Quote:
> You sure as hell don't get 10 wickets in a Test match (let alone 16)
> by sheer good luck. You most definitely have to bowl well. You're
> pitted against the best another nation has to offer, and unless you
> bowl well, there is no way you can be *that* successful. One of the
> closest things I've seen to being a fluke was Phil Tufnell's 7 wickets
> vs the West Indians in '91. He was almost served them up on a silver
> platter. But even that was far from being a fluky performance. Hell
> the English donated Shane Warne a significant proportion of his 20
> wickets in the first two recent Ashes Tests - doesn't take credit away
> from him for getting them.
> Cheers,
> Rohan
The Tufnell haul mentioned above was quite extraordinary, it was the 5th test
at the Oval 1991 and he had first innings figures of 14.3-3-25-6 (and second
innings figures of 46-6-150-1 !), he took the wickets in 33 balls. Lambert
miscued to cover, Marshall edged a cut to slip, Richards, Ambrose and Walsh
were out in one over to 'agricultural' shots and finally Paterson edged to
slip. There was no real reason for this rash of ***, WI were trying to
save the follow on !, although the ball was spinning a bit, it certainly
wasn't unplayable.
--
Traviss