Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by R. R.Gal » Sat, 20 Jan 1996 04:00:00


It's all happening here..not any where in the world.. cheaters...Aussie
criketers... I love cricket.. cricket is my ***... but these ***y
aussie criketers and aussie commentators... support their own cheating
and that makes my *** boil.... Not forgetting ***y umpiring... with
these guys around no one can beat ***y aussies.  These guys are
spoiling the beauty of the game.  

Something has to done.

Aussies are not reaching semis in the world cup... any bets there...

India or Sri Lanka..... will be the champs....

See your face in the mirror... when supporting Aussie cricket.

I will not watch cricket when aussies are playing... this is my
resolution.

cherooo.

 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by ganes » Sat, 20 Jan 1996 04:00:00

Quote:

>It's all happening here..not any where in the world.. cheaters...Aussie
>criketers... I love cricket.. cricket is my ***... but these ***y
>aussie criketers and aussie commentators... support their own cheating
>and that makes my *** boil....

COOL DOWN DUDE

 Not forgetting ***y umpiring... with

Quote:
>these guys around no one can beat ***y aussies.  These guys are
>spoiling the beauty of the game.

>Something has to done.

Okay what do you propose to do about the aussies supposedly defacing the
beauty of the game

Quote:

>Aussies are not reaching semis in the world cup... any bets there...

I would not if I were you

Quote:

>India or Sri Lanka..... will be the champs....

Quite likely

Quote:

>See your face in the mirror... when supporting Aussie cricket.

Well nicole kidman and elle Mcpherson are of australian origin

Quote:

>I will not watch cricket when aussies are playing... this is my
>resolution.

You will miss the WC opener when aussies play SL in colombo
Quote:

>cherooo.

> (THIS POSTER CRIES FOR MATURITY)


 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by Krishnamoorthy Lakshminaray » Sat, 20 Jan 1996 04:00:00

From: ganesh <hg>

Quote:
>Well nicole kidman and elle Mcpherson are of australian origin

        Not so sure about Kidman, thought she was from NZ?

        -Lakshmi N.

 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by Charles Le » Sun, 21 Jan 1996 04:00:00

Quote:
ganesh (hg) writes:

>>It's all happening here..not any where in the world.. cheaters...Aussie
>>criketers... I love cricket.. cricket is my ***... but these ***y
>>aussie criketers and aussie commentators... support their own cheating
>>and that makes my *** boil....

> COOL DOWN DUDE

>  Not forgetting ***y umpiring... with
>>these guys around no one can beat ***y aussies.  These guys are
>>spoiling the beauty of the game.

>> (THIS POSTER CRIES FOR MATURITY)

May this observer ask a simple question? Do the Aussies travel with their
own umpires? If not, how do they manage to win on the road as well?
Or have they infiltrated the ranks of umpires from other countries as well?
I suppose it must be possible that there have been cases of test umpires who
have cheated, but although I can readily admit that umpires have been
wrong or sometimes even incompetent, I have never heard of an instance
where it can be said that a test umpire cheated. Let's face it ... the
Australians have the best ***y team around ... at the moment! Enough
with the whining!
Cheers!
Charles

--
"He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse and rode madly
off in all directions"
                - Stephen Leacock

 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by Flame B » Tue, 23 Jan 1996 04:00:00

Quote:
>May this observer ask a simple question? Do the Aussies travel with their
>own umpires? If not, how do they manage to win on the road as well?
>Or have they infiltrated the ranks of umpires from other countries as well?
>I suppose it must be possible that there have been cases of test umpires who
>have cheated, but although I can readily admit that umpires have been
>wrong or sometimes even incompetent, I have never heard of an instance
>where it can be said that a test umpire cheated. Let's face it ... the
>Australians have the best ***y team around ... at the moment! Enough
>with the whining!
>Cheers!
>Charles

You don't have your umpires on the road but your cheating team is still same
ol same ol.  When you have guys that claim catches after drapin' em hell you
don't need your umps. your players are doing ***y well in cheating.  Now you
cowards are thinking of withdrawing from the World Cup.  Warne boys Dipar is
fulla' shit now; he is too scared to face the hostile crowds :) If your media
your masses your cricket board all treat vistors the way they have (shitty
umpiring agianst india 1991-, Ball tampreing allegations against SL,
Chucking.. and not to mention the ***y umpiring agian, ball tampreing and
bribary allegations aginst Pak) then threats to your players shouldn't come as
any surprise.  SL would've won the WSC finals had it not been cheating
especially in the 1st match.. digesting 2 LBW's.  Funny :) how all the
contrivorsies seem to involve Australia.

