Large differential between highest & 2nd highest scores in an ODI

Large differential between highest & 2nd highest scores in an ODI

Post by Aslam Siddiqu » Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:36:23


Here are all instances where the difference (Dif) between the highest
and the second highest individual scores in a Limited-overs
International innings was 110 runs or greater.

Dif
163  IVA Richards   189*  WI  v Eng  Manchester      May 31, 1984
     EAE Baptiste    26

155  Saeed Anwar    194   Pak v Ind  Madras          May 21, 1997
     Inzamam-ul-Haq  39*

151  Kapil Dev      175*  Ind v Zim  Tunbridge Wells Jun 18, 1983
     SMH Kirmani     24*

144  MS Dhoni       183*  Ind v SL   Jaipur          Oct 31, 2005
     V Sehwag        39

137  ST Jayasuriya  189   SL  v Ind  Sharjah         Oct 28, 2000
     RP Arnold       52*

131  RA Smith       167*  Eng v Aus  Birmingham      May 21, 1993
     GP Thorpe       36

131  G Kirsten      188*  SAf v UAE  Rawalpindi      Feb 16, 1996
     WJ Cronje       57

124  DI Gower       158   Eng v NZ   Brisbane        Jan 15, 1983
     DW Randall      34

123  ML Hayden      181*  Aus v NZ   Hamilton        Feb 20, 2007
     SR Watson       68

114  SR Tendulkar   146   Ind v Zim  Jodhpur         Dec  8, 2000
     Zaheer Khan     32*

113  ST Jayasuriya  151*  SL  v Ind  Bombay          May 17, 1997
     MS Atapattu     38

112  A Flower       145   Zim v Ind  Colombo         Sep 14, 2002
     GW Flower       33

110  ME Waugh       173   Aus v WI   Melbourne       Feb  9, 2001
     RT Ponting      63

110  HH Gibbs       143   SAf v NZ   Johannesburg    Feb 16, 2003
     JH Kallis       33

aslam
GO PACERS!!!

 
 
 

Large differential between highest & 2nd highest scores in an ODI

Post by bdso.. » Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:04:47


Quote:
> Here are all instances where the difference (Dif) between the highest
> and the second highest individual scores in a Limited-overs
> International innings was 110 runs or greater.

> Dif

<snip>

Quote:

> 123  ML Hayden      181*  Aus v NZ   Hamilton        Feb 20, 2007
>      SR Watson       68

<snip>

Shouldn't that be 113?