Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by Coli » Thu, 27 Aug 1998 04:00:00


Channel 7 has out bidded channel 9 for the live
telecast of the cricket from England in 2001.

At last no more ch 9 commentators. This is a breath
of fresh air.

Channel 7 will telecast all the test matches and all the
one day matches.

Anything is better than the appauling telecast of ch 9
last time round in 1997 when only we west aussies only
got the last session of play.

 
 
 

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by Courtenay LeeSh » Thu, 27 Aug 1998 04:00:00

Quote:

>Channel 7 has out bidded channel 9 for the live
>telecast of the cricket from England in 2001.

are they going to show every session?? I hope so ..

Quote:
>At last no more ch 9 commentators. This is a breath
>of fresh air.

hmm I kidan like the channel 9 team - sure bill gives ppl the shits
and Richie is prolly going senile, but channel 7's effort to cover the
South African tour was just embarrassing!!  
How does Craig McDermott talk with only one lip moving?? amazing!

kort
--
 "I don't like much really do I?  But what I do like, I love passionately"
 ------------------------ Pet Shop Boys, "Paninaro" ----------------------
               Courtenay LEE SHOY  (The PSBoy or Bored Kort)


 
 
 

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by nospamsi.. » Thu, 27 Aug 1998 04:00:00

Quote:

>Channel 7 has out bidded channel 9 for the live
>telecast of the cricket from England in 2001.

>At last no more ch 9 commentators. This is a breath
>of fresh air.

>Channel 7 will telecast all the test matches and all the
>one day matches.

>Anything is better than the appauling telecast of ch 9
>last time round in 1997 when only we west aussies only
>got the last session of play.

I believe that was one of the main reasons why Ch 9 lost the rights.

 
 
 

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by bcook » Thu, 27 Aug 1998 04:00:00

Quote:

> Channel 7 has out bidded channel 9 for the live
> telecast of the cricket from England in 2001.

> At last no more ch 9 commentators. This is a breath
> of fresh air.

> Channel 7 will telecast all the test matches and all the
> one day matches.

> Anything is better than the appauling telecast of ch 9
> last time round in 1997 when only we west aussies only
> got the last session of play.

Hate to burst your bubble, Colin, but The Age is taking a more cynical
view. ( http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980826/sport/sport4.html ). They
point out that there is no guarantee that the Ashes will be free-to-air.
Channel 7 has stated that their commitment is to footy, and where footy
and cricket clash, footy will win out.

</quote>
Now, if Seven had had the rights to last year's tour, there would
have been 16 instances of AFL matches clashing with Test matches.
There would also have been six Mondays on which the cricket
would have clashed with Talking Footy. Talk about clashes for the
Ashes!

Bateman said that where clashes could not be avoided, the cricket
would be shown on "another service". Translated, that might mean
another free-to-air network, but almost certainly means one of the
pay networks, Optus or Foxtel.
</unquote>

I hope for the sake of Aussie cricket fans that The Age is wrong, but
knowing the way Channel 7 works, I would guess that if you don't have
pay TV, you won't see much of the 2001 ashes.

Cheers,
Brian

--
   ******************************************************************
   |  A. Brian Cooke, Ph.D.                                         |
   |  Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering          |

   |  University of New Brunswick       | phone: (506) 453-3510     |
   |  P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton        | fax:   (506) 453-3568     |
   |  New Brunswick, E3B 5A3 CANADA     | http://www.unb.ca/civil/  |
   ******************************************************************

 
 
 

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by bcook » Thu, 27 Aug 1998 04:00:00

Quote:


> >Anything is better than the appauling telecast of ch 9
> >last time round in 1997 when only we west aussies only
> >got the last session of play.

> I believe that was one of the main reasons why Ch 9 lost the rights.

According to a story in The Age, Ch9 didn't even bid for the rights
because of the lousy ratings for the last Ashes tour.

Cheers,
Brian
--
   ******************************************************************
   |  A. Brian Cooke, Ph.D.                                         |
   |  Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering          |

   |  University of New Brunswick       | phone: (506) 453-3510     |
   |  P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton        | fax:   (506) 453-3568     |
   |  New Brunswick, E3B 5A3 CANADA     | http://www.unb.ca/civil/  |
   ******************************************************************

 
 
 

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by Dianne van Dulk » Thu, 27 Aug 1998 04:00:00

<snip>

Quote:
>Hate to burst your bubble, Colin, but The Age is taking a more cynical
>view. ( http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980826/sport/sport4.html ). They
>point out that there is no guarantee that the Ashes will be free-to-air.
>Channel 7 has stated that their commitment is to footy, and where footy
>and cricket clash, footy will win out.

