Problems for the Australian selectors

Problems for the Australian selectors

Post by Mad Hami » Wed, 01 Nov 2000 07:32:10


Well it's not an easy job.

Openers - nobody really standing out at the minute for the second
opening spot. I'd assume it goes to Hayden on the grounds that he
played the last test.

middle order - Langer, Ponting and Steve Waugh have to be in the team.
That leaves 3 names fighting for the last spot. Martyn, Mark Waugh and
Symonds. Symonds has just hit a match winning 100, Martyn has hit a
100 and Mark has made a 50.
Wouldn't suprise me to see them leave Mark in for a couple of tests as
a placeholder - if he fails he's out and they'll have more to pick
from Symonds and Martyn.
I'd rather see one of Martyn or Symonds and think that Symonds is more
likely to make a go of it at test level. OTOH Martyn got the nod in NZ
and averaged about 60, so it'd be tough to leave him out.

spinner. I'd assume that the side for the first test will have 3
quicks as it's in Brisbane. That leaves 1 spot for a spinner. Miller
or MacGill?
MacGill would be my pick but the selectors have picked Miller ahead of
him before

It's going to be be interesting to see what ways they go...

 
 
 

Problems for the Australian selectors

Post by todd » Wed, 01 Nov 2000 09:38:58

When is the side being named?
Ohh and who is gonna be vice c, gilly again?


Quote:
> Well it's not an easy job.

> Openers - nobody really standing out at the minute for the second
> opening spot. I'd assume it goes to Hayden on the grounds that he
> played the last test.

> middle order - Langer, Ponting and Steve Waugh have to be in the team.
> That leaves 3 names fighting for the last spot. Martyn, Mark Waugh and
> Symonds. Symonds has just hit a match winning 100, Martyn has hit a
> 100 and Mark has made a 50.
> Wouldn't suprise me to see them leave Mark in for a couple of tests as
> a placeholder - if he fails he's out and they'll have more to pick
> from Symonds and Martyn.
> I'd rather see one of Martyn or Symonds and think that Symonds is more
> likely to make a go of it at test level. OTOH Martyn got the nod in NZ
> and averaged about 60, so it'd be tough to leave him out.

> spinner. I'd assume that the side for the first test will have 3
> quicks as it's in Brisbane. That leaves 1 spot for a spinner. Miller
> or MacGill?
> MacGill would be my pick but the selectors have picked Miller ahead of
> him before

> It's going to be be interesting to see what ways they go...


 
 
 

Problems for the Australian selectors

Post by Colin Mcleo » Wed, 01 Nov 2000 11:00:49


Quote:
> Well it's not an easy job.

> Openers - nobody really standing out at the minute for the second
> opening spot. I'd assume it goes to Hayden on the grounds that he
> played the last test.

Slater at the moment has been taken to hospital. Things dont look good
They seem to be dropping like flies

regards
          Colin Mcleod
snip etc
regards Miller how many lefthanders are there in the windies team again

 
 
 

Problems for the Australian selectors

Post by Matthew O'Neil » Wed, 01 Nov 2000 14:09:35

Quote:

> Well it's not an easy job.

The 12 has already been picked basically. Border, Waugh and
Buchcanan have given it all away.

Hayden will open with Slater.
Martyn will miss out.
MacGill is in front of Miller but Miller is likely 12th.
Gillespie will play instead of Fleming.

Kindest Regards,
Matthew.
ICQ 1444514

 
 
 

Problems for the Australian selectors

Post by Matthew O'Neil » Wed, 01 Nov 2000 14:13:55

Quote:

> When is the side being named?
> Ohh and who is gonna be vice c, gilly again?

Gilchrist will be VC by name only but will be the next captain as he
gets the leadership experience. Steve Waugh showed his hand the
other day in the NSW team when he turned to his brother for extra
advice and not Shane Lee who is the official NSW VC.