--Keep your flames to yourself.
Try to reason what I've said and then tell me if any of this is wrong :)

G'day.

 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by Kurt Tools » Tue, 23 Jan 1996 04:00:00


(in response to a post by Charles Levy):

Quote:

>You don't have your umpires on the road but your cheating team is still same
>ol same ol.  When you have guys that claim catches after drapin' em hell you
>don't need your umps. your players are doing ***y well in cheating.  Now you
>cowards are thinking of withdrawing from the World Cup.  Warne boys Dipar is
>fulla' shit now; he is too scared to face the hostile crowds :) If your media
>your masses your cricket board all treat vistors the way they have (shitty
>umpiring agianst india 1991-, Ball tampreing allegations against SL,
>Chucking.. and not to mention the ***y umpiring agian, ball tampreing and
>bribary allegations aginst Pak) then threats to your players shouldn't come as
>any surprise.  SL would've won the WSC finals had it not been cheating
>especially in the 1st match.. digesting 2 LBW's.  Funny :) how all the
>contrivorsies seem to involve Australia.

>--Keep your flames to yourself.
>Try to reason what I've said and then tell me if any of this is wrong :)

>G'day.

Well, Charles, I guess that what you get for sticking up for the
Aussies. Of course, I myself have been mistaken for an Oz-man,
in the past. Twas an irate Pakistani fan, on that occasion.

Ah weel, I know you will pay no attention to the above diatribe.

yours, in support,

Kurt

---
=================================================================
Do not select the "Reply to sender" feature, if you wish to email
me directly. My systems newsreader is incorrectly configured, and
my email address will be truncated. If you wish to e-mail me
directly, use the address given below :


 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by Charles Le » Tue, 23 Jan 1996 04:00:00

Quote:

>>May this observer ask a simple question? Do the Aussies travel with their
>>own umpires? If not, how do they manage to win on the road as well?
>>Or have they infiltrated the ranks of umpires from other countries as well?
>>I suppose it must be possible that there have been cases of test umpires who
>>have cheated, but although I can readily admit that umpires have been
>>wrong or sometimes even incompetent, I have never heard of an instance
>>where it can be said that a test umpire cheated. Let's face it ... the
>>Australians have the best ***y team around ... at the moment! Enough
>>with the whining!
>>Cheers!
>>Charles

> You don't have your umpires on the road but your cheating team is still same
> ol same ol.  When you have guys that claim catches after drapin' em hell you
> don't need your umps. your players are doing ***y well in cheating.  Now you
> cowards are thinking of withdrawing from the World Cup.  Warne boys Dipar is
> fulla' shit now; he is too scared to face the hostile crowds :) If your media
> your masses your cricket board all treat vistors the way they have (shitty
> umpiring agianst india 1991-, Ball tampreing allegations against SL,
> Chucking.. and not to mention the ***y umpiring agian, ball tampreing and
> bribary allegations aginst Pak) then threats to your players shouldn't come as
> any surprise.  SL would've won the WSC finals had it not been cheating
> especially in the 1st match.. digesting 2 LBW's.  Funny :) how all the
> contrivorsies seem to involve Australia.

> --Keep your flames to yourself.
> Try to reason what I've said and then tell me if any of this is wrong :)

> G'day.

G'day yourself! No flames, but...
As this is the second time since posting the original that I have been
identified as an Australian (there must be a m***somewhere there to do
with making hasty and faulty deductions :-) let me proudly disabuse you of
this notion and assure you that I am as West Indian as a Jamaican can be.
I hold NO brief for Australia, and when the WI are not involved, my full
support is shifted to India. [All this is (and should be) entirely
incidental, but then, this is not a perfect world!] Nevertheless, the
points I am trying to make still hold:
1) International test umpires (including Australian ones) DO make
mistakes, and CAN be (in some cases) incompetent. I do NOT accept that
there is any proof that any test umpire cheats or has cheated.
2) Australia  - AT THIS POINT IN TIME - is "the best ***y team" around,
whether playing at home or abroad.
3) Anyone who attributes Australia's winning record to cheating umpires or
cheating players is a "whiner"!

