Sport Today

by **Call Centr** » Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:20:08

There were two appeals in that over. In the first appeal tendu was out
plumb lbw. The ball was missing off stump. It was missing leg stump.
However, it was hitting middle stump. The second appeal was a close
one but if a batsman gets the benefit of doubt on the second appeal it
is understandable. However, the first appeal was on a ball which was
hitting middle stump and tendu was out. The umpire must have been
daydreaming.

by **Viru** » Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:51:29

Quote:

> There were two appeals in that over. In the first appeal tendu was out
> plumb lbw. The ball was missing off stump. It was missing leg stump.
> However, it was hitting middle stump. The second appeal was a close
> one but if a batsman gets the benefit of doubt on the second appeal it
> is understandable. However, the first appeal was on a ball which was
> hitting middle stump and tendu was out. The umpire must have been
> daydreaming.

Hello Callu,
Thank you for never making a post like this when I escaped scores of
times due to the umpire.
Keep at it for Tendu - Hopefully, I can get a callback at #4 and then at #6
and then at #8 and finally as a pure spinner. And may be even after that a
horses for courses flat track specialist.

I didn't like your support of Dhawan but I can forgive you for it if you
keep at Tendu like this.

ViruS

by **Call Centr** » Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:51:33

Quote:

> > There were two appeals in that over. In the first appeal tendu was out
> > plumb lbw. The ball was missing off stump. It was missing leg stump.
> > However, it was hitting middle stump. The second appeal was a close
> > one but if a batsman gets the benefit of doubt on the second appeal it
> > is understandable. However, the first appeal was on a ball which was
> > hitting middle stump and tendu was out. The umpire must have been
> > daydreaming.

> Hello Callu,
> ? ?Thank you for never making a post like this when I escaped scores of
> times due to the umpire.
> Keep at it for Tendu - Hopefully, I can get a callback at #4 and then at #6
> and then at #8 and finally as a pure spinner. And may be even after that a
> horses for courses flat track specialist.

> I didn't like your support of Dhawan but I can forgive you for it if you
> keep at Tendu like this.

> ViruS

I don't prejudice against anyone. If Dhawan took Sehwag's place I
have no objection. I don't criticise players for the sake of
criticising. I also criticise players whom I like if I feel they are
not performing. The fact was that tendu was out.I am not targeting
tendu. Merely mentioning the truth.

Targeting Sehwag because you have a beef with me is like cutting off
your nose to spite your face. Amazing. :)

Please see the numerous, numerous times that tendu has benefitted from
umpiring. Much more than the poor decisions against him and compare
that with the almost non existent times Sehwag has benefitted. Not
too many times Sehwag has benefitted from umpiring mistakes. Even
after considering that tendu has played almost twice as many tests.
The benefits he has recieved are four or five times in umpiring
mistakes that Sehwag might have recieved. These are facts. I guess you
guys watch only what you want to watch. You watch players and matches
with blinkers on. I watch without prejudice and judge only what is the
truth. That is the problem and why you guys will always lose in
discussions and arguments and points with me. Change your perception
and stop being so biased.

Sport Today

Lyon to tendulkar. tendu was out, plumb lbw. Not given.

Lyon to tendulkar. tendu was out, plumb lbw. Not given.

Lyon to tendulkar. tendu was out, plumb lbw. Not given.

Lyon to tendulkar. tendu was out, plumb lbw. Not given.