Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action

Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action

Post by Larry de Silv » Sun, 17 Feb 2002 10:21:35


Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action
By Rishva Weliwita on Feb 2002

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Hello All;

It is very baffling to hear that Mr. Bishen Bedi waited this long (since
1995) to express his opinion about the great off spinner, Muttiah
Muralitharan's action. Therefore, in my view, it is definitely due to either
both, or one of the following two reasons, why Mr. Bedi, suddenly, decided
to abuse Muralitharan's action, after 6+ years of staying in silence.

(1) Muralitharan is currently taking test wickets at a speed that no other
spinner had done before, thus would reach the highest point in no time, if
he is allowed to play test cricket.
Had Murali taken say, for instance, fewer than 200 wickets, so far, thus
turned out to be an unsuccessful bowler, then we definitely wouldn't have
heard these harsh remarks from Mr. Bedi.

Although, I hate to mention the second possible reason, in my view, it could
very well be TRUE as well;
(2) Since, all most all Murali's critics, in the past, had come from
non-Asian countries (mostly from Australia), thus someone from Australia,
who cannot stand Murali's success any longer, would have paid substantial
amount of money for Mr. Bedi, to get him to abuse Murali's action.
Hence, Murali's antagonists may now use Mr. Bedi's comments as a weapon, and
could prove that not only non-Asians, but also great past cricketers from
Asian countries, such as Mr. Bedi himself, could also find Murali's action
illegal.

I must also say, Mr. Bedi must be very ignorant of modern medical
techniques, in order to contradict the medical evidence that proves the
legality of Murali's bowling action; while some fast bowlers, in recent
times, were cleared only by the medical tests done at
the University of Western Australia or in some cases by no medical evidence
at all, Muralitharan's action was cleared by two separate and unrelated
tests. That is, none other than by the University of Western Australia
itself, and also by a professor at Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology.

The analogy Mr. Bedi used to abuse Murali's action, itself, is llogical.
Because, having an eye sight is a must for a person to fly an aircraft (I
mean with currently available technology, a blind cannot fly), just as
having an arm is a must for a person to bowl. But, Murali has that arm,
therefore he should be allowed to bowl as long as his action is not illegal.

Therefore, I think, Mr. Bedi's recent comments on Murali's bowling action,
is nothing but a well orchestrated ***, to stop Murali from playing
test cricket anymore. Thus, deprive him from achieving the highest wicket
taking milestone!
Having said that, I would be surprised, if nobody else from Asia decided to
follow Mr. Bedi's comments.

If a person is evil, he/she would not want to accept the truth, no matter
how hard you try to convince his/her, or how hard you try to prove your
point.
Unfortunately, the good have no choice, but to share this world with people
of evil, thus live among them. Though, in many cases, I have realized the so
called "force of evil" somehow manages to raise its head and destroys the
TRUTH. It is because, this world of humanity is poisoned with jealousy,
hatred, destruction, corruption and with many other imm***acts and
feelings. It is tragic, isn't it?

 
 
 

Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action

Post by Bob the banke » Mon, 18 Feb 2002 02:27:03

Larry,

If Murali took up darts he would be world champ in "no time" as well - he's
got the perfect action for it.

Bob



Quote:

> Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action
> By Rishva Weliwita on Feb 2002

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> Hello All;

> It is very baffling to hear that Mr. Bishen Bedi waited this long (since
> 1995) to express his opinion about the great off spinner, Muttiah
> Muralitharan's action. Therefore, in my view, it is definitely due to
either
> both, or one of the following two reasons, why Mr. Bedi, suddenly, decided
> to abuse Muralitharan's action, after 6+ years of staying in silence.

> (1) Muralitharan is currently taking test wickets at a speed that no other
> spinner had done before, thus would reach the highest point in no time, if
> he is allowed to play test cricket.
> Had Murali taken say, for instance, fewer than 200 wickets, so far, thus
> turned out to be an unsuccessful bowler, then we definitely wouldn't have
> heard these harsh remarks from Mr. Bedi.

> Although, I hate to mention the second possible reason, in my view, it
could
> very well be TRUE as well;
> (2) Since, all most all Murali's critics, in the past, had come from
> non-Asian countries (mostly from Australia), thus someone from Australia,
> who cannot stand Murali's success any longer, would have paid substantial
> amount of money for Mr. Bedi, to get him to abuse Murali's action.
> Hence, Murali's antagonists may now use Mr. Bedi's comments as a weapon,
and
> could prove that not only non-Asians, but also great past cricketers from
> Asian countries, such as Mr. Bedi himself, could also find Murali's action
> illegal.

