by La » Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:04:34
Yes, it was a rather insrcutable decision, they should have waited a
couple of overs more, but just take a look at "The Hindu" online
edition's frontpage.
The 300 gets a passing reference.
What nonsense. Let the guy, Sehwag have his moment in the sun.
Big deal, Sachin missed his 200, bigger news-worthy item is the
triple.
-Lax
by V » Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:18:13
> Yes, it was a rather insrcutable decision, they should have waited a
> couple of overs more, but just take a look at "The Hindu" online
> edition's frontpage.
> The 300 gets a passing reference.
> What nonsense. Let the guy, Sehwag have his moment in the sun.
> Big deal, Sachin missed his 200, bigger news-worthy item is the
> triple.
by Ravishankar K » Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:23:14
> Yes, it was a rather insrcutable decision, they should have waited a
> couple of overs more, but just take a look at "The Hindu" online
> edition's frontpage.
> The 300 gets a passing reference.
> What nonsense. Let the guy, Sehwag have his moment in the sun.
> Big deal, Sachin missed his 200, bigger news-worthy item is the
> triple.
> -Lax
Sehwag should get all the accolades he deserves.
-Ravi
by bad haik » Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:24:11
> > I think more space has been devoted to Sachin missing his 200 than
> > Sehwag's 300.
> > Enough already!
> > Yes, it was a rather insrcutable decision, they should have waited a
> > couple of overs more, but just take a look at "The Hindu" online
> > edition's frontpage.
> > The 300 gets a passing reference.
> > What nonsense. Let the guy, Sehwag have his moment in the sun.
> > Big deal, Sachin missed his 200, bigger news-worthy item is the
> > triple.
> No Offense, but if you don;t like reading about something, don't read
about
> it. Simple.
by Ravishankar K » Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:38:10
>>>I think more space has been devoted to Sachin missing his 200 than
>>>Sehwag's 300.
>>>Enough already!
>>>Yes, it was a rather insrcutable decision, they should have waited a
>>>couple of overs more, but just take a look at "The Hindu" online
>>>edition's frontpage.
>>>The 300 gets a passing reference.
>>>What nonsense. Let the guy, Sehwag have his moment in the sun.
>>>Big deal, Sachin missed his 200, bigger news-worthy item is the
>>>triple.
>>No Offense, but if you don;t like reading about something, don't read
> about
>>it. Simple.
> Criticism of emphasis
> scandal before achievement
> Lax has a point
:-)
by bad haik » Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:59:38
> >>>I think more space has been devoted to Sachin missing his 200 than
> >>>Sehwag's 300.
> >>>Enough already!
> >>>Yes, it was a rather insrcutable decision, they should have waited a
> >>>couple of overs more, but just take a look at "The Hindu" online
> >>>edition's frontpage.
> >>>The 300 gets a passing reference.
> >>>What nonsense. Let the guy, Sehwag have his moment in the sun.
> >>>Big deal, Sachin missed his 200, bigger news-worthy item is the
> >>>triple.
> >>No Offense, but if you don;t like reading about something, don't read
> > about
> >>it. Simple.
> > Criticism of emphasis
> > scandal before achievement
> > Lax has a point
> Emphasis on criticism
> Scandal after achievement
> Bad Haiku it is
> :-)
by Anonymou » Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:21:42
by Shripathi Kamat » Thu, 01 Apr 2004 01:36:27
> > I think more space has been devoted to Sachin missing his 200 than
> > Sehwag's 300.
> > Enough already!
> > Yes, it was a rather insrcutable decision, they should have waited a
> > couple of overs more, but just take a look at "The Hindu" online
> > edition's frontpage.
> > The 300 gets a passing reference.
> > What nonsense. Let the guy, Sehwag have his moment in the sun.
> > Big deal, Sachin missed his 200, bigger news-worthy item is the
> > triple.
> > -Lax
> Agreed.
> If Dravid had been left stranded at even 294*, a few lines about what a
> great team player he was would have been all that would have been said.
Speaking of which, Ponting, the captain of the best team in the world, says
that he would not have stranded one of his players on 194.
> Ganguly was stranded at 98* in SL (under somewhat different circs) and it
> did not get more than a paragraph.
Like when Dravid was 'allowed' to score the winning runs in T2 in the last
AUS series
--
Shripathi Kamath
by Anonymou » Thu, 01 Apr 2004 02:02:43
1. Report on today's game(not that we havent had enough already:)
2. Ways to get out - my last word (enough, already!)
3. As if their tour wasn't bad enough already...
10. Enough is Enough: It is time for Azhar to retire.......
11. enough is enough (was Re: First 9 yrs of Miandad and Tendulkar)
13. Enough is Enough