As an afterthought, it strikes me that there is a HELL of a lot more
griping about "cheats" among the members of rsc than there is among the
players. In fact, except for the Malik/Warne *** allegations,(which
were ironically brought BY Australians, not AGAINST them!) can anyone
"document" a case  where a player has actually accused another player or
an umpire of cheating? And don't say that it's because they fear official
reprisal ... there haven't been any accusations by retired players who
have nothing to lose!

Again ... quit whining and start supporting whatever country you root for
to whip the pants off the Aussies ... on the cricket field!
Cheers!
Charles

--
"He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse and rode madly
off in all directions"
                - Stephen Leacock

 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by dw blu » Tue, 23 Jan 1996 04:00:00

Quote:

>From: ganesh <hg>
>>Well nicole kidman and elle Mcpherson are of australian origin
>    Not so sure about Kidman, thought she was from NZ?

 Nope, we've claimed a lot of Kiwis over the years, but she's not one
of them

cheers
dw blurb

Quote:
>    -Lakshmi N.

 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by r.. » Wed, 24 Jan 1996 04:00:00

|> You don't have your umpires on the road but your cheating team is still same
|> ol same ol.  When you have guys that claim catches after drapin' em hell you

I suppose you're referring to Steve Waugh catching Brian Lara?  What about
Roger Harper's supposed catch of Michael Bevan on New Years Day?  Harper
hasn't been called a cheat in any Australian newspapers or by any Australian
commentators.  Harper made a MISTAKE and said so afterwards.  Lara believed
Waugh's account of the catch, and that's good enough for me.

|> don't need your umps. your players are doing ***y well in cheating.  Now you

How is bad umpiring related to players cheating?

|> cowards are thinking of withdrawing from the World Cup.  Warne boys Dipar is
|> fulla' shit now; he is too scared to face the hostile crowds :) If your media
|> your masses your cricket board all treat vistors the way they have (shitty
|> umpiring agianst india 1991-, Ball tampreing allegations against SL,

ditto

|> Chucking.. and not to mention the ***y umpiring agian, ball tampreing and

again, what it comes down to is some pretty apalling umpiring.

|> bribary allegations aginst Pak) then threats to your players shouldn't come as
|> any surprise.  SL would've won the WSC finals had it not been cheating
|> especially in the 1st match.. digesting 2 LBW's.  Funny :) how all the
|> contrivorsies seem to involve Australia.

Except when Michael Atherton pulls dirt out of his pockets and tampers
with the ball and then denies it. Or doesn't that count as a controversy?

|>
|> --Keep your flames to yourself.

OK

|> Try to reason what I've said and then tell me if any of this is wrong :)

Done

|>
|> G'day.

G'day to you to.

 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by Charles Le » Thu, 25 Jan 1996 04:00:00

Quote:


> (Charles Levy) writes:

> :>May this observer ask a simple question? Do the Aussies travel with their
> :>own umpires? If not, how do they manage to win on the road as well?

> They lost badly to the Windies with Windies Umpires. It would be interesting

Really? Check the record for the last WI/AUS series *in the WI* in 1994:

1) Aus bt WI by 10 wkts.  .....Barbados
2) Draw  ....... Antigua
4) Aus bt WI by innings and 53 runs ..... Jamaica

As a West Indian, I take no pleasure in the above, but don't talk ***
about Australia losing badly to the Windies. At least WI aren't whining
about it ... we'll recoup and beat the tar out of them ... on the cricket
field!
Cheers!
Charles

--
"He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse and rode madly
off in all directions"
                - Stephen Leacock

 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by Jason Curr » Thu, 25 Jan 1996 04:00:00

Quote:

>> ganesh (hg) writes:

>> >>It's all happening here..not any where in the world.. cheaters...Aussie
>> >>criketers... I love cricket.. cricket is my ***... but these ***y
>> >>aussie criketers and aussie commentators... support their own cheating
>> >>and that makes my *** boil....

>> > COOL DOWN DUDE

>> >  Not forgetting ***y umpiring... with
>> >>these guys around no one can beat ***y aussies.  These guys are
>> >>spoiling the beauty of the game.

