Board index cricket

Miserly 10 wicket hauls

Miserly 10 wicket hauls

Post by Mohan Da » Sun, 26 Nov 2000 04:00:00


Here are all the instances when a bowler has taken 10 or more wickets in a match
at less than 5 runs/wkt:

1.9 Briggs          (Eng) 15/28  v Eng Cape Town       1889 Eng won
2.2 Ironmonger      (Aus) 11/24  v RSA Melbourne       1932 Aus won
2.7 McGrath         (Aus) 10/27  v WI  Brisbane        2000 Aus won
2.8 Toshack         (Aus) 11/31  v Ind Brisbane        1947 Aus won
3.0 Lohmann         (Eng) 15/45  v Eng Port Elizabeth  1896 Eng won
4.2 Walsh           (WI ) 13/55  v WI  Wellington      1995 WI  won
4.4 Barnes          (Eng) 13/57  v RSA The Oval        1912 Eng won
4.4 Lock            (Eng) 11/48  v WI  The Oval        1957 Eng won
4.7 Laker           (Eng) 19/90  v Aus Manchester      1956 Eng won
4.9 Woolley         (Eng) 10/49  v Eng The Oval        1912 Eng won

 
 
 
Top

Miserly 10 wicket hauls

Post by The Ghos » Sun, 26 Nov 2000 04:00:00

    The Australian press repeatedly reported McGrath's return as the most
economical ten wicket haul in history - which surprised me.

    Technically speaking, this is correct.  Of the bowlers who took exactly
ten in the match, it was the most economical.  Of course, most of us think
of a ten wicket haul as ten wickets or more in a match.

    That next?  The fastest hundred in history being disqualified because
the three-figure shot took the batsman to 103?  Seriously...


Quote:
> Here are all the instances when a bowler has taken 10 or more wickets in a
match
> at less than 5 runs/wkt:

> 1.9 Briggs          (Eng) 15/28  v Eng Cape Town       1889 Eng won
> 2.2 Ironmonger      (Aus) 11/24  v RSA Melbourne       1932 Aus won
> 2.7 McGrath         (Aus) 10/27  v WI  Brisbane        2000 Aus won
> 2.8 Toshack         (Aus) 11/31  v Ind Brisbane        1947 Aus won
> 3.0 Lohmann         (Eng) 15/45  v Eng Port Elizabeth  1896 Eng won
> 4.2 Walsh           (WI ) 13/55  v WI  Wellington      1995 WI  won
> 4.4 Barnes          (Eng) 13/57  v RSA The Oval        1912 Eng won
> 4.4 Lock            (Eng) 11/48  v WI  The Oval        1957 Eng won
> 4.7 Laker           (Eng) 19/90  v Aus Manchester      1956 Eng won
> 4.9 Woolley         (Eng) 10/49  v Eng The Oval        1912 Eng won


 
 
 
Top

Miserly 10 wicket hauls

Post by Mike Holman » Sun, 26 Nov 2000 04:00:00



Quote:
>Here are all the instances when a bowler has taken 10 or more wickets in a match
>at less than 5 runs/wkt:

>1.9 Briggs          (Eng) 15/28  v Eng Cape Town       1889 Eng won
>2.2 Ironmonger      (Aus) 11/24  v RSA Melbourne       1932 Aus won
>2.7 McGrath         (Aus) 10/27  v WI  Brisbane        2000 Aus won
>2.8 Toshack         (Aus) 11/31  v Ind Brisbane        1947 Aus won
>3.0 Lohmann         (Eng) 15/45  v Eng Port Elizabeth  1896 Eng won
>4.2 Walsh           (WI ) 13/55  v WI  Wellington      1995 WI  won
>4.4 Barnes          (Eng) 13/57  v RSA The Oval        1912 Eng won
>4.4 Lock            (Eng) 11/48  v WI  The Oval        1957 Eng won
>4.7 Laker           (Eng) 19/90  v Aus Manchester      1956 Eng won
>4.9 Woolley         (Eng) 10/49  v Eng The Oval        1912 Eng won

This doesn't look entirely right.

It would be interesting to know, for instance, why England were playing
a Test match against England, which England won, in 1912 at The Oval.

Cheers,

Mike
--
1969 - most recent previous England series win over WI
1966 - most recent previous England innings victory over WI
1957 - most recent previous series v WI in which England won three matches
Will the same lengths of time have to pass before these things recur?

 
 
 
Top

Miserly 10 wicket hauls

Post by Mad Hami » Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:58:17

On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 13:11:19 +0000, Mike Holmans

Quote:



>>Here are all the instances when a bowler has taken 10 or more wickets in a match
>>at less than 5 runs/wkt:

>>1.9 Briggs          (Eng) 15/28  v Eng Cape Town       1889 Eng won
>>2.2 Ironmonger      (Aus) 11/24  v RSA Melbourne       1932 Aus won
>>2.7 McGrath         (Aus) 10/27  v WI  Brisbane        2000 Aus won
>>2.8 Toshack         (Aus) 11/31  v Ind Brisbane        1947 Aus won
>>3.0 Lohmann         (Eng) 15/45  v Eng Port Elizabeth  1896 Eng won
>>4.2 Walsh           (WI ) 13/55  v WI  Wellington      1995 WI  won
>>4.4 Barnes          (Eng) 13/57  v RSA The Oval        1912 Eng won
>>4.4 Lock            (Eng) 11/48  v WI  The Oval        1957 Eng won
>>4.7 Laker           (Eng) 19/90  v Aus Manchester      1956 Eng won
>>4.9 Woolley         (Eng) 10/49  v Eng The Oval        1912 Eng won

>This doesn't look entirely right.

