by Fran » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:30:39
You beauty!
Fran
by will_ » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:32:59
> You beauty!
> Fran
by Dick » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:00:38
> You beauty!
> Fran
by subi.. » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:30:44
> > You beauty!
> > Fran
> It's been great to watch the pair of them. How they can leave Hayden out of
> the one-dayers beats me.
hayden seems like he has been on sedatives with his leaden feet
movements, one of the most over-rated batsmen in the modern game whose
career has been helped along by the sorts of decisions we have seen in
this match. how he has continued to be in an international side is
beyond me. only partisan aussie fans can go on with the fiction of his
greatness.
by Fran » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:35:39
> > You beauty!
> > Fran
> It's been great to watch the pair of them. How they can leave Hayden out of
> the one-dayers beats me.
Fran
by Fran » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:38:46
> > > You beauty!
> > > Fran
> > It's been great to watch the pair of them. How they can leave Hayden out of
> > the one-dayers beats me.
> yes, apart from the 5-7 lives between them from the umpires, they were
> very well deserved hundreds. but then you could say that about all the
> 'aussie greats', no?
Fran
> hayden seems like he has been on sedatives with his leaden feet
> movements, one of the most over-rated batsmen in the modern game whose
> career has been helped along by the sorts of decisions we have seen in
> this match. how he has continued to be in an international side is
> beyond me. only partisan aussie fans can go on with the fiction of his
> greatness.
by sdavmo » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:45:23
>>> You beauty!
>>> Fran
>> It's been great to watch the pair of them. How they can leave Hayden out of
>> the one-dayers beats me.
> yes, apart from the 5-7 lives between them from the umpires, they were
> very well deserved hundreds. but then you could say that about all the
> 'aussie greats', no?
> hayden seems like he has been on sedatives with his leaden feet
> movements, one of the most over-rated batsmen in the modern game whose
> career has been helped along by the sorts of decisions we have seen in
> this match. how he has continued to be in an international side is
> beyond me. only partisan aussie fans can go on with the fiction of his
> greatness.
by Dick » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:18:54
>> > Once again,.I'm so glad to be proved wrong. I have to admit, I wouldn't
>> > have put money on a Symonds hundred if I'd been offered 20-1 as
>> > recently as yesterday, and he's done it in some style, not when the
>> > going has been easy but when it required patience. He even raised it in
>> > his own style with a six.
>> > You beauty!
>> > Fran
>> It's been great to watch the pair of them. How they can leave Hayden out
>> of
>> the one-dayers beats me.
> yes, apart from the 5-7 lives between them from the umpires, they were
> very well deserved hundreds. but then you could say that about all the
> 'aussie greats', no?
> hayden seems like he has been on sedatives with his leaden feet
> movements, one of the most over-rated batsmen in the modern game whose
> career has been helped along by the sorts of decisions we have seen in
> this match. how he has continued to be in an international side is
> beyond me. only partisan aussie fans can go on with the fiction of his
> greatness.
by sdavmo » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:17:55
>>>> You beauty!
>>>> Fran
>>> It's been great to watch the pair of them. How they can leave Hayden out
>>> of
>>> the one-dayers beats me.
>> yes, apart from the 5-7 lives between them from the umpires, they were
>> very well deserved hundreds. but then you could say that about all the
>> 'aussie greats', no?
>> hayden seems like he has been on sedatives with his leaden feet
>> movements, one of the most over-rated batsmen in the modern game whose
>> career has been helped along by the sorts of decisions we have seen in
>> this match. how he has continued to be in an international side is
>> beyond me. only partisan aussie fans can go on with the fiction of his
>> greatness.
> I can't imagine there's too many international cricketers who wouldn't love
> to look back on a career with 27 100s.
> I wonder how many centuries he would have had if he'd been picked all those
> years when he should have been in the side.
> Like all players he's had his share of bad and lucky decisions over the
> years - no more or less than anyone else I suspect.
[applause]
--
Cheers,
SDM -- a 21st century schizoid man
Systems Theory internet music project links:
official site <www.systemstheory.net>
soundclick <www.soundclick.com/systemstheory>
garageband <www.garageband.com/artist/systemstheory>
"Soundtracks For Imaginary Movies" CD released Dec 2004
"Codetalkers" CD coming Nov 2006
NP: nothing
by sdavmo » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:19:24
>>>>> You beauty!
>>>>> Fran
>>>> It's been great to watch the pair of them. How they can leave Hayden
>>>> out of
>>>> the one-dayers beats me.
>>> yes, apart from the 5-7 lives between them from the umpires, they were
>>> very well deserved hundreds. but then you could say that about all the
>>> 'aussie greats', no?
>>> hayden seems like he has been on sedatives with his leaden feet
>>> movements, one of the most over-rated batsmen in the modern game whose
>>> career has been helped along by the sorts of decisions we have seen in
>>> this match. how he has continued to be in an international side is
>>> beyond me. only partisan aussie fans can go on with the fiction of his
>>> greatness.
>> I can't imagine there's too many international cricketers who wouldn't
>> love to look back on a career with 27 100s.
>> I wonder how many centuries he would have had if he'd been picked all
>> those years when he should have been in the side.
>> Like all players he's had his share of bad and lucky decisions over
>> the years - no more or less than anyone else I suspect.
> I thought his innings was excellent. So what if he should have been out
> several times? It makes no difference. He saw off the England attack
> early on, then stabilized the innings, then plundered.
> [applause]
by vignes1.. » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:08:27
You beauty = Rudi?
Vicky:
> You beauty!
> Fran
by Ian Galbrait » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:14:09
> You beauty!
--
You Can't Stop The Signal
by Ian Galbrait » Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:14:46
[snip]
--
You Can't Stop The Signal
by Mad Hamis » Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:14:30
>> > > Once again,.I'm so glad to be proved wrong. I have to admit, I wouldn't
>> > > have put money on a Symonds hundred if I'd been offered 20-1 as
>> > > recently as yesterday, and he's done it in some style, not when the
>> > > going has been easy but when it required patience. He even raised it in
>> > > his own style with a six.
>> > > You beauty!
>> > > Fran
>> > It's been great to watch the pair of them. How they can leave Hayden out of
>> > the one-dayers beats me.
>> yes, apart from the 5-7 lives between them from the umpires, they were
>> very well deserved hundreds. but then you could say that about all the
>> 'aussie greats', no?
>They've both been a touch lucky -- Hayden much more than Roy, although
>Roy's luck was only arguable on replay -- on first viewing he could
>easily have nicked it onto the pad, and there was no clear view of how
>much bounce there was.
Mad Hamish
Hamish Laws
by Mad Hamis » Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:15:28
>[snip]
>> It's been great to watch the pair of them. How they can leave Hayden out of
>> the one-dayers beats me.
>Hayden's was hardly a one day style innings.
Mad Hamish
Hamish Laws