>> >> (THIS POSTER CRIES FOR MATURITY)

>> May this observer ask a simple question? Do the Aussies travel with their
>> own umpires? If not, how do they manage to win on the road as well?
>> Or have they infiltrated the ranks of umpires from other countries as well?
>> I suppose it must be possible that there have been cases of test umpires who
>> have cheated, but although I can readily admit that umpires have been
>> wrong or sometimes even incompetent, I have never heard of an instance
>> where it can be said that a test umpire cheated. Let's face it ... the
>> Australians have the best ***y team around ... at the moment! Enough
>> with the whining!
>> Cheers!
>> Charles

>> --
>> "He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse and rode madly
>> off in all directions"
>>       - Stephen Leacock
>After watching the WSC finals on Thursday and Saturday, we can definitely say
>that Australia's umpires are like their cricket commentators, very, very biased.
>Watching the dismissal of Kaluwitharana on Thursday and the dismissal of
>Kalpage on Saturday, and umpire?? Steve Randall's refusal of a runner for
>Arjuna, you have to agree.

Kalu had nothing to argue about on Thursday.. ball was gunna hit the
stumps.. Leg stump is still part of the stumps you know.. And umm..
Kalpage was caught by Taylor.. quite clearly a catch... So what did
*biased* umpiring have to do with it?
And now for the Arjuna runner incident :)
Firstly.. Arjuna is the slowest guy in the Sri Lankan team, and other
than that he is clearly not fit.. Also other thasn being slow he is a
dreadful runner.   When their fielding he spends so much time off the
ground you'd be convinced he didn't really want to field (or maybe
conserve his energy?).  So when he asks for a runner cause he's got
cramp and Jayasariya (the fastest guy in the Sri Lankan team) appears
something quite not right is happening.. Unfortunately there is room
in the law for refusing a runner because it is unfair.. the only way I
could think was that saying cramp wasn't a injury or an illness..
After all Arjuna had been running for the first plenty of his innings
fine.. (then started limping after the runner was refused!)

Quote:
>Regarding your point that you have the best ***y team in the world, you are
>going to get one hell of a hiding - just like in the rugby world cup - against
>South Africa.

jason Currey

 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by Simon Thomps » Thu, 25 Jan 1996 04:00:00


Quote:
(Charles Levy) writes:

:>May this observer ask a simple question? Do the Aussies travel with their
:>own umpires? If not, how do they manage to win on the road as well?

They lost badly to the Windies with Windies Umpires. It would be interesting
to see their win/loss ratio at home versus away.

:>Or have they infiltrated the ranks of umpires from other countries as well?
:>I suppose it must be possible that there have been cases of test umpires who
:>have cheated, but although I can readily admit that umpires have been
:>wrong or sometimes even incompetent, I have never heard of an instance
:>where it can be said that a test umpire cheated. Let's face it ... the
:>Australians have the best ***y team around ... at the moment! Enough
:>with the whining!

With nuetral umpires that can be accepted. With some of the decisions in the
last WSC it is extremely debatable. If Oz wants to use the WSC cup to make
that claim, they have to have independent umpires. While mistakes will still
be made, it removes the risk it will be labeled bias.

IMHO, it is time the ICC made independednt umpires, at both ends (not sure
about the third) compulsory for all internationals as virtually every other
major sport has.

+---------------------------
| Simon Thompson
| Christchurch
| New Zealand

 
 
 

Aussie Aussie commentators support cheaters

Post by S.M. Loffl » Fri, 26 Jan 1996 04:00:00

: something quite not right is happening.. Unfortunately there is room
: in the law for refusing a runner because it is unfair.. the only way I
: could think was that saying cramp wasn't a injury or an illness..

Straying from the point a bit, that's the law in tennis - cramp is
considered a "loss of condition", not an injury, and a player can't
call an injury timeout for it or get treatment.  Case in point - Pat
Rafter v Sergei Brugera at Wimbledon (94 or 95), it's about 7-7 in
the final set, and Rafter cramps up so badly he can barely stand.
He had to watch the balls whizz past down the lines, and the match was
over in 2 minutes.

Then again, commentators said that he should have pretended he'd
pulled a muscle and got a breather/treatment.  A cheating Aussie
like Rafter wouldn't think fo that, though :)
--
--------------------------------------
| Steven Loffler                     |
| Department of Chemical Engineering |
| University of Cambridge            |

| Phone: +44 1223 334793             |
| Fax  : +44 1223 334796             |
--------------------------------------