Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by CiL » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:35:30


And they are at it again..!

+++++++++++
..I don't agree with the punishment he got," Ranatunga said. "It
should be permanent. If you take ***, you should be banned for life.
That goes for all players, not just him.

"That's my personal opinion. The message should be strong so *** are
out of sports. There has to be a permanent rule for the future.

From
http://SportToday.org/

+++++++

CiL
++++ Rohit Brijnath +++++++
..His faults have been of carelessness, and his belief that turning a
leather ball beautifully makes him unaccountable is a sin favoured by
elite sportsmen. They all say the game is bigger than them but their
actions often are to the contrary. But he was severely punished for
his pill swallowing, and he has done his time and no man should be
hounded by his past forever.

Australia needs Warne, and so does cricket, for no game has enough of
character and colour. He is that oddest of men, both hero and
anti-hero, both knight and villain, his foibles a delight for tabloid
headline writers yet his art so delicate and brutal that Wisden
anointed him one of its five cricketers of the last century. Few men
affect us so.

Cricket has tired of Warne's indiscretions but it is bellowing in
delight at the thought of his fine skills. The game has swung too
heavily towards batsmen, and too few bowlers have demanded our
attention. Spin itself has seen better days, for Harbhajan is
struggling, Muralitharan is constantly, and often unfairly, vilified,
and the stage is crying out for another performance from this blond
actor.

Shane Warne cannot afford to fluff his lines.

At http://SportToday.org/

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Shripathi Kamat » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:19:48


Quote:

> And they are at it again..!

> +++++++++++
> ..I don't agree with the punishment he got," Ranatunga said. "It
> should be permanent. If you take ***, you should be banned for life.
> That goes for all players, not just him.

> "That's my personal opinion. The message should be strong so *** are
> out of sports. There has to be a permanent rule for the future.

That's a sure sign that drug-testing will become mandatory in SL for its
cricketers.

Yup, I am sure that this will happen soon, since Ranatunga is now a in a
position to mandate it.

Any minute now...

<fx: face beginning to turn blue>

<snip>

--
Shripathi Kamath

Never liked temporary rules on drug-testing anyway.  As they say: "*** are
temporary but rules must be permanent"

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Ananda Wijepal » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 05:29:14


Quote:

> And they are at it again..!

> +++++++++++
> ..I don't agree with the punishment he got," Ranatunga said. "It
> should be permanent. If you take ***, you should be banned for life.
> That goes for all players, not just him.

> "That's my personal opinion. The message should be strong so *** are
> out of sports. There has to be a permanent rule for the future.

> From
> http://SportToday.org/

> +++++++

<snip>

The ongoing verbal stunt between Ranathunga and Warne, is a personal one.
Maybe Warne started it before 99 WC, but Ranathunga has contributed to it
since then. This has been blown up tabloids for the sale of their
newspapers.

Ranathunga has used this battle to boost his political image - Warne to the
reasons known only to him.

This type of cheap verbal stunts between cricketers are not in the interest
of the game.

If they can keep this personal feud to private correspondence it will be
better for the game.

Ananda

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by RodP » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 05:55:11



Quote:
> This type of cheap verbal stunts between cricketers are not in the interest
> of the game.

Some may disagree. Verbal jousting between teams tends to raise
interests and passion about the upcoming series. Just like the
post the other day for the clown suggesting the SL team bend over,
it's so much sweeter when your team gets up and you can
metaphorically plant your boot up his date.

It most likely doesn't affect the outcome of the match one tiny
bit, but it can rally the support of the fans, and that can't be
a bad thing.

Cheers,
Rod.

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Ananda Wijepal » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 06:12:20


Quote:


> > This type of cheap verbal stunts between cricketers are not in the
interest
> > of the game.

> Some may disagree. Verbal jousting between teams tends to raise
> interests and passion about the upcoming series. Just like the
> post the other day for the clown suggesting the SL team bend over,
> it's so much sweeter when your team gets up and you can
> metaphorically plant your boot up his date.

> It most likely doesn't affect the outcome of the match one tiny
> bit, but it can rally the support of the fans, and that can't be
> a bad thing.

Actually this is not verbal jousting between two teams. This is a verbal
stunt between a past cricketer and his enemy. It has gone on to the extent
of their eating habits etc.

Ranathunga is campaigning for the general election in SL which is going to
be held on 2 April, and he is using this verbal stunt to boost his political
image.

Ananda

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Shatada » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 06:15:07


--->8---

Quote:
> Ranathunga is campaigning for the general election in SL which is going to
> be held on 2 April, and he is using this verbal stunt to boost his
political
> image.

Given that Ranatunga led SL to its only world cup victory and that under his
tutelage SL came of age, what is his image in SL (esp wrt his political
ambitions)?
Quote:

> Ananda

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Colin Kynoc » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 06:20:16



Quote:

>And they are at it again..!

>+++++++++++
>..I don't agree with the punishment he got," Ranatunga said. "It
>should be permanent. If you take ***, you should be banned for life.
>That goes for all players, not just him.

>"That's my personal opinion. The message should be strong so *** are
>out of sports. There has to be a permanent rule for the future.

And what message do the Sri Lankan players get from their board?

They don't have a drug policy and they don't test their players.

I suggest Ranatunga makes sure his own backyard is clean and tidy
before commenting on others,

Colin Kynoch

<snip>

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by The Wo » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 07:23:09


Quote:



> > And they are at it again..!

> > +++++++++++
> > ..I don't agree with the punishment he got," Ranatunga said. "It
> > should be permanent. If you take ***, you should be banned for life.
> > That goes for all players, not just him.

> > "That's my personal opinion. The message should be strong so *** are
> > out of sports. There has to be a permanent rule for the future.