Kindest Regards,
Matthew.
ICQ 1444514

 
 
 

Problems for the Australian selectors

Post by Ian Galbrai » Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:05:28

[snip]

:Wouldn't suprise me to see them leave Mark in for a couple of tests as
:a placeholder - if he fails he's out and they'll have more to pick
:from Symonds and Martyn.
:I'd rather see one of Martyn or Symonds and think that Symonds is more
:likely to make a go of it at test level. OTOH Martyn got the nod in NZ
:and averaged about 60, so it'd be tough to leave him out.

I'd rather see Symonds. This last 100 is more proof that he has matured
enough to be chosen. IMHO he should be chosen primarily for the longevity
aspect. If we get him in now he and Ponting will form the backbone of the
middle order for perhaps 10 years if we're lucky. Plus Symonds is a batsman
who can't be left to wither on the vine like so many of our others in
recent history.

:spinner. I'd assume that the side for the first test will have 3
:quicks as it's in Brisbane. That leaves 1 spot for a spinner. Miller
:or MacGill?
:MacGill would be my pick but the selectors have picked Miller ahead of
:him before

The left handers in the WI make it likely that Miller will be chosen. He
also did a good job in the Shield match.

--
Ian Galbraith

"To say that these men paid their shillings to watch twenty-two hirelings
kick a ball is merely to say that a violin is wood and catgut, that
Hamlet is so much paper and ink. For a shilling the Bruddersford United
AFC offered you conflict and art." - J.B. Priestley

 
 
 

Problems for the Australian selectors

Post by John P Darc » Wed, 01 Nov 2000 20:25:57

Quote:


> > When is the side being named?
> > Ohh and who is gonna be vice c, gilly again?

> Gilchrist will be VC by name only but will be the next captain as he
> gets the leadership experience. Steve Waugh showed his hand the
> other day in the NSW team when he turned to his brother for extra
> advice and not Shane Lee who is the official NSW VC.

Then this clearly indicates an attitude problem on the part of SRW.  It
is Shane Lee who will captain NSW in their Shield campaign once the
international season gets under way, and so Waugh *should* be including
him in the on-field discussions if he (Waugh) cares at all about NSW
cricket.  I might have a word to the selectors about this ...

(Of course, just who *will* be captaining NSW at the pointy end of the
season is open to speculation.  If SL makes the ODI squad then he will
be in India and miss four vital matches including both home and away
against Queensland.  I might have a word to the schedulers about this
...)

--

Cheers

John

Complete schedule of the 2000-01 Australian cricket season, plus
other international matches http://cricketweb.8m.com/calendar.htm

 
 
 

Problems for the Australian selectors

Post by greenbr.. » Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:21

Quote:
> The left handers in the WI make it likely that Miller will be chosen.
He
> also did a good job in the Shield match.

The WI lineup is all capable of playing spin. Its Lee, Mcgrath and
Gillespie that'll do us in.

Campbell
Hinds
Sarwan
Lara
Chanderpaul
Adams
Jacobs
Mclean
Dillon
Black
Walsh

Quote:
> --
> Ian Galbraith

> "To say that these men paid their shillings to watch twenty-two
hirelings
> kick a ball is merely to say that a violin is wood and catgut, that
> Hamlet is so much paper and ink. For a shilling the Bruddersford
United
> AFC offered you conflict and art." - J.B. Priestley

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
 
 
 

Problems for the Australian selectors

Post by Mike Holma » Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:20:23


opine:

Quote:
>The WI lineup is all capable of playing spin. Its Lee, Mcgrath and
>Gillespie that'll do us in.

>Campbell
>Hinds
>Sarwan
>Lara
>Chanderpaul
>Adams
>Jacobs
>Mclean
>Dillon
>Black
>Walsh

Why do you want to play Sarwan at 3 and Chanderpaul at 5? I would have
thought the other way round would be better.

Cheers,

Mike
--
1969 - most recent previous England series win over WI
1966 - most recent previous England innings victory over WI
1957 - most recent previous series v WI in which England won three matches
Will the same lengths of time have to pass before these things recur?