> I must also say, Mr. Bedi must be very ignorant of modern medical
> techniques, in order to contradict the medical evidence that proves the
> legality of Murali's bowling action; while some fast bowlers, in recent
> times, were cleared only by the medical tests done at
> the University of Western Australia or in some cases by no medical
evidence
> at all, Muralitharan's action was cleared by two separate and unrelated
> tests. That is, none other than by the University of Western Australia
> itself, and also by a professor at Hong Kong University of Science and
> Technology.

> The analogy Mr. Bedi used to abuse Murali's action, itself, is llogical.
> Because, having an eye sight is a must for a person to fly an aircraft (I
> mean with currently available technology, a blind cannot fly), just as
> having an arm is a must for a person to bowl. But, Murali has that arm,
> therefore he should be allowed to bowl as long as his action is not
illegal.

> Therefore, I think, Mr. Bedi's recent comments on Murali's bowling action,
> is nothing but a well orchestrated ***, to stop Murali from playing
> test cricket anymore. Thus, deprive him from achieving the highest wicket
> taking milestone!
> Having said that, I would be surprised, if nobody else from Asia decided
to
> follow Mr. Bedi's comments.

> If a person is evil, he/she would not want to accept the truth, no matter
> how hard you try to convince his/her, or how hard you try to prove your
> point.
> Unfortunately, the good have no choice, but to share this world with
people
> of evil, thus live among them. Though, in many cases, I have realized the
so
> called "force of evil" somehow manages to raise its head and destroys the
> TRUTH. It is because, this world of humanity is poisoned with jealousy,
> hatred, destruction, corruption and with many other imm***acts and
> feelings. It is tragic, isn't it?


 
 
 

Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action

Post by Larry de Silv » Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:28:29



Quote:
> Larry,

> If Murali took up darts he would be world champ in "no time" as well -
he's
> got the perfect action for it.

And if you took up BOBsleigh, you would be a runaway success in snow
time............................................!!!!!!!

Larrikin

Quote:

> Bob



> > Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action
> > By Rishva Weliwita on Feb 2002

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ----
> > Hello All;

> > It is very baffling to hear that Mr. Bishen Bedi waited this long (since
> > 1995) to express his opinion about the great off spinner, Muttiah
> > Muralitharan's action. Therefore, in my view, it is definitely due to
> either
> > both, or one of the following two reasons, why Mr. Bedi, suddenly,
decided
> > to abuse Muralitharan's action, after 6+ years of staying in silence.

> > (1) Muralitharan is currently taking test wickets at a speed that no
other
> > spinner had done before, thus would reach the highest point in no time,
if
> > he is allowed to play test cricket.
> > Had Murali taken say, for instance, fewer than 200 wickets, so far, thus
> > turned out to be an unsuccessful bowler, then we definitely wouldn't
have
> > heard these harsh remarks from Mr. Bedi.

> > Although, I hate to mention the second possible reason, in my view, it
> could
> > very well be TRUE as well;
> > (2) Since, all most all Murali's critics, in the past, had come from
> > non-Asian countries (mostly from Australia), thus someone from
Australia,
> > who cannot stand Murali's success any longer, would have paid
substantial
> > amount of money for Mr. Bedi, to get him to abuse Murali's action.
> > Hence, Murali's antagonists may now use Mr. Bedi's comments as a weapon,
> and
> > could prove that not only non-Asians, but also great past cricketers
from
> > Asian countries, such as Mr. Bedi himself, could also find Murali's
action
> > illegal.

> > I must also say, Mr. Bedi must be very ignorant of modern medical
> > techniques, in order to contradict the medical evidence that proves the
> > legality of Murali's bowling action; while some fast bowlers, in recent
> > times, were cleared only by the medical tests done at
> > the University of Western Australia or in some cases by no medical
> evidence
> > at all, Muralitharan's action was cleared by two separate and unrelated
> > tests. That is, none other than by the University of Western Australia
> > itself, and also by a professor at Hong Kong University of Science and
> > Technology.

> > The analogy Mr. Bedi used to abuse Murali's action, itself, is llogical.
> > Because, having an eye sight is a must for a person to fly an aircraft
(I
> > mean with currently available technology, a blind cannot fly), just as
> > having an arm is a must for a person to bowl. But, Murali has that arm,
> > therefore he should be allowed to bowl as long as his action is not
> illegal.

