Lousy pitch

Lousy pitch

Post by Southpa » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 03:32:59


Wouldn't have lasted 5 days however well the batsmen would've batted. That just sucks (esp. for a guy on vacation who is looking to watch as much cricket as possible. ;-))

If we're going to prepare pitches to mentally disintegrate the opposition, we should present them *before* the opposition is already mentally disintegrated. As evident from the Aussies' fielding in the final test, they'd already caved mentally: 40 extras in a low-scoring game, no fewer than 15 (!) runs off overthrows, and a couple of absolute sitters shelled in a tight run-chase. Plus all the stupid and unnecessary verbals. Couldn't tell whether the pitch was more crumbly or the Aussies' mental make-up. The after-effects of PowerPoint-gate, perhaps.

LOL at all the complaints about Chennai and Hyderabad, and silence about the pitch at Delhi, which I think might actually invite ICC censure.

For a paying spectator like me, a pitch that just about stretches 4 innings over 5 days is the holy grail...***whether it is dusty, or is spin friendly, or pace friendly. #1 requirement for me: it needs to be wallet-friendly! Now what should I do with the next 2 days of vacation? A pitch that has no hope of ever going into day 5 is the worst type of pitch for my wallet, and my wallet is more important than anything else.

-Samarth.

 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by guyper » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:04:01

Quote:

> Wouldn't have lasted 5 days however well the batsmen would've batted. That just sucks (esp. for a guy on vacation who is looking to watch as much cricket as possible. ;-))

> If we're going to prepare pitches to mentally disintegrate the opposition, we should present them *before* the opposition is already mentally disintegrated. As evident from the Aussies' fielding in the final test, they'd already caved mentally: 40 extras in a low-scoring game, no fewer than 15 (!) runs off overthrows, and a couple of absolute sitters shelled in a tight run-chase. Plus all the stupid and unnecessary verbals. Couldn't tell whether the pitch was more crumbly or the Aussies' mental make-up. The after-effects of PowerPoint-gate, perhaps.

> LOL at all the complaints about Chennai and Hyderabad, and silence about the pitch at Delhi, which I think might actually invite ICC censure.

> For a paying spectator like me, a pitch that just about stretches 4 innings over 5 days is the holy grail...***whether it is dusty, or is spin friendly, or pace friendly. #1 requirement for me: it needs to be wallet-friendly! Now what should I do with the next 2 days of vacation? A pitch that has no hope of ever going into day 5 is the worst type of pitch for my wallet, and my wallet is more important than anything else.

> -Samarth.

May be the Aussies have a valid point? Why prepare a pitch to last barely three days?

 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by alve » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:09:33

Quote:

> Wouldn't have lasted 5 days however well the batsmen would've batted.
> That just sucks (esp. for a guy on vacation who is looking to watch as
> much cricket as possible. ;-))

> If we're going to prepare pitches to mentally disintegrate the
> opposition, we should present them *before* the opposition is already
> mentally disintegrated. As evident from the Aussies' fielding in the
> final test, they'd already caved mentally: 40 extras in a low-scoring
> game, no fewer than 15 (!) runs off overthrows, and a couple of absolute
> sitters shelled in a tight run-chase. Plus all the stupid and
> unnecessary verbals. Couldn't tell whether the pitch was more crumbly or
> the Aussies' mental make-up. The after-effects of PowerPoint-gate,
> perhaps.

> LOL at all the complaints about Chennai and Hyderabad, and silence about
> the pitch at Delhi, which I think might actually invite ICC censure.

> For a paying spectator like me, a pitch that just about stretches 4
> innings over 5 days is the holy grail...***whether it is dusty, or
> is spin friendly, or pace friendly. #1 requirement for me: it needs to
> be wallet-friendly! Now what should I do with the next 2 days of
> vacation? A pitch that has no hope of ever going into day 5 is the worst
> type of pitch for my wallet, and my wallet is more important than
> anything else.

> -Samarth.

Are you the clown who was defending the T1 pitch?

alvey

 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by Southpa » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:22:37

Quote:


> > Wouldn't have lasted 5 days however well the batsmen would've batted.

