Nice one Ian

Nice one Ian

Post by eusebiu » Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:55:15



Quote:

> > He averages 45+ while Dhoni averages under 40. While I'm not, as you
> > know, one for relying heavily on averages, that's a significant
> > difference


> difference to his overall average of 45+. But not as significant a
> difference as the significant difference between that figure of Prior's and


> a significant 50.2 v Eng/RSA/RotW. AND BAD'S NOT EVEN OUR #1 KEEPER. Matt
> Wade will own Prior. Significantly.

In what? I heard he kept wickets. Just not very well. He seems to bat
occasionally, but not quite as good as Haddin. So we have a guy who
keeps as badly as Haddin, and bats marginally less well. I think Healy
summed Wade's keeping up quite well.
 
 
 

Nice one Ian

Post by alve » Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:11:01

Quote:



>>> He averages 45+ while Dhoni averages under 40. While I'm not, as you
>>> know, one for relying heavily on averages, that's a significant
>>> difference


>> difference to his overall average of 45+. But not as significant a
>> difference as the significant difference between that figure of Prior's and


>> a significant 50.2 v Eng/RSA/RotW. AND BAD'S NOT EVEN OUR #1 KEEPER. Matt
>> Wade will own Prior. Significantly.

> In what? I heard he kept wickets. Just not very well. He seems to bat
> occasionally, but not quite as good as Haddin. So we have a guy who
> keeps as badly as Haddin, and bats marginally less well. I think Healy
> summed Wade's keeping up quite well.

You might want to test all your meters...

as

 
 
 

Nice one Ian

Post by eusebiu » Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:16:28


Quote:



> >>> He averages 45+ while Dhoni averages under 40. While I'm not, as you
> >>> know, one for relying heavily on averages, that's a significant
> >>> difference


> >> difference to his overall average of 45+. But not as significant a
> >> difference as the significant difference between that figure of Prior's and


> >> a significant 50.2 v Eng/RSA/RotW. AND BAD'S NOT EVEN OUR #1 KEEPER. Matt
> >> Wade will own Prior. Significantly.

> > In what? I heard he kept wickets. Just not very well. He seems to bat
> > occasionally, but not quite as good as Haddin. So we have a guy who
> > keeps as badly as Haddin, and bats marginally less well. I think Healy
> > summed Wade's keeping up quite well.

> You might want to test all your meters...

> as

You were too subtle on this occasion.