> > Therefore, I think, Mr. Bedi's recent comments on Murali's bowling
action,
> > is nothing but a well orchestrated ***, to stop Murali from
playing
> > test cricket anymore. Thus, deprive him from achieving the highest
wicket
> > taking milestone!
> > Having said that, I would be surprised, if nobody else from Asia decided
> to
> > follow Mr. Bedi's comments.

> > If a person is evil, he/she would not want to accept the truth, no
matter
> > how hard you try to convince his/her, or how hard you try to prove your
> > point.
> > Unfortunately, the good have no choice, but to share this world with
> people
> > of evil, thus live among them. Though, in many cases, I have realized
the
> so
> > called "force of evil" somehow manages to raise its head and destroys
the
> > TRUTH. It is because, this world of humanity is poisoned with jealousy,
> > hatred, destruction, corruption and with many other imm***acts and
> > feelings. It is tragic, isn't it?


 
 
 

Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action

Post by Bob the banke » Tue, 19 Feb 2002 01:27:06

Especially with the Chucker as my starting man :)



Quote:



> > Larry,

> > If Murali took up darts he would be world champ in "no time" as well -
> he's
> > got the perfect action for it.

> And if you took up BOBsleigh, you would be a runaway success in snow
> time............................................!!!!!!!

> Larrikin

> > Bob



> > > Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action
> > > By Rishva Weliwita on Feb 2002

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > > ----
> > > Hello All;

> > > It is very baffling to hear that Mr. Bishen Bedi waited this long
(since
> > > 1995) to express his opinion about the great off spinner, Muttiah
> > > Muralitharan's action. Therefore, in my view, it is definitely due to
> > either
> > > both, or one of the following two reasons, why Mr. Bedi, suddenly,
> decided
> > > to abuse Muralitharan's action, after 6+ years of staying in silence.

> > > (1) Muralitharan is currently taking test wickets at a speed that no
> other
> > > spinner had done before, thus would reach the highest point in no
time,
> if
> > > he is allowed to play test cricket.
> > > Had Murali taken say, for instance, fewer than 200 wickets, so far,
thus
> > > turned out to be an unsuccessful bowler, then we definitely wouldn't
> have
> > > heard these harsh remarks from Mr. Bedi.

> > > Although, I hate to mention the second possible reason, in my view, it
> > could
> > > very well be TRUE as well;
> > > (2) Since, all most all Murali's critics, in the past, had come from
> > > non-Asian countries (mostly from Australia), thus someone from
> Australia,
> > > who cannot stand Murali's success any longer, would have paid
> substantial
> > > amount of money for Mr. Bedi, to get him to abuse Murali's action.
> > > Hence, Murali's antagonists may now use Mr. Bedi's comments as a
weapon,
> > and
> > > could prove that not only non-Asians, but also great past cricketers
> from
> > > Asian countries, such as Mr. Bedi himself, could also find Murali's
> action
> > > illegal.

> > > I must also say, Mr. Bedi must be very ignorant of modern medical
> > > techniques, in order to contradict the medical evidence that proves
the
> > > legality of Murali's bowling action; while some fast bowlers, in
recent
> > > times, were cleared only by the medical tests done at
> > > the University of Western Australia or in some cases by no medical
> > evidence
> > > at all, Muralitharan's action was cleared by two separate and
unrelated
> > > tests. That is, none other than by the University of Western Australia
> > > itself, and also by a professor at Hong Kong University of Science and
> > > Technology.

> > > The analogy Mr. Bedi used to abuse Murali's action, itself, is
llogical.
> > > Because, having an eye sight is a must for a person to fly an aircraft
> (I
> > > mean with currently available technology, a blind cannot fly), just as
> > > having an arm is a must for a person to bowl. But, Murali has that
arm,
> > > therefore he should be allowed to bowl as long as his action is not
> > illegal.

> > > Therefore, I think, Mr. Bedi's recent comments on Murali's bowling
> action,
> > > is nothing but a well orchestrated ***, to stop Murali from
> playing
> > > test cricket anymore. Thus, deprive him from achieving the highest
> wicket
> > > taking milestone!
> > > Having said that, I would be surprised, if nobody else from Asia
decided
> > to
> > > follow Mr. Bedi's comments.

> > > If a person is evil, he/she would not want to accept the truth, no
> matter
> > > how hard you try to convince his/her, or how hard you try to prove
your
> > > point.
> > > Unfortunately, the good have no choice, but to share this world with
> > people
> > > of evil, thus live among them. Though, in many cases, I have realized
> the
> > so
> > > called "force of evil" somehow manages to raise its head and destroys
> the
> > > TRUTH. It is because, this world of humanity is poisoned with
jealousy,
> > > hatred, destruction, corruption and with many other imm***acts and
> > > feelings. It is tragic, isn't it?

