Captain my Captain

Captain my Captain

Post by Glen Camarlingh » Mon, 18 Jan 1999 04:00:00


    Hasn't Shane Warne had an interesting start to his captaincy career for
Australia?  Not only has he lead his side to three wins out of four, they
have been three of the most thumping wins a captain could dream of.  Even
the game he lost was by a very small margin.

    Just maybe Shane Warne is the answer to Australia's future captaincy
problems - even though I have a hang up about bowlers being captain.  Four
games hardly makes a career.  But if we acknowledge a captain has most
influence in the field (captains can't really do a lot to make the team bat
better), in three out of four games he has kept his opposition to totals
well under 200.

    But as I said, it's VERY early days.

--
Glen Camarlinghi

White Rock
Queensland
Australia

 
 
 

Captain my Captain

Post by kdw » Mon, 18 Jan 1999 04:00:00


Quote:
>    Hasn't Shane Warne had an interesting start to his captaincy career for
>Australia?  Not only has he lead his side to three wins out of four, they
>have been three of the most thumping wins a captain could dream of.  Even
>the game he lost was by a very small margin.

>    Just maybe Shane Warne is the answer to Australia's future captaincy
>problems - even though I have a hang up about bowlers being captain.  Four
>games hardly makes a career.  But if we acknowledge a captain has most
>influence in the field (captains can't really do a lot to make the team bat
>better), in three out of four games he has kept his opposition to totals
>well under 200.

>    But as I said, it's VERY early days.

He's doing well, but the mark of a good captain is the amount of close games
he can pull off. The results so far don't show much about his captaincy.

For instance, how would you analyse Sri lanka 259 and Australia 2/260 in
Sydney when looking at Warne's captaincy of the side?

kdw

 
 
 

Captain my Captain

Post by Will Sutto » Mon, 18 Jan 1999 04:00:00

Quote:



>>    Hasn't Shane Warne had an interesting start to his captaincy career for
>>Australia?  Not only has he lead his side to three wins out of four, they
>>have been three of the most thumping wins a captain could dream of.  Even
>>the game he lost was by a very small margin.

>>    Just maybe Shane Warne is the answer to Australia's future captaincy
>>problems - even though I have a hang up about bowlers being captain.  Four
>>games hardly makes a career.  But if we acknowledge a captain has most
>>influence in the field (captains can't really do a lot to make the team bat
>>better), in three out of four games he has kept his opposition to totals
>>well under 200.

>>    But as I said, it's VERY early days.

>He's doing well, but the mark of a good captain is the amount of close games
>he can pull off. The results so far don't show much about his captaincy.

>For instance, how would you analyse Sri lanka 259 and Australia 2/260 in
>Sydney when looking at Warne's captaincy of the side?

>kdw

Well didn't see the game but heard some comments on the radio. Basically
the Ski Lankans should have scored more after that flying start. And a
couple of reports I read suggested he did ok in handling his bowling attack.

Will

 
 
 

Captain my Captain

Post by Wakelp » Mon, 18 Jan 1999 04:00:00

Shane Warnes captaincy really shon in the last 2 games, in my opiniion.

With Sri Lanka 0-95 off 15 overs it looked like a 300+ total on the cards
and the possibility of them runnign away with it. Shane applied the
pressures at the right times, bringing himself on to bowl (as he did
against England) and, as pointed out to by commentators at the time,
continued to attack and look for wickets to restrict the runs down to a
"gettable total".

The same philosiphy was not adopted by his senior, more experienced
counterparts Rnatunga (and Stewart on Friday) and they paid the
consequences by being trounced.

He rotated the bowlers well, and intelligently and I believe he won the
game in the 20-30 over mark when he was able to restrict Sri Lanka's run
scoring.

He seems to have the knack of making the right move at the right time, a
skill no doubt obtained by playing under one of the greatest captains of
all, and for someone with such limited experience I think he has done
exceptionally.

My only "slight" concern is that he seems to get a little flustered at
times, unlike Taylor or Waugh, who are very cool customers under pressure
(do you recall ever seeing them "lose there cool" on the field..even for a
moment? I cant.), although in the few games ive watched Warnie lead, he's
been visibly emotional, upset, frustrated, whatever at certain events on
the field. This may not be necessarily a "bad" thing, he has his own style
and he is his own person, but, as you rightly point out then, kdw, this may
hinder his ability to bring home a close match. Who can say, we will just
have to wait and see.

--
Regards
Peter

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Practice random acts of intelligence & senseless acts of self- control.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
> He's doing well, but the mark of a good captain is the amount of close
games
> he can pull off. The results so far don't show much about his captaincy.

> For instance, how would you analyse Sri lanka 259 and Australia 2/260 in
> Sydney when looking at Warne's captaincy of the side?

> kdw

 
 
 

Captain my Captain

Post by Geoff McArth » Thu, 21 Jan 1999 04:00:00

On Sun, 17 Jan 1999 08:50:37 +1000, "Glen Camarlinghi"

Quote:

>    Hasn't Shane Warne had an interesting start to his captaincy career for
>Australia?  Not only has he lead his side to three wins out of four, they
>have been three of the most thumping wins a captain could dream of.  Even
>the game he lost was by a very small margin.

>    Just maybe Shane Warne is the answer to Australia's future captaincy
>problems - even though I have a hang up about bowlers being captain.  Four
>games hardly makes a career.  But if we acknowledge a captain has most
>influence in the field (captains can't really do a lot to make the team bat
>better), in three out of four games he has kept his opposition to totals
>well under 200.

>    But as I said, it's VERY early days.

I have been critical on this ng of the decision to appoint Warne
entirely for reasons related to the "bookie scandal"  I have not
changed my view on this but my observations of his performance in the
first few ODIs would suggest that he clearly has natural ability as a
captain. The players seem to enjoy playing for him and he is always
trying something and in the game.

In fact, at the risk of being shot down, the players seemed to lose
their zip when Steve took over again. I imagine that they have very
different styles and that there is some adjusting required.

Geoff