></quote>
>Now, if Seven had had the rights to last year's tour, there would
>have been 16 instances of AFL matches clashing with Test matches.
>There would also have been six Mondays on which the cricket
>would have clashed with Talking Footy. Talk about clashes for the
>Ashes!

>Bateman said that where clashes could not be avoided, the cricket
>would be shown on "another service". Translated, that might mean
>another free-to-air network, but almost certainly means one of the
>pay networks, Optus or Foxtel.
></unquote>

>I hope for the sake of Aussie cricket fans that The Age is wrong, but
>knowing the way Channel 7 works, I would guess that if you don't have
>pay TV, you won't see much of the 2001 ashes.

I strongly doubt you are correct here Brian.  There is a pretty
serious time difference between England and here, we are +10 hours.
So that means that when the tests are starting, it will be 9pm here.
Even the twilight games are generally finished by then.

What I would imagine will happen is that they will delay the football
repeats until after the cricket is finished.  Hell for we poor
creatures in Sydney who have a rotten time in seeing them in the first
place (or course, owning a TV would help...)

On that note, just before this weekend GO THE MIGHTY BOMBERS!!  Kill
the cats!  (sorry, I know wrong sport)

Cheers

Di
Dianne van Dulken
http://www.geocities.com/soho/studios/2497

My cool quote of the month:
"I have nothing to declare except my genius"
Yes, yes!  It's Oscar Wilde. However, the "Ooh Ah!" noises
were claimed by a friend of mine via email before I wrote a
single usenet post.  
Last month came from "The Grand Sophy" by Georgette Heyer.  Ah... Georgette Heyer. Sigh!

 
 
 

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by Chris Westo » Thu, 27 Aug 1998 04:00:00



Quote:

>Channel 7 has out bidded channel 9 for the live
>telecast of the cricket from England in 2001.

It seems that you lucky Aussies also get to see our matches against
NZ and the WI tour here.  Riches indeed...

cheers
--
Chris Weston

 
 
 

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by Coli » Thu, 27 Aug 1998 04:00:00

<snip>

Quote:
>> Anything is better than the appauling telecast of ch 9
>> last time round in 1997 when only we west aussies only
>> got the last session of play.

>Hate to burst your bubble, Colin, but The Age is taking a more cynical
>view. ( http://SportToday.org/). They
>point out that there is no guarantee that the Ashes will be free-to-air.
>Channel 7 has stated that their commitment is to footy, and where footy
>and cricket clash, footy will win out.

>I hope for the sake of Aussie cricket fans that The Age is wrong, but
>knowing the way Channel 7 works, I would guess that if you don't have
>pay TV, you won't see much of the 2001 ashes.

We west aussies only got the last session of play which really
pissed us off.

Here are some of the paragraphs in the artical.
West Australian 26/8/98

SEVEN WINS 2001 ASHES COVERAGE
Ch 7 yesterday won the television rights to the 2001 Ashes cricket
series between England and Australia in England.

A spokesman for the network, Alan Bateman, said ch 9 had been
caught with there pants down in the bidding war.
He believed ch 9 had treated its cricket veiwers with contempt
in its 1997 Ashes coverage.

"Ch 9's coverage would either be a telecast of the third and final
session of play only to be delayed telecast of the final two
sessions", He said.

Bateman said the format was unpopular with cricket supporters
and contributed to the poor television ratings for the 1997 Ashes
tour of England.

He admitted there would be potential clashes with AFL football
but Seven would work closely with the AFL in the next three
years to minimise the problems.

Bateman said Seven was e***d about winning the bid to telecast
the premeir cricket event in the world. It would broadcast all
Test matches and ODI's during the 2001 tour.

Regards

Colin

 
 
 

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by Coli » Thu, 27 Aug 1998 04:00:00

<snip>

Quote:
>>I hope for the sake of Aussie cricket fans that The Age is wrong, but
>>knowing the way Channel 7 works, I would guess that if you don't have
>>pay TV, you won't see much of the 2001 ashes.

>I strongly doubt you are correct here Brian.  There is a pretty
>serious time difference between England and here, we are +10 hours.
>So that means that when the tests are starting, it will be 9pm here.
>Even the twilight games are generally finished by then.