> > That just sucks (esp. for a guy on vacation who is looking to watch as

> > much cricket as possible. ;-))

> > If we're going to prepare pitches to mentally disintegrate the

> > opposition, we should present them *before* the opposition is already

> > mentally disintegrated. As evident from the Aussies' fielding in the

> > final test, they'd already caved mentally: 40 extras in a low-scoring

> > game, no fewer than 15 (!) runs off overthrows, and a couple of absolute

> > sitters shelled in a tight run-chase. Plus all the stupid and

> > unnecessary verbals. Couldn't tell whether the pitch was more crumbly or

> > the Aussies' mental make-up. The after-effects of PowerPoint-gate,

> > perhaps.

> > LOL at all the complaints about Chennai and Hyderabad, and silence about

> > the pitch at Delhi, which I think might actually invite ICC censure.

> > For a paying spectator like me, a pitch that just about stretches 4

> > innings over 5 days is the holy grail...***whether it is dusty, or

> > is spin friendly, or pace friendly. #1 requirement for me: it needs to

> > be wallet-friendly! Now what should I do with the next 2 days of

> > vacation? A pitch that has no hope of ever going into day 5 is the worst

> > type of pitch for my wallet, and my wallet is more important than

> > anything else.

> > -Samarth.

> Are you the clown who was defending the T1 pitch?

Yes, and you are the dumb ass who criticized a 5-day pitch for days while not having much to say at all about a 3-day pitch. But you are a devotee of John "Mumbai 2004-5 settled down on D1" Buchanan, so what would you know.

-Samarth.

 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by alve » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:47:25

Quote:



>>> Wouldn't have lasted 5 days however well the batsmen would've batted.

>>> That just sucks (esp. for a guy on vacation who is looking to watch as

>>> much cricket as possible. ;-))

>>> If we're going to prepare pitches to mentally disintegrate the

>>> opposition, we should present them *before* the opposition is already

>>> mentally disintegrated. As evident from the Aussies' fielding in the

>>> final test, they'd already caved mentally: 40 extras in a low-scoring

>>> game, no fewer than 15 (!) runs off overthrows, and a couple of absolute

>>> sitters shelled in a tight run-chase. Plus all the stupid and

>>> unnecessary verbals. Couldn't tell whether the pitch was more crumbly or

>>> the Aussies' mental make-up. The after-effects of PowerPoint-gate,

>>> perhaps.

>>> LOL at all the complaints about Chennai and Hyderabad, and silence about

>>> the pitch at Delhi, which I think might actually invite ICC censure.

>>> For a paying spectator like me, a pitch that just about stretches 4

>>> innings over 5 days is the holy grail...***whether it is dusty, or

>>> is spin friendly, or pace friendly. #1 requirement for me: it needs to

>>> be wallet-friendly! Now what should I do with the next 2 days of

>>> vacation? A pitch that has no hope of ever going into day 5 is the worst

>>> type of pitch for my wallet, and my wallet is more important than

>>> anything else.

>>> -Samarth.

>> Are you the clown who was defending the T1 pitch?

> Yes, and you are the dumb ass who criticized a 5-day pitch for days while
> not having much to say at all about a 3-day pitch.

So in your little world the quality of a pitch is judged on how long the
match goes. Novel.

alvey

 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by willsutto » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:41:22


Quote:
> LOL at all the complaints about Chennai and Hyderabad, and silence about the pitch at Delhi, which I think might actually invite ICC censure.

> -Samarth

If you complain you are accused of whinging but my view on the
preparation of the pitches in India are well known and I have not
changed my mind   .... CHEATING

Now lets take that a bit further  ....   NZ v England. I think it could
be a case of the curators making the pitches NOT favouring the English
pace attack. I recall a series quite a few years ago where NZ made very
green pitches to aid their bowling attack   .. may have been against
India . It was the case for all the Tests and NZ won. Basically its CHEATING

It wont solve the problem but I would do away with the coin toss and
have the visiting Captain having his choice

 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by CaraMi » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:49:47


Quote:
> It wont solve the problem but I would do away with the coin toss and
> have the visiting Captain having his choice

Australia won the toss in each and every match of this series. So
effectively it was the visiting Captain having his choice.
 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by willsutto » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:04:27


Quote:

>> It wont solve the problem but I would do away with the coin toss and
>> have the visiting Captain having his choice

> Australia won the toss in each and every match of this series. So
> effectively it was the visiting Captain having his choice.

that is why I said "it wont solve the problem"
 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by Jellor » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:23:05


Quote:

> > LOL at all the complaints about Chennai and Hyderabad, and silence about the pitch at Delhi, which I think might actually invite ICC censure.

