Military waste under fire - Military waste under fire

Military waste under fire - Military waste under fire

Post by NSA TORTURE TECHNOLOGY, NEWS and RESEARC » Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:36:38

Military waste under fire - Military waste under fire

Tom Abate, Chronicle Staff Writer

Sunday, May 18, 2003

The Department of Defense, already infamous for spending $640 for a toilet
seat, once again finds itself under intense scrutiny, only this time because
it couldn't account for more than a trillion dollars in financial
transactions, not to mention dozens of tanks, missiles and planes.
The Pentagon's unenviable reputation for waste will top the congressional
agenda this week, when the House and Senate are expected to begin floor
debate on a Bush administration proposal to make sweeping changes in how the
Pentagon spends money, manages contracts and treats civilian employees.

The Bush proposal, called the Defense Transformation for the 21st Century
Act, arrives at a time when the nonpartisan General Accounting Office has
raised the volume of its perennial complaints about the financial woes at
Defense, which recently failed its seventh audit in as many years.

"Overhauling DOD's financial management operations represent a challenge
that goes far beyond financial accounting to the very fiber of (its) . . .
business operations and culture," GAO chief David Walker told lawmakers in


Though Defense has long been notorious for waste, recent government reports
suggest the Pentagon's money management woes have reached astronomical
proportions. A study by the Defense Department's inspector general found
that the Pentagon couldn't properly account for more than a trillion dollars
in monies spent. A GAO report found Defense inventory systems so lax that
the U.S.

Army lost track of 56 airplanes, 32 tanks, and 36 Javelin missile command

And before the Iraq war, when military leaders were scrambling to find
enough chemical and biological warfare suits to protect U.S. troops, the
department was caught selling these suits as surplus on the Internet "for
pennies on the dollar," a GAO official said.

Given these glaring gaps in the management of a Pentagon budget that is
approaching $400 billion, the coming debate is shaping up as a bid to gain
the high ground in the battle against waste, fraud and abuse.

"We are overhauling our financial management system precisely because people
like David Walker are rightly critical of it," said Dov Zakheim, the
Pentagon's chief financial officer and prime architect of the Defense
Department's self-styled fiscal transformation.

Among the provisions in the 207-page plan, the department is asking Congress
to allow Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to replace the civil service
system governing 700,000 nonmilitary employees with a new system to be
detailed later.

The plan would also eliminate or phase out more than a hundred reports that
now tell Congress, for instance, which Defense contractors support the Arab
boycott of Israel and when U.S. special forces train foreign soldiers, as
well as many studies of program costs.

The administration's proposal, which would also give Rumsfeld greater
authority to move money between accounts and exempt Defense from certain
environmental statutes, prompted influential House Democrats to write
Speaker Dennis Hastert last week complaining that the proposals would
"increase the level of waste, fraud, and abuse . . . by vastly reducing
(Defense) accountability."

"The Congress has increased defense spending from $300 billion to $400
billion over three years at the same time that the Pentagon has failed to
address financial problems that dwarf those of Enron," said Rep. Henry
Waxman, D-Los Angeles, one of the letter's signatories.

Saying critics of the bill "were arguing for more paperwork," Hastert
spokesman John Feehery said his boss would support the Bush reforms on the
House floor. "The purpose is to streamline the Pentagon to become a less
bureaucratic and more efficient organization . . . while also making it more
accountable," Feehery said.

The debate will center around the defense authorization bill, the policy-
setting prelude to the defense appropriations measure that comes up later in
the session. With the House and Senate considering different versions of the
transformation proposals, it will be months before each passes its own bill
and reconciles any differences.

But few on Capitol Hill would deny that, when it comes to fiscal management,

Defense is long overdue for "transformation."

In congressional testimony Rumsfeld himself has said "the financial
reporting systems of the Pentagon are in disarray . . . they're not capable
of providing the kinds of financial management information that any large
organization would have."

GAO reports detail not only the woeful state of Defense fiscal controls, but
the cost of failed attempts to fix them.

For instance, in June 2002 the GAO reviewed the history of a proposed
Corporate Information Management system, or CIM. The initiative began in
1989 as an attempt to unify more than 2,000 overlapping systems then being
used for billing, inventory, personnel and similar functions. But after
"spending about $20 billion, the CIM initiative was eventually abandoned,"
the GAO said.

Gregory Kutz, director of GAO's financial management division and co-author
of that report, likened Defense to a dysfunctional corporation, with the
Pentagon cast as a holding company exercising only weak fiscal control over
its subsidiaries -- the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. Today, DOD has
about 2,200 overlapping financial systems, Kutz said, and just running them
costs taxpayers $18 billion a year.

"The (Pentagon's) inability to even complete an audit shows just how far
they have to go," he said.

Kutz contrasted the department's loose inventory controls to state-of-the-
art systems at private corporations.

"I've been to Wal-Mart," Kutz said. "They were able to tell me how many
tubes of toothpaste were in Fairfax, Va., at that given moment. And DOD
can't find its chem-bio suits."

Danielle Brian, director of the Project on Governmental Oversight, a
nonprofit group in Washington, D.C., said waste has become ingrained in the
Defense budget because opposition to defense spending is portrayed as
unpatriotic, and legislators are often more concerned about winning Pentagon
pork than controlling defense waste.

"You have a black hole at the Pentagon for money and a blind Congress,"
Brian said.

But things may be changing.

GAO's Kutz said Rumsfeld has "showed a commitment" to cutting waste and
asked Pentagon officials to save 5 percent of the defense budget, which
would mean a $20 billion savings.

Legislators are also calling attention to Defense waste. "Balancing the
military's books is not as exciting as designing or purchasing the next
generation of airplanes, tanks, or ships, but it is just as important," Sen.
Robert Byrd, D-W.V., said last week. In a hearing last month about cost
overruns, Rep. John Duncan, R-Tenn., of the House Committee on Government
Reform said: "I've always considered myself to be a pro-military type
person, but that doesn't mean I just want to sit back and watch the Pentagon
waste billions and billions of dollars."

But while Capitol Hill sees the need, and possibly has the will to reform
the Pentagon, the devil remains in the details, and the administration
aroused Democratic suspicions when it dropped its 207-page transformation
bill on lawmakers on April 10 -- leaving scant time to scrutinize proposals
that touch many aspects of the biggest department in government.

"We have as much problem with the process as with the substance," said said
Rep. John Spratt, D-S.C., who co-signed Waxman's letter calling the
transformation bill "an effort by the Department to substantially reduce
congressional oversight and public accountability."

Defense's Zakheim counters that the reform proposals would "remove the
barnacles of past practices (and provide) DOD with modern day management
while preserving congressional oversight and prerogatives."

But Waxman, a critic of the administration's handling of Iraqi
reconstruction contracts, called the proposals "a military wish list" to
take advantage of "the wartime feeling."

"Secretary Rumsfeld is hoping to march through Congress like he marched
through Iraq," Waxman said.

        Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
                  >>>> at <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-