> > From
> > http://SportToday.org/

> > +++++++
> <snip>

> The ongoing verbal stunt between Ranathunga and Warne, is a personal one.
> Maybe Warne started it before 99 WC, but Ranathunga has contributed to it
> since then. This has been blown up tabloids for the sale of their
> newspapers.

> Ranathunga has used this battle to boost his political image - Warne to
the
> reasons known only to him.

> This type of cheap verbal stunts between cricketers are not in the
interest
> of the game.

> If they can keep this personal feud to private correspondence it will be
> better for the game.

Any publicity is good publicity. Worn knows it too. They're both playing it
for all it's worth because they both need it. Worn hasn't got too many years
left to rebuild his media profile, and Runnertunga needs to sell tickets.
 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by dambul » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:40:04

Quote:


>>And they are at it again..!

>>+++++++++++
>>..I don't agree with the punishment he got," Ranatunga said. "It
>>should be permanent. If you take ***, you should be banned for life.
>>That goes for all players, not just him.

>>"That's my personal opinion. The message should be strong so *** are
>>out of sports. There has to be a permanent rule for the future.

Ranatunga is trying togain more visibility (and more votes) with
the publicty he gets. Warne should keep his mouth shut.
Because R may be trying to mentally upset Warne.
R has nothing to lose.

D

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Colin Kynoc » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 09:22:49

Quote:



>>>And they are at it again..!

>>>+++++++++++
>>>..I don't agree with the punishment he got," Ranatunga said. "It
>>>should be permanent. If you take ***, you should be banned for life.
>>>That goes for all players, not just him.

>>>"That's my personal opinion. The message should be strong so *** are
>>>out of sports. There has to be a permanent rule for the future.

>Ranatunga is trying togain more visibility (and more votes) with
>the publicty he gets. Warne should keep his mouth shut.
>Because R may be trying to mentally upset Warne.
>R has nothing to lose.

Except maybe a few kilos

Colin Kynoch

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Bob Dube » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:56:34

Quote:

> And what message do the Sri Lankan players get from their board?

> They don't have a drug policy and they don't test their players.

> I suggest Ranatunga makes sure his own backyard is clean and tidy
> before commenting on others,

They don't, but that doesn't invalidate Ranatungan's opinion.

However Sri Lankan players would have been exposed to the same
anti-doping policy as any other country's players during the 2003 CWC.
I didn't note them getting nervous about having to take drug tests.

Cricket did all that can reasonably be expected in terms of drug
testing during the 2003 CWC, and the game came up clean.

On a slightly different tack, how many countries DO have a doping
policy that involves testing?

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Shatada » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:05:40



Quote:

> > And what message do the Sri Lankan players get from their board?

> > They don't have a drug policy and they don't test their players.

> > I suggest Ranatunga makes sure his own backyard is clean and tidy
> > before commenting on others,

> They don't, but that doesn't invalidate Ranatungan's opinion.

> However Sri Lankan players would have been exposed to the same
> anti-doping policy as any other country's players during the 2003 CWC.
> I didn't note them getting nervous about having to take drug tests.

> Cricket did all that can reasonably be expected in terms of drug
> testing during the 2003 CWC, and the game came up clean.

> On a slightly different tack, how many countries DO have a doping
> policy that involves testing?

AFAIK only Aus.
 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Colin Kynoc » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:27:28



Quote:

>> And what message do the Sri Lankan players get from their board?

>> They don't have a drug policy and they don't test their players.

>> I suggest Ranatunga makes sure his own backyard is clean and tidy
>> before commenting on others,

>They don't, but that doesn't invalidate Ranatungan's opinion.

>However Sri Lankan players would have been exposed to the same
>anti-doping policy as any other country's players during the 2003 CWC.
>I didn't note them getting nervous about having to take drug tests.

With less than half the players tested.

Interestingly it was the Indian players who were arcing up.

Quote:
>Cricket did all that can reasonably be expected in terms of drug
>testing during the 2003 CWC, and the game came up clean.

It could have tested all the players instead of less than half of
them.

Quote:
>On a slightly different tack, how many countries DO have a doping
>policy that involves testing?

I know Australia isn't alone.

I think there is four or five now.

Colin Kynoch

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Andrew M » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:17:32


Quote:



>>On a slightly different tack, how many countries DO have a doping
>>policy that involves testing?

>I know Australia isn't alone.

>I think there is four or five now.

At least Australia, NZ, England, Wales and South Africa, according to these two
articles:

http://www.bdtzone.com/news_details.asp?ID=52
http://www.rediff.com/worldcup99/news/2202drug.htm

 
 
 

Ranatunga says Warne shud hav been banned for Life!

Post by Andrew M » Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:09:25


Quote:

>However Sri Lankan players would have been exposed to the same
>anti-doping policy as any other country's players during the 2003 CWC.
>I didn't note them getting nervous about having to take drug tests.

>Cricket did all that can reasonably be expected in terms of drug
>testing during the 2003 CWC, and the game came up clean.

What was the drug testing procedure during the CWC? Did they inform the
countries/players that they would be testing during this time or did they just
spring it on them? Unless testing is randomly carried out throughout the season,
the testing done at the CWC is merely a token attempt at making the game look
squeaky clean. It really doesn't prove anything if the tests can be anticipated.
Anything short of ICC sanctioned independent testing of all Test and One day
playing nations at random times throughout the year is fairly meaningless. I
agree with Ranatunga (a complete first, I must say) regarding lifetime bans, but
it really sounds quite hollow when his own country has no drug detection
procedures in place. Heck, I doubt Warne would have even been detected had the
ACB relied simply on the testing done at the CWC, although I don't know if his
mum was planning on going over there for the tournament ;).