> > -Samarth

> If you complain you are accused of whinging but my view on the
> preparation of the pitches in India are well known and I have not
> changed my mind ? .... CHEATING

> Now lets take that a bit further ?.... ? NZ v England. I think it could
> be a case of the curators making the pitches NOT favouring the English
> pace attack. I recall a series quite a few years ago where NZ made very
> green pitches to aid their bowling attack ? .. may have been against
> India . It was the case for all the Tests and NZ won. Basically its CHEATING

> It wont solve the problem but I would do away with the coin toss and
> have the visiting Captain having his choice

Thats the beauty about playing and winning away from home. Otherwise
whats the point? The last thing cricket needs for all four corners of
the world to be identical.
 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by Jellor » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:24:07


Quote:
> Wouldn't have lasted 5 days however well the batsmen would've batted. That just sucks (esp. for a guy on vacation who is looking to watch as much cricket as possible. ;-))

> If we're going to prepare pitches to mentally disintegrate the opposition, we should present them *before* the opposition is already mentally disintegrated. As evident from the Aussies' fielding in the final test, they'd already caved mentally: 40 extras in a low-scoring game, no fewer than 15 (!) runs off overthrows, and a couple of absolute sitters shelled in a tight run-chase. Plus all the stupid and unnecessary verbals. Couldn't tell whether the pitch was more crumbly or the Aussies' mental make-up. The after-effects of PowerPoint-gate, perhaps.

> LOL at all the complaints about Chennai and Hyderabad, and silence about the pitch at Delhi, which I think might actually invite ICC censure.

> For a paying spectator like me, a pitch that just about stretches 4 innings over 5 days is the holy grail...***whether it is dusty, or is spin friendly, or pace friendly. #1 requirement for me: it needs to be wallet-friendly! Now what should I do with the next 2 days of vacation? A pitch that has no hope of ever going into day 5 is the worst type of pitch for my wallet, and my wallet is more important than anything else.

> -Samarth.

India seem to perform well on all four pitches. Did the world complain
when Australia won 4 zip on pitches which suited them? No of course.
 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by vijaykum.. » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:55:40


Quote:
> Wouldn't have lasted 5 days however well the batsmen would've batted. That just sucks (esp. for a guy on vacation who is looking to watch as much cricket as possible. ;-))

> If we're going to prepare pitches to mentally disintegrate the opposition, we should present them *before* the opposition is already mentally disintegrated. As evident from the Aussies' fielding in the final test, they'd already caved mentally: 40 extras in a low-scoring game, no fewer than 15 (!) runs off overthrows, and a couple of absolute sitters shelled in a tight run-chase. Plus all the stupid and unnecessary verbals. Couldn't tell whether the pitch was more crumbly or the Aussies' mental make-up. The after-effects of PowerPoint-gate, perhaps.

> LOL at all the complaints about Chennai and Hyderabad, and silence about the pitch at Delhi, which I think might actually invite ICC censure.

> For a paying spectator like me, a pitch that just about stretches 4 innings over 5 days is the holy grail...***whether it is dusty, or is spin friendly, or pace friendly. #1 requirement for me: it needs to be wallet-friendly! Now what should I do with the next 2 days of vacation? A pitch that has no hope of ever going into day 5 is the worst type of pitch for my wallet, and my wallet is more important than anything else.

> -Samarth.

Were you actually at Feroze Shah Kotla for the game?
If yes, a pity we missed each other. I was at the game,
sitting in the ONGC Hill "A" stand.

Vijay

 
 
 

Lousy pitch

Post by jzfredrick » Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:01:35

Quote:

> Thats the beauty about playing and winning away from home. Otherwise
> whats the point? The last thing cricket needs for all four corners of
> the world to be identical.

Overall I agree with you, but I'd like to see something done about the "roads". What? Not sure. Any groundsmen here?