by Asho » Tue, 06 Jan 2004 15:34:23
How are follow-on statistics maintained? Can IND
claim that it got AUS to follow on?
"morally", it is a follow-on. AUS fell short by
more than 200 runs.
A "m***victory" of sorts for AUS: If they were
all-out for around 250, the follow-on would have
been imposed. Whether it is a minor or major victory
tommorrow will tell.
Ashok
by Spaceman Spif » Tue, 06 Jan 2004 15:36:58
--
stay cool,
Spaceman Spiff
Underfoot the ground is patched
With arms of ivy wrapped around the manzanita,
Stark and shiny in the breeze.
by Shripathi Kamat » Tue, 06 Jan 2004 15:45:34
> no
> > "morally", it is a follow-on. AUS fell short by
> > more than 200 runs.
> morally it is nothing.
> > A "m***victory" of sorts for AUS: If they were
> > all-out for around 250, the follow-on would have
> > been imposed. Whether it is a minor or major victory
> > tommorrow will tell.
> if aussies had been all out for even 400, the follow on would have been
Exactly!
--
Shripathi Kamath
1. Deciding to impose the follow-on
2. Follow-on Followed by Victory
3. Follow-on followed by innings win
4. Dravid's mentions the real reason the follow-on was not enforced
5. Not enforcing the follow-on
6. Follow-on not enforced after large 1st inns leads
7. Not enforcing the follow-on was the right decision after all
8. Teams winning after opponent decided not to enforce follow-on
9. Ganguly's decision to not enforce the follow-on
10. Not Enforcing Follow-on Most Frequently
11. Why India not enforced the follow-on?
12. The Follow-On