In the West we don't have day light saving for some stupid reason.
So there is the eaxtra hour difference so instead of 2 hours where 3
hours behind the east. But where only 7 hours ahead of England
so the footy is almost certain to interfere with WA veiwers.

Quote:

>What I would imagine will happen is that they will delay the football
>repeats until after the cricket is finished.  Hell for we poor
>creatures in Sydney who have a rotten time in seeing them in the first
>place (or course, owning a TV would help...)

>On that note, just before this weekend GO THE MIGHTY BOMBERS!!  Kill
>the cats!  (sorry, I know wrong sport)

Oh no. Down with the bombers.
Go the Eagles (jacket waving).

Regards

Colin

Quote:
>Cheers

>Di
>Dianne van Dulken

 
 
 

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by Drew » Fri, 28 Aug 1998 04:00:00


Quote:

> > Channel 7 has out bidded channel 9 for the live
> > telecast of the cricket from England in 2001.

> > At last no more ch 9 commentators. This is a breath
> > of fresh air.

> > Channel 7 will telecast all the test matches and all the
> > one day matches.

> > Anything is better than the appauling telecast of ch 9
> > last time round in 1997 when only we west aussies only
> > got the last session of play.

> Hate to burst your bubble, Colin, but The Age is taking a more cynical
> view. ( http://SportToday.org/). They
> point out that there is no guarantee that the Ashes will be free-to-air.
> Channel 7 has stated that their commitment is to footy, and where footy
> and cricket clash, footy will win out.

> </quote>
> Now, if Seven had had the rights to last year's tour, there would
> have been 16 instances of AFL matches clashing with Test matches.
> There would also have been six Mondays on which the cricket
> would have clashed with Talking Footy. Talk about clashes for the
> Ashes!

> Bateman said that where clashes could not be avoided, the cricket
> would be shown on "another service". Translated, that might mean
> another free-to-air network, but almost certainly means one of the
> pay networks, Optus or Foxtel.
> </unquote>

> I hope for the sake of Aussie cricket fans that The Age is wrong, but
> knowing the way Channel 7 works, I would guess that if you don't have
> pay TV, you won't see much of the 2001 ashes.

Brian is right. Luckily for me Channel 7 is working to set up a sporting
arrangement with Optus, I understand. Which means you poor ***s with
Foxtel are going to miss out just as much as those with no pay-TV. This
annoys me really badly. I signed up with Optus because they had won the
pay-TV rights to whichever tour was coming up at the time. But then Foxtel
won the rights to the tour of South Africa and I missed out! Then Optus won
the rights to the next tour and Foxtel viewers missed out! It is ludicrous
that, even after we make the commitment to pay for our TV viewing, we have
to depend on external factors as to whether we get to watch the cricket or
not.

I think channel 9 have done an extremely good job televising cricket in
this country since they first took over as the cricket channel. Do you
remember the days of one camera only on the ABC? So every second over, all
you saw was the batsman's back and you had to guess what was going on. Most
of the tecnology that we now take for granted was introduced by channel 9.

They have been not as successful broadcasting overseas tours - and for a
very valid reason. Just because I like to watch every ball of every day of
every match doesn't mean that everyone else in the country wants to. And
our game does take up a lot of broadcast time. Could you imagine how you
would feel if they announced that they were going to show Days of Our Lives
6 hours per day for five days straight, then take three days off and do it
again and again?? And not just during the day but in prime time too?? You
would be very angry! (Well, I would!) And that's how non-cricket fans feel
about the way we monopolise the TV station during the summer. And the
ratings don't necessarily justify generating that sort of anger.

I am sure you will find that channel 7 will show no more of a commitment to
show every ball than 9 did. And their previous record does not necessarily
fill me with confidence that they will do a better job. I'd better renew
that Optus contract - and hope like hell that 7 don't change their mind and
switch to Foxtel.

Drewy  

 
 
 

Ch 7 to get cricket of Ashes 2001 in oz

Post by Da » Fri, 28 Aug 1998 04:00:00

On Wed, 26 Aug 1998 16:47:56 +0100, Chris Weston

Quote:



>>Channel 7 has out bidded channel 9 for the live
>>telecast of the cricket from England in 2001.

>It seems that you lucky Aussies also get to see our matches against
>NZ and the WI tour here.  Riches indeed...

>cheers
>--
>Chris Weston

Only if you are an Aussie on the eastern seaboard, if you are West of
Adelaide then you are still an unlucky Aussie.

Dan