 
 
 

Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action

Post by Larry de Silv » Tue, 19 Feb 2002 07:48:36



Quote:
> Especially with the Chucker as my starting man :)

He should be your (off) BREAK
man............................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Larrikin

Quote:





> > > Larry,

> > > If Murali took up darts he would be world champ in "no time" as well -
> > he's
> > > got the perfect action for it.

> > And if you took up BOBsleigh, you would be a runaway success in snow
> > time............................................!!!!!!!

> > Larrikin

> > > Bob



> > > > Bishen Bedi's comments VS Murali's action
> > > > By Rishva Weliwita on Feb 2002

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > > ----
> > > > Hello All;

> > > > It is very baffling to hear that Mr. Bishen Bedi waited this long
> (since
> > > > 1995) to express his opinion about the great off spinner, Muttiah
> > > > Muralitharan's action. Therefore, in my view, it is definitely due
to
> > > either
> > > > both, or one of the following two reasons, why Mr. Bedi, suddenly,
> > decided
> > > > to abuse Muralitharan's action, after 6+ years of staying in
silence.

> > > > (1) Muralitharan is currently taking test wickets at a speed that no
> > other
> > > > spinner had done before, thus would reach the highest point in no
> time,
> > if
> > > > he is allowed to play test cricket.
> > > > Had Murali taken say, for instance, fewer than 200 wickets, so far,
> thus
> > > > turned out to be an unsuccessful bowler, then we definitely wouldn't
> > have
> > > > heard these harsh remarks from Mr. Bedi.

> > > > Although, I hate to mention the second possible reason, in my view,
it
> > > could
> > > > very well be TRUE as well;
> > > > (2) Since, all most all Murali's critics, in the past, had come from
> > > > non-Asian countries (mostly from Australia), thus someone from
> > Australia,
> > > > who cannot stand Murali's success any longer, would have paid
> > substantial
> > > > amount of money for Mr. Bedi, to get him to abuse Murali's action.
> > > > Hence, Murali's antagonists may now use Mr. Bedi's comments as a
> weapon,
> > > and
> > > > could prove that not only non-Asians, but also great past cricketers
> > from
> > > > Asian countries, such as Mr. Bedi himself, could also find Murali's
> > action
> > > > illegal.

> > > > I must also say, Mr. Bedi must be very ignorant of modern medical
> > > > techniques, in order to contradict the medical evidence that proves
> the
> > > > legality of Murali's bowling action; while some fast bowlers, in
> recent
> > > > times, were cleared only by the medical tests done at
> > > > the University of Western Australia or in some cases by no medical
> > > evidence
> > > > at all, Muralitharan's action was cleared by two separate and
> unrelated
> > > > tests. That is, none other than by the University of Western
Australia
> > > > itself, and also by a professor at Hong Kong University of Science
and
> > > > Technology.

> > > > The analogy Mr. Bedi used to abuse Murali's action, itself, is
> llogical.
> > > > Because, having an eye sight is a must for a person to fly an
aircraft
> > (I
> > > > mean with currently available technology, a blind cannot fly), just
as
> > > > having an arm is a must for a person to bowl. But, Murali has that
> arm,
> > > > therefore he should be allowed to bowl as long as his action is not
> > > illegal.

> > > > Therefore, I think, Mr. Bedi's recent comments on Murali's bowling
> > action,
> > > > is nothing but a well orchestrated ***, to stop Murali from
> > playing
> > > > test cricket anymore. Thus, deprive him from achieving the highest
> > wicket
> > > > taking milestone!
> > > > Having said that, I would be surprised, if nobody else from Asia
> decided
> > > to
> > > > follow Mr. Bedi's comments.

> > > > If a person is evil, he/she would not want to accept the truth, no
> > matter
> > > > how hard you try to convince his/her, or how hard you try to prove
> your
> > > > point.
> > > > Unfortunately, the good have no choice, but to share this world with
> > > people
> > > > of evil, thus live among them. Though, in many cases, I have
realized
> > the
> > > so
> > > > called "force of evil" somehow manages to raise its head and
destroys
> > the
> > > > TRUTH. It is because, this world of humanity is poisoned with
> jealousy,
> > > > hatred, destruction, corruption and with many other imm***acts and
> > > > feelings. It is tragic, isn't it?