Taylor, poor batting and poor Captaincy

Taylor, poor batting and poor Captaincy

Post by Couga » Fri, 06 Jun 1997 04:00:00


Well Taylor has done it again.

On an overcast day and a good bowling pitch he has elected to put Australia
into bat. Is he perhaps over anxious to get out there and hit himself into
form? Well if that was his idea, it didn't work, as you would all know by
now. The Australian's are (as I write this), in some dissarray, three out,
Blewitt just bowled on a No Ball. And then Caught. 28/4. And who was the
man who put them there? TAYLOR.

He is IMO a liability, and must be left out of the next test. Right now it
could be McGrath and Gillespie ripping into the English batsman. But Taylor
has (to take an extremely inflamtory view, which as you know i'm good at
when it comes to Taylor) put himself before country, being so concerned
with his batting he has decided he wants to get out there, and in doing so
has put Australia into a bad spot after less than an hour has passed.

Ok ok, I expect to get shot down in flames for those comments, but what the
hey.

I'll be interested to know if anyone agrees.

Cougar
--
_____________________

MMMMmmmmm.......DONUTS!!    (Barts Dad)
_______________________

 
 
 

Taylor, poor batting and poor Captaincy

Post by Marki » Fri, 06 Jun 1997 04:00:00

: Well Taylor has done it again.
:
: On an overcast day and a good bowling pitch he has elected to put Australia
: into bat. Is he perhaps over anxious to get out there and hit himself into
: form? Well if that was his idea, it didn't work, as you would all know by
: now. The Australian's are (as I write this), in some dissarray, three out,
: Blewitt just bowled on a No Ball. And then Caught. 28/4. And who was the
: man who put them there? TAYLOR.
:
: He is IMO a liability, and must be left out of the next test. Right now it
: could be McGrath and Gillespie ripping into the English batsman. But Taylor
: has (to take an extremely inflamtory view, which as you know i'm good at
: when it comes to Taylor) put himself before country, being so concerned
: with his batting he has decided he wants to get out there, and in doing so
: has put Australia into a bad spot after less than an hour has passed.
:
: Ok ok, I expect to get shot down in flames for those comments, but what the
: hey.
:
: I'll be interested to know if anyone agrees.
:
: Cougar

I totally agree with you.  The score is now 8 for about 57.
Taylor's woeful situation must be having an effect on the team.
I am sure there are players sitting around wondering what they have to do
make their places secure when the captain's career is in such disarray.

As I have just heard on radio, Stuart Law is playing very well for his English
team, and has adapted very well to English cricket.  Yet no mention of even
getting a sniff of an ashes squad position, whilst the Australian team
is in a shocking state.  Australia have lost the 1-day series 3-0.
The first test now seems all but lost, big changes must come now.

Markian Jaworsky.

 
 
 

Taylor, poor batting and poor Captaincy

Post by Mad Hami » Sun, 08 Jun 1997 04:00:00



Quote:

>Well Taylor has done it again.

>On an overcast day and a good bowling pitch he has elected to put Australia
>into bat.

The day was overcast but I wouldn't say that the pitch was that bad to bat
on, Elliott got out to a pearler, Taylor chased a wide one, Mark Waugh left a
_big_ gap between bat and pad, Steve Waugh got a very good ball but it didn't
do a massive amount, Blewett got a ball which swung in and then cut away,
Bevan played a limp shot. Healy chased one and the tail showed that runs
could be made. As did Thorpe and hussain.

Quote:
> Is he perhaps over anxious to get out there and hit himself into
>form? Well if that was his idea, it didn't work, as you would all know by
>now. The Australian's are (as I write this), in some dissarray, three out,
>Blewitt just bowled on a No Ball. And then Caught. 28/4. And who was the
>man who put them there? TAYLOR.

I'd say that gough and Caddick deserve the credit for getting Australia in a
bad position more than Taylor deserves to be criticised for deciding to bat.

Quote:

>He is IMO a liability, and must be left out of the next test.

I would still agree but it will be hard after he's scored 100 in the second
dig. The real worry is that after 20 innings without a 50 isn't enough to
have him dropped what will be?

Quote:
> Right now it
>could be McGrath and Gillespie ripping into the English batsman.

They got their chance later in the day and didn't look anywhere near as good
_in_these_conditions_ as the English attack. Kasprowicz looked the best of
the bowlers to me.

Quote:
> But Taylor
>has (to take an extremely inflamtory view, which as you know i'm good at
>when it comes to Taylor) put himself before country, being so concerned
>with his batting he has decided he wants to get out there,

The decision to bat first was reasonable, but good bowling and terrible
batting gave a poor result (from the Australian point of view).

Quote:
> and in doing so
>has put Australia into a bad spot after less than an hour has passed.

>_____________________

>MMMMmmmmm.......DONUTS!!    (Barts Dad)
>_______________________

The name of the character is Homer Simpson.

--
****************************************************************************
The Politician's Slogan
'You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all
of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.
Fortunately only a simple majority is required.'
****************************************************************************
Mad Hamish
Hamish Laws


 
 
 

Taylor, poor batting and poor Captaincy

Post by Joshua Saunder » Mon, 09 Jun 1997 04:00:00

Quote:

>Well Taylor has done it again.

Well as I write, he has indeed. But I'll be generous and ignroe that.

Quote:
>On an overcast day and a good bowling pitch he has elected to put Australia
>into bat.

Oh he's done THAT again. Like in umm Sydney or Brisbane v WI?

Quote:
> Is he perhaps over anxious to get out there and hit himself into
>form? Well if that was his idea, it didn't work, as you would all know by
>now. The Australian's are (as I write this), in some dissarray, three out,
>Blewitt just bowled on a No Ball. And then Caught. 28/4. And who was the
>man who put them there? TAYLOR.

Yep, it's all Taylor's fault. You're right, if Taylor is supposed to be
some masterful tactician, and be in the side "because the team is
winning", he has to look to be dropped as soon as Australia falls behind
in a series, and he's not scoring runs. Won't be this series though, will
it Cougar?

Quote:
>He is IMO a liability, and must be left out of the next test. Right now it
>could be McGrath and Gillespie ripping into the English batsman.

They got a go later on. Unfortunately Hussain and Thorpe couldn't be
persuaded to bat as inanely as say Blewett and Bevan had.

Quote:
>But Taylor
>has (to take an extremely inflamtory view, which as you know i'm good at
>when it comes to Taylor) put himself before country, being so concerned
>with his batting he has decided he wants to get out there, and in doing so
>has put Australia into a bad spot after less than an hour has passed.

OTOH if he scores big, sets Australia up to firstly save the game and then
look to win the game, his head comes right off the chopping block. I know,
you meant to add that.

Quote:
>Ok ok, I expect to get shot down in flames for those comments, but what the
>hey.

>I'll be interested to know if anyone agrees.

I agreed.

Josh