First class record
Vijay - 42 matches Average 48.64 8 100's
Mukund - 42 matches Average 56.95 13 100's.
Why was Vijay selected before Mukund?
by CaraMi » Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:51:58
First class record
Vijay - 42 matches Average 48.64 8 100's
Mukund - 42 matches Average 56.95 13 100's.
Why was Vijay selected before Mukund?
by Howzza » Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:02:56
> Vijay - 42 matches Average 48.64 8 100's
> Mukund - 42 matches Average 56.95 13 100's.
> Why was Vijay selected before Mukund?
by R Bharat Ra » Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:22:02
> Vijay - 42 matches Average 48.64 8 100's
> Mukund - 42 matches Average 56.95 13 100's.
> Why was Vijay selected before Mukund?
Bharat
by prabh » Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:42:11
> > First class record
> > Vijay - 42 matches Average 48.64 8 100's
> > Mukund - 42 matches Average 56.95 13 100's.
> > Why was Vijay selected before Mukund?
> Are you talking about the original pick 2-3 years ago? At that time I
> don't even know if Mukund was playing Ranji's -- he's about 4-5 years
> younger, IIRC (without looking it up)
> Bharat
Mukund is the more placid of the two, a stayer than a dasher. I've
always felt Vijay was a better bat as he's a strokeplayer but was
proved wrong this series. That said, both will be dead meat in England.
by prabh » Sun, 10 Jul 2011 03:03:19
> > > First class record
> > > Vijay - 42 matches Average 48.64 8 100's
> > > Mukund - 42 matches Average 56.95 13 100's.
> > > Why was Vijay selected before Mukund?
> > Are you talking about the original pick 2-3 years ago? At that time I
> > don't even know if Mukund was playing Ranji's -- he's about 4-5 years
> > younger, IIRC (without looking it up)
> > Bharat
> Not looking at the stats but Vijay had some good domestics around
> 2007-08 and he made 41 and 33 in his first test against Australia
> coming in at short notice. Plus some good outings at IPL Level.
> Mukund is the more placid of the two, a stayer than a dasher. I've
> always felt Vijay was a better bat as he's a strokeplayer but was
> proved wrong this series. That said, both will be dead meat in England.
V 582 58.2
M 403 50.37
V 386 77.2
M 856 85.6
V 532 88.66
M 484 48.40
M 620 56.36
by CaraMi » Sun, 10 Jul 2011 08:10:39
by Ravi » Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:27:12
> > > First class record
> > > Vijay - 42 matches Average 48.64 8 100's
> > > Mukund - 42 matches Average 56.95 13 100's.
> > > Why was Vijay selected before Mukund?
> > Are you talking about the original pick 2-3 years ago? At that time I
> > don't even know if Mukund was playing Ranji's -- he's about 4-5 years
> > younger, IIRC (without looking it up)
> > Bharat
> Not looking at the stats but Vijay had some good domestics around
> 2007-08 and he made 41 and 33 in his first test against Australia
> coming in at short notice. Plus some good outings at IPL Level.
> Mukund is the more placid of the two, a stayer than a dasher. I've
> always felt Vijay was a better bat as he's a strokeplayer but was
> proved wrong this series. That said, both will be dead meat in England.
Ravi
2. So how good is Abhinav Mukund?
3. Mukund
4. Mukund's century steadies India as Sehwag, Gambhir depart cheaply.
5. KBS is showing the wrong QF %*&%*%&$&
7. &izabob&935413& - The Times on the Web - Important Information
9. Vijay Lokapally in The Hindu
10. Good Bye to International Career for Vijay Bhardwaj
11. Vijay Bharadwaj not playing for Karnataka
12. What is the story with Vijay Dahiya
13. Whats up with Vijay Bhardwaj?
14. VIJAY HAZARE WAS A GREAT BATSMAN