SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by bobs » Wed, 19 Jan 2000 04:00:00


Quote:

> 25 matches 3 100s 1 50 avg 37.8
> 186* Vs NZ

I don't remember him getting 186* against us. I guess I have a selective memory.
;-)
Quote:

> 140* Vs Kenya
> 120 Vs SL
> 85 Vs Zim
> contributing 531 runs in 869 runs in that period.

> Rest 21 knocks avging 15.

> * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
> The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!

 
 
 

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by Shridha » Wed, 19 Jan 2000 04:00:00



Quote:
> Yet another attempt by Mr. Shridhar2000 to assert his point by giving
> misleading and false statements. RSC'ians take note of this.

Hey moron, i don't care a shit whether RSC takes note of this or not.
Talk to me directly if you have even an iota of cricketing sense in you.

Learn first how to wear your undies before you throw your napkin away.

Shridhar

--
"East or West Aggy is the best"

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

 
 
 

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by Shridha » Wed, 19 Jan 2000 04:00:00



Quote:
> In fact Dravid has been doing badly in Tests offlate. If he continues
> this way he needs to be dropped.

So how about calculating Azhar's avg against even reasonably strong
attacks? Like his 20 + avgs against Aus in Aus in 1992, RSA in 1993, RSA
in 1996 and lately pathetic scores against Pak. So, he should have been
dropped in 1993 itself, right?

Quote:
>You can't have one rule
> for Azhar and one for the rest.

Yes, thats absolutely correct except that this was applicable from the
period of 1992-1999!!!

Shridhar

--
"East or West Aggy is the best"

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

 
 
 

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by Sundarraman Subramania » Wed, 19 Jan 2000 04:00:00

I don't think it is a bad idea to give Sachin a break from
ODI's altogether or play him only for important matches.
In the final reckoning all ODI's save the WC will be
insignificant, IMO.

Sundar

Quote:
> Heh :-) So what happens if we change the topic to "Dravid's batting
> since Jan 1999 in tests" ? :-) We get:

...
Quote:
> Are you going to say "he should give tests a miss, Iam not too elated
> with his high scores against mediocre attacks" ? :-)

 
 
 

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by Shiv » Wed, 19 Jan 2000 04:00:00

Quote:



> >Gavaskar, career average 51.12, Runs 10122.
> >Games in which he had 100's & 50's contributed a whopping 8516 runs
> >towards that.

> >21 odd.

> "Er.....never lets stats cloud the complete and the whole truth.".

> If you remove games where he scores 50 or more, then the
> maximum score in the remaining games has to be 49. Assuming
> an equal spread of scores, one would expect an average
> of 24.5. So what does your statistic show then ?

It shows that the original statistic to which John1000 was responding to
was clouding the truth.

--
regards,
Shiva

http://www.slack.net/~shiva/

 
 
 

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by Shiv » Wed, 19 Jan 2000 04:00:00

Quote:


> Shridhar in case you didn't know, Bill O Brian is none other than AMN.

And who is AMN ?

--
regards,
Shiva

http://www.slack.net/~shiva/

 
 
 

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by Shridha » Thu, 20 Jan 2000 04:00:00



Quote:


> > Shridhar in case you didn't know, Bill O Brian is none other than
AMN.

> And who is AMN ?

Ammanur Narayanan better known as A moron Narayanan posting from HP
Bangalore.

Shridhar

--
"East or West Aggy is the best"

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

 
 
 

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by Farhan Ani » Sat, 22 Jan 2000 04:00:00

Quote:
----- Original Message -----


Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2000 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

> Message from the Deja.com forum:
> rec.sport.cricket
> Your subscription is set to individual email delivery


>> >25 matches 3 100s 1 50 avg 37.8
>> >186* Vs NZ
>> >140* Vs Kenya

>> This really shouldn't count. There's something wrong if these make it
into
>> the official records.

>Why ?

>--
>regards,
>Shiva

I think you are new to cricket Shiva.
---
Farhan.

Quote:
>http://www.slack.net/~shiva/

> _____________________________________________________________
> Deja.com: Before you buy.
> http://www.deja.com/
> * To modify or remove your subscription, go to
> http://www.deja.com/edit_sub.xp?group=rec.sport.cricket
> * Read this thread at
> http://www.deja.com/thread/%3C3882115C.2B16D723%40bigfoot.com%3E

 Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
 Before you buy.
 
 
 

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by Shiv » Sat, 22 Jan 2000 04:00:00

Quote:

> ----- Original Message -----


> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2000 11:43 PM
> Subject: Re: SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

> > Message from the Deja.com forum:
> > rec.sport.cricket
> > Your subscription is set to individual email delivery


> >> >25 matches 3 100s 1 50 avg 37.8
> >> >186* Vs NZ
> >> >140* Vs Kenya

> >> This really shouldn't count. There's something wrong if these make it
> into
> >> the official records.

> >Why ?

> >--
> >regards,
> >Shiva

> I think you are new to cricket Shiva.

I think you are new to the meaning of "official records" Farhan.

--
cheers,
Shiva
http://www.slack.net/~shiva/

 
 
 

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by Andrew Vallne » Mon, 24 Jan 2000 04:00:00

Quote:

>> >> >25 matches 3 100s 1 50 avg 37.8
>> >> >186* Vs NZ
>> >> >140* Vs Kenya

>> >> This really shouldn't count. There's something wrong if these make it
>> into
>> >> the official records.

>> >Why ?

Because Kenya is not within light years of being a full Test cricket nation.
The records should cut off further up the food chain than Kenya. And UAE,
Scotland and the rest, even if SRT hits 400 against one of them.

IMHO.

The Wog

 
 
 

SRT's batting since Jan 1999 in ODIs

Post by Shiv » Mon, 24 Jan 2000 04:00:00

Quote:


> >> >> >25 matches 3 100s 1 50 avg 37.8
> >> >> >186* Vs NZ
> >> >> >140* Vs Kenya

> >> >> This really shouldn't count. There's something wrong if these make it
> >> into
> >> >> the official records.

> >> >Why ?

> Because Kenya is not within light years of being a full Test cricket nation.

How is that relevant.
Kenya has OD status.

Quote:
> The records should cut off further up the food chain than Kenya. And UAE,
> Scotland and the rest, even if SRT hits 400 against one of them.

Then don't let them play OD matches.

--
regards,
Shiva

http://www.slack.net/~shiva/