marco, Sampath and their fellow
bigots, leaving the rest of us to get on with discussing cricket.
Cheers,
Mike
--
England's one-day team are a bit better than Don II's posts.
by Will_ » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:28:00
> My grammar is not good enough to understand Will_S
> Will: Are you talking about you here? Now, which 'you' is really you?
> You are certainly not among the 'people like me'. But, thanks for
> keeping the RSC entertained.
> This is my last posting on this topic.
by Will_ » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:35:37
>>> What would the cricket world (and the media) do without this guy?
>>> Does anyone want to guess his 'post-cricket' career?
>>> Vicky:
>>> [Who was guilty in the Lancs match?]
>>if we all put in a couple of cents will yoo buy a *** and give us
>>some
>>peace
> Will, there is little point in keeping racist trolls whose sole reason
> for existence is to post anti-Australian abuse out of your killfile.
> You don't have to froth at the mouth and be completely ignorant of
> both cricket and the English language to be a thorough-going racist,
> as Vicky's posting history shows. How galling it must be for him to
> find that the Lancashire captain has stuck his hand up and admitted
> that he was in the wrong and that Warne was quite entitled to be
> upset, although since that was in the original report I read, I
> strongly suspect that it was also in the report which the poisonous
> little shit Vicky read and that as usual his post had no purpose but
> to demonstrate how wonderfully anti-Australian he is.
> In the ideal world there would be a "cricket" ng which would attract
> Robert Henderson, Vicky, Jon Jonsen, Marco, Sampath and their fellow
> bigots, leaving the rest of us to get on with discussing cricket.
> Cheers,
> Mike
> --
> England's one-day team are a bit better than Don II's posts.
You can ignore them, put them in your kill file and that makes good
sense but that is something I have never had much off. Anyway that is
something about the Ashes, the abuse will be there but wont be masked behind
racist taunts. Its not far off now for the most anticipated series in the
last 50 years .....
Will_S
by Grinne » Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:14:26
> Does anyone want to guess his 'post-cricket' career?
Warnie is a true Aussie bloke, love him or hate him, much in the spirit of
Steve Irwin without a real altruistic bone in his peroxide topped body.. He
has always been himself Imagine if /he/ curled up his toes?
by Andrew Dunfor » Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:13:20
> Does anyone want to guess his 'post-cricket' career?
> Vicky:
> [Who was guilty in the Lancs match?]
That said, with various deals being done elsewhere, it's not really as
simple as my black-and-white response.
Andrew
by eusebiu » Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:46:17
> Sorry Will, I didn't know a *** will give you (singular) some
> peace.
by Calvi » Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:09:16
>> > if we all put in a couple of cents will yoo buy a *** and give us
>> > some
>> > peace
>> Sorry Will, I didn't know a *** will give you (singular) some
>> peace.
> Umm, I wasn't aware that 'yoo' was the plural form of 'you'.
cheers,
calvin
2. Shane Warne is Sha(M)ed and Warne(D)
3. Mark Taylor sounds more like Shane Warne than Warne
4. Warne with help vs Warne without help
5. Warne v/s Tendulkar --> Warne v/s Bradman
6. Should Waugh and Warne be banned? (Was: Re: Why Mark Waugh and Shane Warne are not guilty?)
9. Warne
10. Warne hurt??? 3rd days play
12. Sir Shane Warne.
13. Shane Warne ...... A folk hero Down under
14. Year of Monkey, Year of Shane Warne