>It would be interesting to know, for instance, why England were playing
>a Test match against England, which England won, in 1912 at The Oval.

because they figured it'd be better competition than the Australians
minus the big 6 or South Africa?
 
 
 
Top

Miserly 10 wicket hauls

Post by Ro » Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:43:46


says...

Quote:



>>Here are all the instances when a bowler has taken 10 or more wickets in a
match
>>at less than 5 runs/wkt:

>>1.9 Briggs          (Eng) 15/28  v Eng Cape Town       1889 Eng won
>>2.2 Ironmonger      (Aus) 11/24  v RSA Melbourne       1932 Aus won
>>2.7 McGrath         (Aus) 10/27  v WI  Brisbane        2000 Aus won
>>2.8 Toshack         (Aus) 11/31  v Ind Brisbane        1947 Aus won
>>3.0 Lohmann         (Eng) 15/45  v Eng Port Elizabeth  1896 Eng won
>>4.2 Walsh           (WI ) 13/55  v WI  Wellington      1995 WI  won
>>4.4 Barnes          (Eng) 13/57  v RSA The Oval        1912 Eng won
>>4.4 Lock            (Eng) 11/48  v WI  The Oval        1957 Eng won
>>4.7 Laker           (Eng) 19/90  v Aus Manchester      1956 Eng won
>>4.9 Woolley         (Eng) 10/49  v Eng The Oval        1912 Eng won

>This doesn't look entirely right.

>It would be interesting to know, for instance, why England were playing
>a Test match against England, which England won, in 1912 at The Oval.

Along with that England V England match in 1889, which for some reason was
played in Cape Town. It was obviously successful, as it was followed by a
similar exercise in Port Elizabeth in 1896.  But i'm told that wasn't as good a
match as that thriller in Wellington in 1995, where the might of the West
Indies took on the might of the West Indies. I'm told that in that game, Walsh
was c & b by himself, a first in tests.
;-)

--
Dockers for Premiers 2001.

ICQ #39678890

 
 
 
Top

Miserly 10 wicket hauls

Post by Mac Attac » Mon, 27 Nov 2000 04:00:00

Quote:

> Here are all the instances when a bowler has taken 10 or more wickets in a match
> at less than 5 runs/wkt:

> 1.9 Briggs          (Eng) 15/28  v Eng Cape Town       1889 Eng won
> 3.0 Lohmann         (Eng) 15/45  v Eng Port Elizabeth  1896 Eng won
> 4.2 Walsh           (WI ) 13/55  v WI  Wellington      1995 WI  won
> 4.9 Woolley         (Eng) 10/49  v Eng The Oval        1912 Eng won

Why were they bowling at their own team? So we're counting new sessions now, are we?
 
 
 
Top

Miserly 10 wicket hauls

Post by AL » Mon, 27 Nov 2000 04:00:00


Quote:



> >Here are all the instances when a bowler has taken 10 or more wickets
in a match
> >at less than 5 runs/wkt:

> >1.9 Briggs          (Eng) 15/28  v Eng Cape Town       1889 Eng won
> >2.2 Ironmonger      (Aus) 11/24  v RSA Melbourne       1932 Aus won
> >2.7 McGrath         (Aus) 10/27  v WI  Brisbane        2000 Aus won
> >2.8 Toshack         (Aus) 11/31  v Ind Brisbane        1947 Aus won
> >3.0 Lohmann         (Eng) 15/45  v Eng Port Elizabeth  1896 Eng won
> >4.2 Walsh           (WI ) 13/55  v WI  Wellington      1995 WI  won
> >4.4 Barnes          (Eng) 13/57  v RSA The Oval        1912 Eng won
> >4.4 Lock            (Eng) 11/48  v WI  The Oval        1957 Eng won
> >4.7 Laker           (Eng) 19/90  v Aus Manchester      1956 Eng won
> >4.9 Woolley         (Eng) 10/49  v Eng The Oval        1912 Eng won

> This doesn't look entirely right.

> It would be interesting to know, for instance, why England were playing
> a Test match against England, which England won, in 1912 at The Oval.

And indeed against themselves in Cape Town....

...and Port Elizabeth.

No wonder there are so many English instances in!!!

--
A.L.S.
----------------------------------

 
 
 
Top

Miserly 10 wicket hauls

Post by Mohan Da » Tue, 28 Nov 2000 04:00:00

Quote:



> >Here are all the instances when a bowler has taken 10 or more wickets in a match
> >at less than 5 runs/wkt:

> >1.9 Briggs          (Eng) 15/28  v Eng Cape Town       1889 Eng won
> >3.0 Lohmann         (Eng) 15/45  v Eng Port Elizabeth  1896 Eng won
> >4.2 Walsh           (WI ) 13/55  v WI  Wellington      1995 WI  won
> >4.9 Woolley         (Eng) 10/49  v Eng The Oval        1912 Eng won

> This doesn't look entirely right.

Those should be v RSA, RSA, NZ and Aus respectively.

Cheers,
Mohan

 
 
 
Top

1. Indian first class 10 wicket hauls

2. Multiple 10 wkt hauls in a series

3. Who has the most 5 wicket innings and 10 wicket matches?

4. All 10 wickets caught in slips+wicket keeper (and may be gully)

5. Waugh; 100 and a 5 wicket haul

6. Most expensive 5-wicket haul in a Test innings

7. Murali eyes 50 five-wicket hauls

8. Hayden's 2 wicket haul

9. Congratulations to Lyon for his 5 wicket haul.

10. Large Wicket Hauls

11. kapil's 9 wicket haul

12. Namesakes and three-wicket hauls

All times are UTC
Board index